Dynamic performance analysis of U.S. wireline telecommunication companies

Assessing the changes over time in the efficiency of firms participating in competitive markets has always been a major concern to researchers and experts alike. With respect to the US wireline telecommunications sector, recent changes in unbundling regulations, as well as intermodal competition and mergers, have just increased uncertainty in a sector still marked by the Telecommunications Act of 1996. Although Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) has become a methodology commonly used in many efficiency assessment applications, in the telecommunications context there is a need to implement an approach that takes into account carry-over activities between consecutive years; because of a wide customer base, financial long-term planning and investments in network elements and facilities are crucial for Local Exchange Carriers (LECs) to succeed. To that end, a Dynamic DEA application is formulated in this paper to evaluate the Incumbent LECs' (ILECs) performance from 1997 to 2007. Finally, a regression analysis has been carried out to establish the impact of competition and regulatory schemes upon carriers' efficiency. The results show that local competition has worsened efficiency, whereas neither intermodal competition nor incentive regulation has such a clear influence.

[1]  Did federal regulation discourage facilities-based entry into US local telecommunications markets? , 2008 .

[2]  Dennis L. Weisman,et al.  Price cap regulation: what have we learned from 25 years of experience in the telecommunications industry? , 2010 .

[3]  Sebastián Lozano,et al.  A network DEA assessment of team efficiency in the NBA , 2014, Ann. Oper. Res..

[4]  S. Majumdar,et al.  Mergers and synergy: Lessons from contemporary telecommunications history , 2012 .

[5]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  A developmental study of data envelopment analysis in measuring the efficiency of maintenance units in the U.S. air forces , 1984, Ann. Oper. Res..

[6]  Nakil Sung,et al.  Intermodal competition and a slowdown in the productivity growth of US local exchange carriers , 2013 .

[7]  David G. Loomis,et al.  Intermodal competition in local telecommunications markets , 2005, Inf. Econ. Policy.

[8]  R. Färe,et al.  Productivity changes in Swedish pharamacies 1980–1989: A non-parametric Malmquist approach , 1992 .

[9]  Kaoru Tone,et al.  A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis , 1997, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[10]  Marcelo Resende,et al.  Efficiency measurement and regulation in US telecommunications: A robustness analysis , 2008 .

[11]  G. C. Pentzaropoulos,et al.  Comparing the operational efficiency of the main European telecommunications organizations: A quantitative analysis , 2002 .

[12]  J. Hagedoorn,et al.  Strategic focus of incumbents in the European telecommunications industry: The cases of BT, Deutsche Telekom and KPN , 2008 .

[13]  Rajiv D. Banker,et al.  Technological progress and productivity growth in the U.S. mobile telecommunications industry , 2010, Ann. Oper. Res..

[14]  Allen M. Featherstone,et al.  Market Consolidation and Productivity Growth in U.S. Wireline Telecommunications: Stochastic Frontier Analysis vs. Malmquist Index , 2010 .

[15]  K. Tone,et al.  Dynamic DEA: A slacks-based measure approach , 2010 .

[16]  Marcelo Resende Regulatory Regimes and Efficiency in US Local Telephony , 2000 .

[17]  Emmanuel Thanassoulis,et al.  Introduction to the Theory and Application of Data Envelopment Analysis: A Foundation Text with Integrated Software , 2001 .

[18]  S. Grosskopf,et al.  PRODUCTIVITY CHANGE IN SWEDISH PHARMACIES 1980–1989: A NONPARAMETRIC MALMQUIST APPROACH , 1992 .

[19]  G. Tzeng,et al.  The comparative productivity efficiency for global telecoms , 2006 .

[20]  Seyed Jafar Sadjadi,et al.  A bootstrapped robust data envelopment analysis model for efficiency estimating of telecommunication companies in Iran , 2010 .

[21]  Recent developments in US wireline telecommunications , 2007 .

[22]  Noel D. Uri,et al.  The effect of incentive regulation on productive efficiency in telecommunications , 2001 .

[23]  Kaoru Tone,et al.  Network DEA: A slacks-based measure approach , 2009, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[24]  S. Majumdar Incentive Compatible Mechanism Design and Firm Growth: Experiences from Telecommunications Sector Regulation , 2010 .

[25]  Christian M. Dippon,et al.  Wholesale unbundling and intermodal competition , 2010 .

[26]  Yan Peng,et al.  Competition and production efficiency: Telecommunications in OECD countries , 2001, Information Economics and Policy.

[27]  William W. Cooper,et al.  Handbook on data envelopment analysis , 2011 .

[28]  Kaoru Tone,et al.  A slacks-based measure of super-efficiency in data envelopment analysis , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[29]  Noel D. Uri,et al.  Measuring productivity change in telecommunications , 2000 .

[30]  B. Yawe,et al.  Total factor productivity growth in Uganda's telecommunications industry , 2011 .

[31]  Joe Zhu,et al.  Quantitative Models for Performance Evaluation and Benchmarking: Data Envelopment Analysis with Spreadsheets and DEA Excel Solver , 2002 .

[32]  Hsu-Hao Yang,et al.  Using DEA window analysis to measure efficiencies of Taiwan's integrated telecommunication firms , 2009 .

[33]  David E. M. Sappington,et al.  The Impact of State Incentive Regulation on the U.S. Telecommunications Industry , 2002 .

[34]  Padma Sastry Identifying leaders and laggards-A method and application to US local telephone companies , 2009 .

[35]  W. Cooper,et al.  Data Envelopment Analysis: A Comprehensive Text with Models, Applications, References and DEA-Solver Software , 1999 .

[36]  C. Cambini,et al.  Broadband investment and regulation: A literature review , 2009 .

[37]  Philip G. Gayle,et al.  Competition and investment in telecommunications , 2008 .

[38]  Unbundled Network Elements: Global experiences and game theoretical analysis , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management.