van der Waals and hygroscopic forces of adhesion generated by spider capture threads
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] B. Opell,et al. Evolution of adhesive mechanisms in cribellar spider prey capture thread: evidence for van der Waals and hygroscopic forces , 2002 .
[2] Jim Hardie,et al. THE ORGANS OF ADHESION IN THE APHID MEGOURA VICIAE , 1988 .
[3] D. Ginzinger,et al. Silk Properties Determined by Gland-Specific Expression of a Spider Fibroin Gene Family , 1996, Science.
[4] R. Full,et al. Adhesive force of a single gecko foot-hair , 2000, Nature.
[5] N. Platnick,et al. Towards a Phylogeny of Entelegyne Spiders (Araneae, Araneomorphae, Entelegynae) , 1999 .
[6] B. Opell,et al. Changes in spinning anatomy and thread stickiness associated with the origin of orb-weaving spiders☆ , 1999 .
[7] W. Barnes,et al. Adhesion and Detachment of the Toe Pads of Tree Frogs , 1991 .
[8] Stanislav N. Gorb,et al. The design of the fly adhesive pad: distal tenent setae are adapted to the delivery of an adhesive secretion , 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.
[9] M B Hinman,et al. Isolation of a clone encoding a second dragline silk fibroin. Nephila clavipes dragline silk is a two-protein fiber. , 1992, The Journal of biological chemistry.
[10] B. Opell,et al. Economics of spider orb-webs: the benefits of producing adhesive capture thread and of recycling silk , 1998 .
[11] Y. Jiao,et al. Adhesion measured on the attachment pads of Tettigonia viridissima (Orthoptera, insecta). , 2000, The Journal of experimental biology.
[12] B. Opell. HOW SPIDER ANATOMY AND THREAD CONFIGURATION SHAPE THE STICKINESS OF CRIBELLAR PREY CAPTURE THREADS , 2002 .
[13] R. Zahradník,et al. Intermolecular Complexes: The Role of Van Der Waals Systems in Physical Chemistry and in the Biodisciplines , 1988 .
[14] B. Opell. Increased stickiness of prey capture threads accompanying web reduction in the spider family Uloboridae , 1994 .
[15] R. Lewis,et al. Molecular architecture and evolution of a modular spider silk protein gene. , 2000, Science.
[16] W. Eberhard,et al. ULTRASTRUCTURE OF CRIBELLATE SILK OF NINE SPECIES I N EIGHT FAMILIES AND POSSIBLE TAXONOMIC IMPLICATION S (ARANEAE : AMAUROBIIDAE, DEINOPIDAE, DESIDAE , DICTYNIDAE, FILISTATIDAE, HYPOCHILIDAE, STIPHIDIIDAE, TENGELLIDAE) , 1993 .
[17] David M. Green,et al. Adhesion and the Toe-pads of Treefrogs , 1981 .
[18] R. Full,et al. Evidence for van der Waals adhesion in gecko setae , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[19] J. Gosline,et al. The mechanical design of spider silks: from fibroin sequence to mechanical function. , 1999, The Journal of experimental biology.
[20] R. Lewis,et al. Evidence from flagelliform silk cDNA for the structural basis of elasticity and modular nature of spider silks. , 1998, Journal of molecular biology.
[21] J. Bond,et al. EXPLORING FUNCTIONAL ASSOCIATIONS BETWEEN SPIDER CRIBELLA AND CALAMISTRA , 2000 .
[22] H. Peters. The spinning apparatus of Uloboridae in relation to the structure and construction of capture threads (Arachnida, Araneida) , 1984, Zoomorphology.
[23] B. Opell. Factors governing the stickiness of cribellar prey capture threads in the spider family Uloboridae , 1994, Journal of morphology.
[24] B. Opell. The ability of spider cribellar prey capture thread to hold insects with different surface features , 1994 .
[25] S. Emerson,et al. Toe pad morphology and mechanisms of sticking in frogs , 1980 .
[26] G. Walker,et al. The adhesive organ of the blowfly, Calliphora vomitoria: a functional approach (Diptera: Calliphoridae) , 1985 .
[27] B. Opell. Ontogenetic changes in cribellum spigot number and cribellar prey capture thread stickiness in the spider family Uloboridae , 1995, Journal of morphology.
[28] R. K. Rose,et al. Volar adhesive pads of the feathertail glider, Acrobates pygmaeus (Marsupialia; Acrobatidae) , 1999 .
[29] B. Opell. Do static electric forces contribute to the stickiness of a spider's cribellar prey capture threads? , 1995 .
[30] B. Opell. CRIBELLUM AND CALAMISTRUM ONTOGENY IN THE SPIDER FAMILY ULOBORIDAE: LINKING FUNCTIONALLY RELATED BUT SEPARATE SILK SPINNING FEATURES , 2001 .
[31] William A. Wakeham,et al. The Forces Between Molecules , 1987 .
[32] Hans M. Peters,et al. Fine Structure and Function of Capture Threads , 1987 .
[33] M. Townley,et al. Comparative study of orb web hygroscopicity and adhesive spiral composition in three araneid spiders , 1991 .
[34] J. Bond,et al. TESTING ADAPTIVE RADIATION AND KEY INNOVATION HYPOTHESES IN SPIDERS , 1998, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[35] R. Foelix,et al. The biology of spiders. , 1987 .
[36] T. Eisner,et al. Defense by foot adhesion in a beetle (Hemisphaerota cyanea). , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[37] Thomas A. McMahon,et al. Biomechanics of the movable pretarsal adhesive organ in ants and bees , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[38] H. W. Levi,et al. Systematics and Evolution of Spiders (Araneae) , 1991 .
[39] Nigel E. Stork,et al. Experimental Analysis of Adhesion of Chrysolina Polita (Chrysomelidae: Coleoptera) on a Variety of Surfaces , 1980 .
[40] B. Opell,et al. The material cost and stickiness of capture threads and the evolution of orb‐weaving spiders , 1997 .