van der Waals and hygroscopic forces of adhesion generated by spider capture threads

SUMMARY Cribellar thread is the most primitive type of sticky prey capture thread found in aerial spider webs. Its outer surface is formed of thousands of fine fibrils that issue from a cribellum spinning field. The fibrils of primitive cribellar thread are cylindrical, whereas those of derived threads have nodes. Cribellar threads snag on insect setae but also adhere to smooth surfaces. A previous study showed empirically that cylindrical fibrils use only van der Waals forces to stick to smooth surfaces, as their stickiness is the same under different humidity. By contrast, noded fibrils are stickier under high humidity, where they are presumed to adsorb atmospheric water and implement hygroscopic (capillary) adhesion. Here, we model thread stickiness according to these two adhesive mechanisms. These models equate stickiness with the force necessary to overcome the adhesion of fibril contact points in a narrow band along each edge of the contact surface and to initiate peeling of the thread from the surface. Modeled and measured thread stickiness values are similar, supporting the operation of the hypothesized adhesive forces and portraying an important transition in the evolution of spider threads. Cribellar threads initially relied only on van der Waals forces to stick to smooth surfaces. The appearance of fibril nodes introduced hydrophilic sites that implemented hygroscopic force and increased thread stickiness under intermediate and high humidity.

[1]  B. Opell,et al.  Evolution of adhesive mechanisms in cribellar spider prey capture thread: evidence for van der Waals and hygroscopic forces , 2002 .

[2]  Jim Hardie,et al.  THE ORGANS OF ADHESION IN THE APHID MEGOURA VICIAE , 1988 .

[3]  D. Ginzinger,et al.  Silk Properties Determined by Gland-Specific Expression of a Spider Fibroin Gene Family , 1996, Science.

[4]  R. Full,et al.  Adhesive force of a single gecko foot-hair , 2000, Nature.

[5]  N. Platnick,et al.  Towards a Phylogeny of Entelegyne Spiders (Araneae, Araneomorphae, Entelegynae) , 1999 .

[6]  B. Opell,et al.  Changes in spinning anatomy and thread stickiness associated with the origin of orb-weaving spiders☆ , 1999 .

[7]  W. Barnes,et al.  Adhesion and Detachment of the Toe Pads of Tree Frogs , 1991 .

[8]  Stanislav N. Gorb,et al.  The design of the fly adhesive pad: distal tenent setae are adapted to the delivery of an adhesive secretion , 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[9]  M B Hinman,et al.  Isolation of a clone encoding a second dragline silk fibroin. Nephila clavipes dragline silk is a two-protein fiber. , 1992, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[10]  B. Opell,et al.  Economics of spider orb-webs: the benefits of producing adhesive capture thread and of recycling silk , 1998 .

[11]  Y. Jiao,et al.  Adhesion measured on the attachment pads of Tettigonia viridissima (Orthoptera, insecta). , 2000, The Journal of experimental biology.

[12]  B. Opell HOW SPIDER ANATOMY AND THREAD CONFIGURATION SHAPE THE STICKINESS OF CRIBELLAR PREY CAPTURE THREADS , 2002 .

[13]  R. Zahradník,et al.  Intermolecular Complexes: The Role of Van Der Waals Systems in Physical Chemistry and in the Biodisciplines , 1988 .

[14]  B. Opell Increased stickiness of prey capture threads accompanying web reduction in the spider family Uloboridae , 1994 .

[15]  R. Lewis,et al.  Molecular architecture and evolution of a modular spider silk protein gene. , 2000, Science.

[16]  W. Eberhard,et al.  ULTRASTRUCTURE OF CRIBELLATE SILK OF NINE SPECIES I N EIGHT FAMILIES AND POSSIBLE TAXONOMIC IMPLICATION S (ARANEAE : AMAUROBIIDAE, DEINOPIDAE, DESIDAE , DICTYNIDAE, FILISTATIDAE, HYPOCHILIDAE, STIPHIDIIDAE, TENGELLIDAE) , 1993 .

[17]  David M. Green,et al.  Adhesion and the Toe-pads of Treefrogs , 1981 .

[18]  R. Full,et al.  Evidence for van der Waals adhesion in gecko setae , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  J. Gosline,et al.  The mechanical design of spider silks: from fibroin sequence to mechanical function. , 1999, The Journal of experimental biology.

[20]  R. Lewis,et al.  Evidence from flagelliform silk cDNA for the structural basis of elasticity and modular nature of spider silks. , 1998, Journal of molecular biology.

[21]  J. Bond,et al.  EXPLORING FUNCTIONAL ASSOCIATIONS BETWEEN SPIDER CRIBELLA AND CALAMISTRA , 2000 .

[22]  H. Peters The spinning apparatus of Uloboridae in relation to the structure and construction of capture threads (Arachnida, Araneida) , 1984, Zoomorphology.

[23]  B. Opell Factors governing the stickiness of cribellar prey capture threads in the spider family Uloboridae , 1994, Journal of morphology.

[24]  B. Opell The ability of spider cribellar prey capture thread to hold insects with different surface features , 1994 .

[25]  S. Emerson,et al.  Toe pad morphology and mechanisms of sticking in frogs , 1980 .

[26]  G. Walker,et al.  The adhesive organ of the blowfly, Calliphora vomitoria: a functional approach (Diptera: Calliphoridae) , 1985 .

[27]  B. Opell Ontogenetic changes in cribellum spigot number and cribellar prey capture thread stickiness in the spider family Uloboridae , 1995, Journal of morphology.

[28]  R. K. Rose,et al.  Volar adhesive pads of the feathertail glider, Acrobates pygmaeus (Marsupialia; Acrobatidae) , 1999 .

[29]  B. Opell Do static electric forces contribute to the stickiness of a spider's cribellar prey capture threads? , 1995 .

[30]  B. Opell CRIBELLUM AND CALAMISTRUM ONTOGENY IN THE SPIDER FAMILY ULOBORIDAE: LINKING FUNCTIONALLY RELATED BUT SEPARATE SILK SPINNING FEATURES , 2001 .

[31]  William A. Wakeham,et al.  The Forces Between Molecules , 1987 .

[32]  Hans M. Peters,et al.  Fine Structure and Function of Capture Threads , 1987 .

[33]  M. Townley,et al.  Comparative study of orb web hygroscopicity and adhesive spiral composition in three araneid spiders , 1991 .

[34]  J. Bond,et al.  TESTING ADAPTIVE RADIATION AND KEY INNOVATION HYPOTHESES IN SPIDERS , 1998, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[35]  R. Foelix,et al.  The biology of spiders. , 1987 .

[36]  T. Eisner,et al.  Defense by foot adhesion in a beetle (Hemisphaerota cyanea). , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[37]  Thomas A. McMahon,et al.  Biomechanics of the movable pretarsal adhesive organ in ants and bees , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[38]  H. W. Levi,et al.  Systematics and Evolution of Spiders (Araneae) , 1991 .

[39]  Nigel E. Stork,et al.  Experimental Analysis of Adhesion of Chrysolina Polita (Chrysomelidae: Coleoptera) on a Variety of Surfaces , 1980 .

[40]  B. Opell,et al.  The material cost and stickiness of capture threads and the evolution of orb‐weaving spiders , 1997 .