Traction forces and rigidity sensing regulate cell functions

Increasing evidence suggests that mechanical cues inherent to the extracellular matrix may be as important as its chemical nature in regulating cell behavior. Here, the response of cells to the mechanical properties of the substrate is examined by culturing 3T3 fibroblastic cells and epithelial cells on surfaces composed of a dense array of flexible microfabricated pillars. We focus on the influence of substrate rigidity on the traction forces exerted by cells, and on cell adhesion and migration. We first measure these forces by monitoring the deflection of the pillars. Then, by varying their geometric parameters, we control the substrate stiffness over a large range from 1 to 200 nN μm−1. We show that the force–rigidity relationship exhibits a similar behavior for both cell types. Two distinct regimes are evidenced: first, a linear increase of the force with the rigidity and then a saturation plateau for the largest rigidities. We observe that the cell spreading area increases with increasing rigidity, as well as the size of focal adhesions. Substrates with an anisotropic rigidity allow us to determine that the migration paths of 3T3 cells are oriented in the stiffest direction in correlation with maximal traction forces. Finally, to compare the force measurements on micro-textured surfaces and continuous flexible gels, we propose an elastic model that estimates the equivalent Young's modulus of a micropillar substrate. This qualitative model gives comparable results for both experimental approaches.

[1]  Pascal Silberzan,et al.  Traction forces exerted through N‐cadherin contacts , 2006, Biology of the cell.

[2]  Daniel I. C. Wang,et al.  Engineering cell shape and function. , 1994, Science.

[3]  Shelly R. Peyton,et al.  Extracellular matrix rigidity governs smooth muscle cell motility in a biphasic fashion , 2005, Journal of cellular physiology.

[4]  N. Kirchgessner,et al.  Toward physiological conditions for cell analyses: forces of heart muscle cells suspended between elastic micropillars. , 2008, Biophysical journal.

[5]  U. Schwarz,et al.  Cell organization in soft media due to active mechanosensing , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  S. Carter,et al.  Principles of Cell Motility: The Direction of Cell Movement and Cancer Invasion , 1965, Nature.

[7]  C. Murphy,et al.  Epithelial contact guidance on well-defined micro- and nanostructured substrates , 2003, Journal of Cell Science.

[8]  P. Janmey,et al.  Biomechanics and Mechanotransduction in Cells and Tissues Cell type-specific response to growth on soft materials , 2005 .

[9]  Benjamin Geiger,et al.  Focal Contacts as Mechanosensors Externally Applied Local Mechanical Force Induces Growth of Focal Contacts by an Mdia1-Dependent and Rock-Independent Mechanism , 2001 .

[10]  Yu-Li Wang,et al.  Substrate rigidity regulates the formation and maintenance of tissues. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[11]  C. Turner,et al.  Focal adhesions: transmembrane junctions between the extracellular matrix and the cytoskeleton. , 1988, Annual review of cell biology.

[12]  Christopher S. Chen,et al.  Cells lying on a bed of microneedles: An approach to isolate mechanical force , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  Samuel A. Safran,et al.  Dynamics of cell orientation , 2007 .

[14]  L. Gibson,et al.  Fibroblast contractile force is independent of the stiffness which resists the contraction. , 2002, Experimental cell research.

[15]  Manuel Théry,et al.  The extracellular matrix guides the orientation of the cell division axis , 2005, Nature Cell Biology.

[16]  C. O'neill,et al.  Evidence for two distinct mechanisms of anchorage stimulation in freshly explanted and 3T3 Swiss mouse fibroblasts , 1986, Cell.

[17]  Donald E. Ingber,et al.  The structural and mechanical complexity of cell-growth control , 1999, Nature Cell Biology.

[18]  Y. Wang,et al.  Cell locomotion and focal adhesions are regulated by substrate flexibility. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  Jake M. Hofman,et al.  Nonmuscle myosin IIA-dependent force inhibits cell spreading and drives F-actin flow. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[20]  M. Dembo,et al.  Cell movement is guided by the rigidity of the substrate. , 2000, Biophysical journal.

