Augment Bone Graft Products Compare Favorably With Autologous Bone Graft in an Ovine Model of Lumbar Interbody Spine Fusion

Study Design. This study was designed to determine whether Augment Bone Graft (Augment, Biomimetic Therapeutics, Inc., Franklin, TN) and Augment Injectable Bone Graft (Augment Injectable, Biomimetic Therapeutics, Inc., Franklin, TN), 2 combination devices comprising recombinant human platelet-derived growth factor-BB and &bgr;-tricalcium phosphate–containing matrices, promote bone bridging in an ovine model of lumbar spine fusion. Autologous bone graft (autograft) was used as a positive control. Objective. The purpose of this study was to determine the ability of Augment products to promote fusion of the L2–L3 and L4–L5 vertebral bodies in an ovine model. Summary of Background Data. In interbody spine fusion, the intervertebral disc is removed and a spacer is inserted for support and to facilitate bone growth. The fusion is commonly enhanced with grafts. Autograft is the “gold standard” but it has limitations including availability and donor-site morbidity. Synthetic graft substitutes eliminate these complications. Augment products are combination devices including recombinant human platelet-derived growth factor-BB, a well-characterized chemotactic, mitogenic, and proangiogenic protein essential in wound and bone healing. Methods. Twenty-two sheep received an uninstrumented, double-level, interbody lumbar spinal fusion procedure using a polyetheretherketone spacer, which was either empty or packed with iliac crest autograft, Augment or Augment Injectable. The same treatment was used at both levels. Animals were 24 weeks after surgery, and fusion was assessed by micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) and histology. Results. Micro-CT and histologic assessment of fusion revealed that empty controls had significantly lower fusion rates. No differences were detected among autografts, Augment, and Augment Injectable–treated specimens. Residual &bgr;-tricalcium phosphate particles embedded in the newly formed bone were visible in Augment- and Augment Injectable–treated specimens. Conclusion. Augment-treated specimens had the highest fusion scores. Treatment with either of the Augment products significantly promoted interbody spine fusion compared with empty spacers and was equivalent to autograft-induced fusion. No adverse events were noted.

[1]  R. Delamarter,et al.  Spinal Fusion in the United States: Analysis of Trends From 1998 to 2008 , 2012, Spine.

[2]  Emily M. Lindley,et al.  Evaluation of ABM/P-15 versus autogenous bone in an ovine lumbar interbody fusion model , 2010, European Spine Journal.

[3]  A. Younger,et al.  Prospective Clinical Pilot Trial in a Single Cohort Group of rhPDGF in Foot Arthrodeses , 2010, Foot & ankle international.

[4]  J. R. Parsons,et al.  Recombinant human platelet‐derived growth factor BB (rhPDGF‐BB) and beta‐tricalcium phosphate/collagen matrix enhance fracture healing in a diabetic rat model , 2009, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[5]  D. Moore,et al.  Recombinant human platelet-derived growth factor-BB augmentation of new-bone formation in a rat model of distraction osteogenesis. , 2009, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[6]  N. Crawford,et al.  Bioresorbable Polylactide Interbody Implants in an Ovine Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Model: Three-Year Results , 2008, Spine.

[7]  S. Lynch,et al.  Accelerated fracture healing in the geriatric, osteoporotic rat with recombinant human platelet‐derived growth factor‐bb and an injectable beta‐tricalcium phosphate/collagen matrix , 2008, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[8]  A. Turner,et al.  Efficacy of silicated calcium phosphate graft in posterolateral lumbar fusion in sheep. , 2007, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[9]  Joseph D. Smucker,et al.  Use of Recombinant Human Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 as an Adjunct in Posterolateral Lumbar Spine Fusion: A Prospective CT-Scan Analysis at One and Two Years , 2006, Journal of spinal disorders & techniques.

[10]  Eleftherios Tsiridis,et al.  Bone substitutes: an update. , 2005, Injury.

[11]  Jonathan N Grauer,et al.  Animal models for spinal fusion. , 2005, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[12]  N. Crawford,et al.  In vivo evaluation of bioresorbable polylactide implants for cervical graft containment in an ovine spinal fusion model. , 2004, Neurosurgical focus.

[13]  A. Turner,et al.  Evaluation of 70/30 poly (L-lactide-co-D,L-lactide) for use as a resorbable interbody fusion cage. , 2002, Journal of neurosurgery.

[14]  H. Shimizu,et al.  Anatomical analysis of different hemispherotomy procedures based on dissection of cadaveric brains. , 2002, Journal of neurosurgery.

[15]  J. Michael Kabo,et al.  Histologic Evaluation of the Efficacy of rhBMP-2 Compared With Autograft Bone in Sheep Spinal Anterior Interbody Fusion , 2002, Spine.

[16]  C. D. Ray,et al.  Symposium: A Critical Discrepancy—A Criteria of Successful Arthrodesis Following Interbody Spinal Fusions , 2001, Spine.

[17]  J M Toth,et al.  Direct Current Electrical Stimulation Increases the Fusion Rate of Spinal Fusion Cages , 2000, Spine.

[18]  S. Boden,et al.  Laparoscopic anterior spinal arthrodesis with rhBMP-2 in a titanium interbody threaded cage , 1998 .

[19]  J. Goulet,et al.  Autogenous Iliac Crest Bone Graft: Complications and Functional Assessment , 1997, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[20]  L. Claes,et al.  Anatomy of the sheep spine and its comparison to the human spine , 1997, The Anatomical record.

[21]  S. Boden,et al.  Biologic Enhancement of Spinal Fusion , 1995, The Orthopedic clinics of North America.

[22]  J. Haselkorn,et al.  Patient outcomes after lumbar spinal fusions. , 1992, JAMA.

[23]  R E Booth,et al.  Harvesting Autogenous Iliac Bone Grafts: A Review of Complications and Techniques , 1989, Spine.

[24]  A. Turner,et al.  Polyetheretherketone as a biomaterial for spinal applications. , 2006, Biomaterials.

[25]  A. Vaccaro,et al.  The use of allograft bone and cages in fractures of the cervical, thoracic, and lumbar spine. , 2002, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.