Objective quantification of upper extremity motor functions in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Test

Two tri-axial accelerometers were placed on the wrists (one on each hand) of the patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) and a non-PD control group. Subjects were asked to perform three of the upper extremity motor function tasks from the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) test. The tasks were: 1) finger tapping, 2) opening and closing of palms, and 3) pronation-supination movements of the forearms. The inertia signals were wirelessly received and stored on a computer for further off-line analysis. Various features such as range, standard deviation, entropy, time to accomplish the task, and maximum frequency present in the signal were extracted and compared. The results showed that among the studied population, “standard deviation”, “range”, “entropy”, “time” and “max frequency” are the best to worst features, respectively, to distinguish between the non-PD and PD subjects. Furthermore, using the mentioned features, it is more probable to distinguish between the non-PD and PD subjects from tasks 2 and 3 as opposed to task 1.

[1]  P. Bonato,et al.  Data mining techniques to detect motor fluctuations in Parkinson's disease , 2004, The 26th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[2]  H. Fernandez,et al.  Updates in the medical management of Parkinson disease , 2012, Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine.

[3]  F. Horak,et al.  Deep brain stimulation for Parkinson disease: an expert consensus and review of key issues. , 2011, Archives of neurology.

[4]  Alok Sharma,et al.  Efficacy and Safety of Deep Brain Stimulation as an Adjunct to Pharmacotherapy for the Treatment of Parkinson Disease , 2012, The Annals of pharmacotherapy.

[5]  Shyamal Patel,et al.  Longitudinal monitoring of patients with Parkinson's disease via wearable sensor technology in the home setting , 2011, 2011 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[6]  W. Weiner,et al.  A comparative study of physical performance measures in Parkinson's disease , 2008, Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society.

[7]  Kamiar Aminian,et al.  Quantification of Tremor and Bradykinesia in Parkinson's Disease Using a Novel Ambulatory Monitoring System , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[8]  J. Langston,et al.  The parkinson's complex: Parkinsonism is just the tip of the iceberg , 2006, Annals of neurology.

[9]  M. Breteler,et al.  Epidemiology of Parkinson's disease , 2006, The Lancet Neurology.

[10]  J. Jankovic,et al.  Movement Disorder Society‐sponsored revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS‐UPDRS): Scale presentation and clinimetric testing results , 2008, Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society.

[11]  Kamiar Aminian,et al.  On-Shoe Wearable Sensors for Gait and Turning Assessment of Patients With Parkinson's Disease , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[12]  Paolo Bonato,et al.  Monitoring Motor Fluctuations in Patients With Parkinson's Disease Using Wearable Sensors , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine.

[13]  Joseph P. Giuffrida,et al.  Clinically deployable Kinesia™ technology for automated tremor assessment , 2009, Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society.