Evolution in response to an abiotic stress shapes species coexistence

Adaptation to abiotic stresses is pervasive and generally relies on traits that are not independent from those affecting species interactions. Still, how such evolution affects species coexistence remains elusive. We addressed this using populations of two herbivorous spider mite species (Tetranychus urticae and T. evansi) evolving separately on tomato plants hyper-accumulating cadmium, a stressful environment for the mites, or on control plants with no cadmium. Combinations of phenotypic analyses with structural stability theory predicted that adaptation of both species to cadmium allow them to coexist in that environment, whereas in cadmium-naïve mite populations the most likely outcome is exclusion. The shift from competitive exclusion to coexistence was due to an increase in niche differences accompanied by a decrease in fitness differences. A parallel population experiment validated these predictions. However, such changes were environment-specific, as spider-mite adaptation to cadmium did not affect species interactions and competitive outcomes in the cadmium-free environment. Our results suggest that evolution of single species in a new environment, even in absence of interspecific competitors, shapes species coexistence. Therefore, population shifts to novel environments may have unforeseen evolutionary consequences for community composition and the maintenance of species diversity.

[1]  M. Kasada,et al.  Evolution of competitive traits changes species diversity in a natural field , 2022, Proceedings of the Royal Society B.

[2]  Anita Narwani,et al.  Ecology and evolution of competitive trait variation in natural phytoplankton communities under selection , 2022, Ecology letters.

[3]  M. Yamamichi,et al.  Integrating eco‐evolutionary dynamics and modern coexistence theory , 2022, Ecology letters.

[4]  S. Magalhães,et al.  Specific sequence of arrival promotes coexistence via spatial niche pre-emption by the weak competitor. , 2022, Ecology letters.

[5]  D. Bonte,et al.  The Demographic Consequences of Adaptation: Evidence from Experimental Evolution , 2022, The American Naturalist.

[6]  Timothy E. Farkas,et al.  Adaptation reduces competitive dominance and alters community assembly , 2021, Proceedings of the Royal Society B.

[7]  Serguei Saavedra,et al.  Structural forecasting of species persistence under changing environments. , 2020, Ecology letters.

[8]  M. Yamamichi,et al.  Rapid evolution promotes fluctuation-dependent species coexistence , 2020, bioRxiv.

[9]  I. Bartomeus,et al.  cxr: A toolbox for modelling species coexistence in R , 2020, Methods in Ecology and Evolution.

[10]  K. Tsuji,et al.  Intraspecific Adaptation Load: A Mechanism for Species Coexistence. , 2020, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[11]  Leonor R. Rodrigues,et al.  Creating outbred and inbred populations in haplodiploids to measure adaptive responses in the laboratory , 2020, Ecology and evolution.

[12]  Rudolf P. Rohr,et al.  Disentangling the effects of external perturbations on coexistence and priority effects , 2020, Journal of Ecology.

[13]  D. Srivastava,et al.  Evolution of an inferior competitor increases resistance to biological invasion , 2020, Nature Ecology & Evolution.

[14]  T. Fukami,et al.  Applying modern coexistence theory to priority effects , 2019, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[15]  Jonathan M. Levine,et al.  Effects of rapid evolution on species coexistence , 2019, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[16]  R. Freckleton,et al.  How to quantify competitive ability , 2018 .

[17]  Simon Maccracken Stump,et al.  Chesson's coexistence theory , 2018 .

[18]  Rudolf P. Rohr,et al.  Towards the Integration of Niche and Network Theories. , 2018, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[19]  U. Riebesell,et al.  Rapid evolution of highly variable competitive abilities in a key phytoplankton species , 2018, Nature Ecology & Evolution.

[20]  Casper W. Berg,et al.  glmmTMB Balances Speed and Flexibility Among Packages for Zero-inflated Generalized Linear Mixed Modeling , 2017, R J..

[21]  J. Laakso,et al.  Evolutionary contribution to coexistence of competitors in microbial food webs , 2017, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[22]  Serguei Saavedra,et al.  A structural approach for understanding multispecies coexistence , 2017 .

[23]  Da‐Yong Zhang,et al.  Evolution alters ecological mechanisms of coexistence in experimental microcosms , 2016 .

[24]  Meike J. Wittmann,et al.  Eco-evolutionary buffering: rapid evolution facilitates regional species coexistence despite local priority effects , 2016, bioRxiv.

[25]  C. Burch,et al.  Evolutionary rescue and the coexistence of generalist and specialist competitors: an experimental test , 2015, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[26]  Rudolf P. Rohr,et al.  On the structural stability of mutualistic systems , 2014, Science.

[27]  Annalise B. Paaby,et al.  Cryptic genetic variation: evolution's hidden substrate , 2014, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[28]  J. Cornuet,et al.  Test of Colonisation Scenarios Reveals Complex Invasion History of the Red Tomato Spider Mite Tetranychus evansi , 2012, PloS one.

[29]  Richard A. Lankau Rapid Evolutionary Change and the Coexistence of Species , 2011 .

[30]  G. Bell,et al.  The effect of elevated CO2 on growth and competition in experimental phytoplankton communities , 2011 .

[31]  T. Garland,et al.  Experimental Evolution: Concepts, Methods, and Applications of Selection Experiments , 2009 .

[32]  Richard A. Lankau A chemical trait creates a genetic trade-off between intra- and interspecific competitive ability. , 2008, Ecology.

[33]  Richard A. Lankau,et al.  Mutual Feedbacks Maintain Both Genetic and Species Diversity in a Plant Community , 2007, Science.

[34]  M. Rose,et al.  The devil in the details of life-history evolution: Instability and reversal of genetic correlations during selection onDrosophila development , 2003, Journal of Genetics.

[35]  P. Chesson Mechanisms of Maintenance of Species Diversity , 2000 .

[36]  Charles W. Fowler,et al.  Density Dependence as Related to Life History Strategy , 1981 .