Spatiotemporal analysis of DNA repair using charged particle radiation.

Approaches to visualise the dynamics of the DNA lesion processing substantially contributes to the understanding of the hierarchical organisation of the DNA damage response pathways. Charged particle irradiation has recently emerged as a tool to generate discrete sites of subnuclear damage by its means of extremely localised dose deposition at low energies, thus facilitating the spatiotemporal analysis of repair events. In addition, they are of high interest for risk estimations of human space exploration (e.g. mars mission) in the high energy regime (HZE). In this short review we will give examples for the application of charged particle irradiation to study spatiotemporal aspects of DNA damage recognition and repair in the context of recent achievements in this field. Beamline microscopy allows determining the exact kinetics of repair-related proteins after irradiation with different charged particles that induce different lesion densities. The classification into fast recruited proteins like DNA-PK or XRCC1 or slower recruited ones like 53BP1 or MDC1 helps to establish the hierarchical organisation of damage recognition and subsequent repair events. Additionally, motional analysis of DNA lesions induced by traversing particles proved information about the mobility of DSBs. Increased mobility or the absence of large scale motion has direct consequences on the formation of chromosomal translocations and, thus, on mechanisms of cancer formation. Charged particle microbeams offer the interesting perspective of precise nuclear or subnuclear targeting with a defined number of ions, avoiding the Poisson distribution of traversals inherent to broad beam experiments. With the help of the microbeam, geometrical patterns of traversing ions can be applied facilitating the analysis of spatial organisation of repair.

[1]  J. Aten,et al.  Dynamics of DNA Double-Strand Breaks Revealed by Clustering of Damaged Chromosome Domains , 2004, Science.

[2]  James L. Chen,et al.  Image-Based Modeling Reveals Dynamic Redistribution of DNA Damage into Nuclear Sub-Domains , 2007, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[3]  G. Taucher‐Scholz,et al.  Immediate Localized CDKN1A (p21) Radiation Response after Damage Produced by Heavy-Ion Tracks , 2000, Radiation research.

[4]  James G. McNally,et al.  Changes in chromatin structure and mobility in living cells at sites of DNA double-strand breaks , 2006, The Journal of cell biology.

[5]  J. Egly,et al.  Tools to study DNA repair: what's in the box? , 2008, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[6]  E. Rogakou,et al.  Megabase Chromatin Domains Involved in DNA Double-Strand Breaks in Vivo , 1999, The Journal of cell biology.

[7]  S. Kozubek,et al.  Chromatin dynamics during DSB repair. , 2007, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[8]  Karsten Rippe,et al.  Nuclear body movement is determined by chromatin accessibility and dynamics. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  M Scholz,et al.  Biological Imaging of Heavy Charged-Particle Tracks , 2003, Radiation research.

[10]  A. Houtsmuller,et al.  Analysis of DNA recombination and repair proteins in living cells by photobleaching microscopy. , 2006, Methods in enzymology.

[11]  N. Gueven,et al.  Live Cell Imaging of Heavy-Ion-Induced Radiation Responses by Beamline Microscopy , 2005, Radiation research.

[12]  G. Taucher‐Scholz,et al.  Direct Evidence for the Spatial Correlation between Individual Particle Traversals and Localized CDKN1A (p21) Response Induced by High-LET Radiation , 2001, Radiation research.

[13]  G. Taucher‐Scholz,et al.  The Absence of an Early Calcium Response to Heavy-Ion Radiation in Mammalian Cells , 2008, Radiation research.

[14]  R. Kanaar,et al.  DNA double-strand break repair and chromosome translocations. , 2006, DNA repair.

[15]  C. Fournier,et al.  Heavy ion microprobes: a unique tool for bystander research and other radiobiological applications , 2008 .

[16]  M. Durante,et al.  Live cell microscopy analysis of radiation-induced DNA double-strand break motion , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[17]  N. Lowndes,et al.  53BP1: function and mechanisms of focal recruitment. , 2009, Biochemical Society transactions.

[18]  Jared P. Stephens,et al.  Comparative analysis of different laser systems to study cellular responses to DNA damage in mammalian cells , 2009, Nucleic acids research.

[19]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[20]  P. Jeggo,et al.  The impact of a negligent G2/M checkpoint on genomic instability and cancer induction , 2007, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[21]  J. Bartek,et al.  Imaging of protein movement induced by chromosomal breakage: tiny ‘local’ lesions pose great ‘global’ challenges , 2005, Chromosoma.

[22]  G. Taucher‐Scholz,et al.  Characterization of CDKN1A (p21) binding to sites of heavy-ion-induced damage: colocalization with proteins involved in DNA repair , 2002, International journal of radiation biology.

[23]  Mitsuko Masutani,et al.  A requirement for PARP-1 for the assembly or stability of XRCC1 nuclear foci at sites of oxidative DNA damage. , 2003, Nucleic acids research.

[24]  E. Rogakou,et al.  DNA Double-stranded Breaks Induce Histone H2AX Phosphorylation on Serine 139* , 1998, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[25]  Burkhard Jakob,et al.  Autophosphorylation of DNA-PKCS regulates its dynamics at DNA double-strand breaks , 2007, The Journal of cell biology.

[26]  Burkhard Jakob,et al.  Targeted Irradiation of Mammalian Cells Using a Heavy-Ion Microprobe , 2006, Radiation research.

[27]  Jiri Bartek,et al.  Mdc1 couples DNA double‐strand break recognition by Nbs1 with its H2AX‐dependent chromatin retention , 2004, The EMBO journal.

[28]  G. Taucher‐Scholz,et al.  Interaction of heavy ions with nuclear chromatin: Spatiotemporal investigations of biological responses in a cellular environment , 2006 .

[29]  A. Murray,et al.  Interphase chromosomes undergo constrained diffusional motion in living cells , 1997, Current Biology.

[30]  Burkhard Jakob,et al.  Aprataxin, poly-ADP ribose polymerase 1 (PARP-1) and apurinic endonuclease 1 (APE1) function together to protect the genome against oxidative damage. , 2009, Human molecular genetics.

[31]  D. Brenner,et al.  Microbeam-integrated multiphoton imaging system. , 2008, The Review of scientific instruments.

[32]  S. Bekker-Jensen,et al.  Dynamic assembly and sustained retention of 53BP1 at the sites of DNA damage are controlled by Mdc1/NFBD1 , 2005, The Journal of cell biology.

[33]  M. Cornforth,et al.  Perspectives on the formation of radiation-induced exchange aberrations. , 2006, DNA repair.

[34]  T. Cremer,et al.  DNA-repair protein distribution along the tracks of energetic ions. , 2006, Radiation Protection Dosimetry.

[35]  G. Taucher‐Scholz,et al.  Ion Irradiation as a Tool to Reveal the Spatiotemporal Dynamics of DNA Damage Response Processes , 2006 .

[36]  J. Aten,et al.  Induction of linear tracks of DNA double-strand breaks by α-particle irradiation of cells , 2008, Nature Methods.

[37]  G. Kraft,et al.  Calculations of heavy-ion track structure. , 1995, Radiation and environmental biophysics.

[38]  G. Taucher‐Scholz,et al.  Positional Stability of Damaged Chromatin Domains along Radiation Tracks in Mammalian Cells , 2009, Radiation research.

[39]  S. Costes,et al.  Stochastic properties of radiation-induced DSB: DSB distributions in large scale chromatin loops, the HPRT gene and within the visible volumes of DNA repair foci , 2008, International journal of radiation biology.

[40]  P. Jeggo,et al.  ATM signaling facilitates repair of DNA double-strand breaks associated with heterochromatin. , 2008, Molecular cell.