[21]  Michael P. Sheetz,et al.  Rigidity Sensing at the Leading Edge through αvβ3 Integrins and RPTPα , 2006 .

[22]  M. Dembo,et al.  Traction force microscopy of migrating normal and H-ras transformed 3T3 fibroblasts. , 2001, Biophysical journal.

[23]  M. Sheetz,et al.  A micromachined device provides a new bend on fibroblast traction forces. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[24]  Dennis Discher,et al.  Substrate compliance versus ligand density in cell on gel responses. , 2004, Biophysical journal.

[25]  M. Dembo,et al.  Substrate flexibility regulates growth and apoptosis of normal but not transformed cells. , 2000, American journal of physiology. Cell physiology.

[26]  R. Austin,et al.  Force mapping in epithelial cell migration. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[27]  Joachim P Spatz,et al.  Microtubule gliding and cross-linked microtubule networks on micropillar interfaces. , 2005, Nano letters.

[28]  J. Jansen,et al.  Attachment of fibroblasts on smooth and microgrooved polystyrene. , 1999, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[29]  P. Janmey,et al.  Effects of substrate stiffness on cell morphology, cytoskeletal structure, and adhesion. , 2005, Cell motility and the cytoskeleton.

[30]  D. Lauffenburger,et al.  Cell Migration: A Physically Integrated Molecular Process , 1996, Cell.

[31]  K. Jacobson,et al.  Imaging the traction stresses exerted by locomoting cells with the elastic substratum method. , 1996, Biophysical journal.

[32]  S. Sen,et al.  Matrix Elasticity Directs Stem Cell Lineage Specification , 2006, Cell.

[33]  L. Addadi,et al.  Force and focal adhesion assembly: a close relationship studied using elastic micropatterned substrates , 2001, Nature Cell Biology.

[34]  P. Janmey,et al.  Tissue Cells Feel and Respond to the Stiffness of Their Substrate , 2005, Science.

[35]  M. Dembo,et al.  Stresses at the cell-to-substrate interface during locomotion of fibroblasts. , 1999, Biophysical journal.

[36]  S. Safran,et al.  Limitation of cell adhesion by the elasticity of the extracellular matrix. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[37]  Ben Fabry,et al.  Traction fields, moments, and strain energy that cells exert on their surroundings. , 2002, American journal of physiology. Cell physiology.

[38]  Alexander A Spector,et al.  Emergent patterns of growth controlled by multicellular form and mechanics. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[39]  M. Sheetz,et al.  Periodic Lamellipodial Contractions Correlate with Rearward Actin Waves , 2004, Cell.

[40]  M. Sheetz,et al.  Cell migration: regulation of force on extracellular-matrix-integrin complexes. , 1998, Trends in cell biology.

[41]  S. Carter,et al.  Haptotaxis and the Mechanism of Cell Motility , 1967, Nature.

[42]  Marion Ghibaudo,et al.  Rigidity-driven growth and migration of epithelial cells on microstructured anisotropic substrates , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[43]  Daniel Choquet,et al.  Extracellular Matrix Rigidity Causes Strengthening of Integrin–Cytoskeleton Linkages , 1997, Cell.

[44]  Pascal Silberzan,et al.  Is the mechanical activity of epithelial cells controlled by deformations or forces? , 2005, Biophysical journal.

[45]  P. Chavrier,et al.  Collective migration of an epithelial monolayer in response to a model wound , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[46]  A. Harris,et al.  Silicone rubber substrata: a new wrinkle in the study of cell locomotion. , 1980, Science.

[47]  N. Balaban,et al.  Calculation of forces at focal adhesions from elastic substrate data: the effect of localized force and the need for regularization. , 2002, Biophysical journal.

[48]  Joachim P Spatz,et al.  Propagation of mechanical stress through the actin cytoskeleton toward focal adhesions: model and experiment. , 2008, Biophysical journal.

[49]  Kheya Sengupta,et al.  Fibroblast adaptation and stiffness matching to soft elastic substrates. , 2007, Biophysical journal.

[50]  A Curtis,et al.  Topographical control of cells. , 1997, Biomaterials.