Inequalities in receipt of injury prevention in primary care

The objective of this study was to assess the receipt of a variety of injury- prevention interventions by socio-demographic characteristics. The families of children aged 3-12 months registered with 18 general practices across Nottingham comprised the intervention groups for the trial (n = 1100). The package of interventions included: standardised safety advice at child-health surveillance consultations (CHS) at 6-9, 12-15 and 18-24 months; provision of low-cost stair-gates, fireguards, smoke alarms and cupboard locks to families in receipt of means-tested benefits; standardised home-safety checks and free first-aid training. A cross-sectional questionnaire survey of socio-demographic characteristics was followed by assessment of whether interventions had been received during a two-year period. Seventy-eight per cent (n = 857) of families received at least one intervention. Safety advice at CHS was less likely to be received by families without access to a car and those belonging to an ethnic group other than white. Home safety checks were less likely to be received by families in receipt of benefits and families whose children had suffered an injury, First-aid training was less likely to be received by families living in rented accommodation. Low-cost safety equipment was more likely to be received by families living in rented accommodation and those receiving benefits. Injury prevention interventions are not accessed equally by all socio- demographic groups, and the provision of low-cost safety equipment may help to reduce this inequality, Inequality in receipt of safety advice at child health surveillance by ethnic group has been demonstrated and further work is required to address the reasons for this. Targeting injury prevention towards this group may be required.

[1]  P Marsh,et al.  Preventing injuries in children: cluster randomised controlled trial in primary care , 1999, BMJ.

[2]  Azeem Majeed,et al.  Socioeconomic differences in childhood consultation rates in general practice in England and Wales: prospective cohort study , 1999, BMJ.

[3]  D. Kendrick,et al.  Accidental injury: risk and preventative interventions , 1997, Archives of disease in childhood.

[4]  C Power,et al.  Does the decline in child injury mortality vary by social class? A comparison of class specific mortality in 1981 and 1991 , 1996, BMJ.

[5]  I. Roberts Who's prepared for advocacy? Another inverse law. , 1995, Injury prevention : journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention.

[6]  C. Gotschall,et al.  Parental attitudes and knowledge of child safety. A national survey. , 1990, American journal of diseases of children.

[7]  A. While Child health clinic attendance during the first two years of life. , 1990, Public health.

[8]  M. Allsop,et al.  Who uses child health clinics and why: a study of a deprived inner city district. , 1989, Health visitor.

[9]  B. Leese,et al.  Uptake of immunisation in district health authorities in England , 1988, British medical journal.

[10]  G. Marsh,et al.  Deprivation and health in one general practice. , 1986, British medical journal.

[11]  R. Madeley,et al.  Mothers' attitudes to a child health clinic in a deprived area of Nottingham. , 1986, Public health.

[12]  N. Adjaye Measles immunization. Some factors affecting non-acceptance of vaccine. , 1981, Public health.

[13]  P. Zinkin,et al.  Child health clincs and inverse care laws: evidence from longitudinal study of 1878 pre-school children. , 1976, British medical journal.