Measuring End-User Delight: Is Success in Project Design and Delivery Enough?

This paper explores a new approach for measuring project success, and makes the case that end-user delight is a necessary part of performance review. Regardless of project type, there are three generic phases that all successful projects must navigate: initiate, implement and influence. These are translated into their primary goals of design, deliver and delight. Evaluation of any project can be undertaken using the lenses of its financial, social, political and environmental context. The aim in this paper is to unpack the method for measuring delight via satisfaction surveys of project customers, such as client, end-users and local community. Two 5-point Likert scales, with scores multiplied together, are recommended to assess opinions, enabling a four-quadrant model to be produced reflecting ‘wants’ and ‘needs’. Successful projects, therefore, can be described by the percentage of respondents who have a positive view that their wants and needs have been largely achieved. Four specific success factors for measuring end-user delight are proposed in this paper, and comprise desirable (i.e. attractiveness), adaptable (i.e. flexibility), practicable (i.e. fit for purpose) and serviceable (i.e. enduring). They too are generic. These factors form part of a larger framework, known as i3d3, which can assess and rank project success and provide an opportunity for feedback that closes the loop between designer intent and customer effect. This paper sets out a possible way forward to compare future projects in a consistent and objective manner, with particular emphasis on the post-delivery phase.

[1]  J. Rodney Turner,et al.  The Relationship between Project Success and Project Efficiency , 2014 .

[2]  S. M. Kinsella Activity-Based Costing: Does it Warrant Inclusion in a Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide)? , 2002 .

[3]  Rebecca J. Yang,et al.  Stakeholder-associated risks and their interactions in complex green building projects: a social network model , 2014 .

[4]  Abdallah Al-khawaja Environmental Auditing : Modelling Office Workplace Ecology. , 2015 .

[5]  Clemens Henoekl Influence of usability and user experience on user performance , 2015 .

[6]  M. Kunc,et al.  Benefits Realisation Management and its influence on project success and on the execution of business strategies , 2015 .

[7]  Chinyere Nzekwe-Excel,et al.  Development of an integrated framework for satisfaction assessment of construction project teams , 2010 .

[8]  Craig Langston,et al.  Implementation of 3D integration model for project delivery success: Case study , 2017 .

[9]  Anandasivakumar Ekambaram,et al.  Project Evaluation Holistic Framework - Application on Megaproject Case , 2015, CENTERIS/ProjMAN/HCist.

[10]  Ronald K. Mitchell,et al.  Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of who and What Really Counts , 1997 .

[11]  Matti J. Haverila,et al.  The impact of product superiority on customer satisfaction in project management , 2016 .

[12]  Per Svejvig,et al.  Taking stock of project value creation: A structured literature review with future directions for research and practice , 2016 .

[13]  K. Davis Reconciling views of project success : a multiple stakeholder model , 2018 .

[14]  Craig Langston,et al.  Measuring project success: conceptualizing a new approach applicable to all project types , 2018 .

[15]  Ashly Pinnington,et al.  Exploring the Value of Project Management: Linking Project Management Performance and Project Success , 2014 .

[16]  Keith Davids,et al.  Team Sports Performance Analysed Through the Lens of Social Network Theory: Implications for Research and Practice , 2017, Sports Medicine.

[17]  Jeffrey K. Pinto,et al.  Does Agile work? - A quantitative analysis of agile project success , 2015 .

[18]  Craig Langston Green Roof Evaluation: A Holistic ‘Long Life, Loose Fit, Low Energy’ Approach , 2015 .

[19]  Stéphanie Missonier,et al.  Stakeholder analysis and engagement in projects: From stakeholder relational perspective to stakeholder relational ontology , 2014 .

[20]  I. Ali,et al.  Project governance, benefit management, and project success: Towards a framework for supporting organizational strategy implementation , 2017 .

[21]  Bambang Trigunarsyah,et al.  Evaluating the level of stakeholder involvement during the project planning processes of building projects , 2015 .

[22]  R. Müller,et al.  Relationships Between a Project Management Methodology and Project Success in Different Project Governance Contexts , 2015, Project Management Methodologies, Governance and Success.

[23]  S. Wilkinson,et al.  Routledge Handbook of Sustainable Real Estate , 2018 .

[24]  Kam Jugdev,et al.  A Retrospective look at our Evolving Understanding of Project Success , 2005, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[25]  Marisa Analía Sánchez,et al.  Integrating sustainability issues into project management , 2015 .

[26]  Sara Marcelino-Sádaba,et al.  Using project management as a way to sustainability. From a comprehensive review to a framework definition , 2015 .

[27]  Nicholas J. Ashill,et al.  Relationship quality and satisfaction: Customer-perceived success factors for on-time projects , 2015 .

[28]  Tuomas Ahola,et al.  Project sustainability strategies: A systematic literature review , 2017 .

[29]  Angus Morrison-Saunders,et al.  Conceptualising sustainability assessment , 2004 .

[30]  C. Langston Measuring Good Architecture: Long life, loose fit, low energy , 2014 .

[31]  Martina Huemann,et al.  Project Stakeholder Management—Past and Present , 2015 .

[32]  Rodney Turner,et al.  Forecasting Success on Large Projects: Developing Reliable Scales to Predict Multiple Perspectives by Multiple Stakeholders over Multiple Time Frames , 2012 .

[33]  E. Carayannis,et al.  Post-project reviews as a key project management competence , 2008 .

[34]  J. Pinto,et al.  Variations in Critical Success Factors Over the Stages in the Project Life Cycle , 1988 .

[35]  Željko M. Torbica,et al.  Customer Satisfaction in Home Building , 2001 .