Achieving data synergy: The socio-technical process of handling data

Good quality research depends on good quality data. In multidisciplinary projects with quantitative and qualitative data, it can be difficult to collect data and share it between partners with diverse backgrounds in a timely and useful way, limiting the ability of different disciplines to collaborate. This chapter will explore two examples of the impact of data collection and sharing on analysis in a recent Horizon 2020 project, RealValue. The main insight is that it is not only projects but also the processes within them such as data collection, sharing and analysis that are socio-technical. We shall examine two examples within the project—validating the models and triangulating the qualitative data—to examine data synergy across four dimensions: time (synchronising activities), people (managing and coordinating actors), technology (in this case focusing mainly on connectivity) and quality. Recommendations include developing a data protocol for the energy demand community built on these four dimensions.

[1]  Jan Hensen,et al.  Thermal comfort in residential buildings: Comfort values and scales for building energy simulation , 2009 .

[2]  E. Gabe-Thomas,et al.  The reality of cross-disciplinary energy research in the United Kingdom:a social science perspective , 2017 .

[3]  Phillip John Jones,et al.  Retrofitting existing housing: how far, how much? , 2013 .

[4]  Jenny Love,et al.  From social and technical to socio-technical: Designing integrated research on domestic energy use , 2015 .

[5]  Olivia Guerra-Santin,et al.  Monitoring the performance of low energy dwellings: Two UK case studies , 2013 .

[6]  Olivia Guerra-Santin,et al.  Development of Dutch occupancy and heating profiles for building simulation , 2017 .

[7]  Kirsten Gram-Hanssen,et al.  Efficient technologies or user behaviour, which is the more important when reducing households’ energy consumption? , 2013 .

[8]  Kristoffer Negendahl,et al.  Building performance simulation in the early design stage: An introduction to integrated dynamic models , 2015 .

[9]  P. Stern,et al.  Integrating social science in energy research , 2015 .

[10]  Jan Hensen,et al.  Integrated building performance simulation: Progress, prospects and requirements , 2015 .

[11]  Kathryn B. Janda,et al.  A middle-out approach for improving energy performance in buildings , 2013 .

[12]  Faye Wade,et al.  Understanding the missing middlemen of domestic heating: Installers as a community of professional practice in the United Kingdom , 2016 .

[13]  E. McKenna,et al.  Simulating residential demand response: Improving socio-technical assumptions in activity-based models of energy demand , 2018 .

[14]  Ian Richardson,et al.  A high-resolution domestic building occupancy model for energy demand simulations , 2008 .

[15]  Harriet Bulkeley,et al.  Peak electricity demand and the flexibility of everyday life , 2014 .

[16]  Donal Finn,et al.  Lumped Parameter Building Model Calibration using Particle Swarm Optimization , 2016 .

[17]  C. Foulds,et al.  Creating an interdisciplinary energy lexicon: Working with terminology differences in support of better energy policy , 2017 .

[18]  Catalina Spataru,et al.  How to monitor people ‘smartly’ to help reducing energy consumption in buildings? , 2014 .

[19]  Jacquelin Burgess,et al.  Pathways to Interdisciplinarity: A technical report exploring collaborating interdisciplinary working in the Transition Pathways consortium , 2009 .

[20]  Adrian Leaman,et al.  Evaluating housing performance in relation to human behaviour: new challenges , 2010 .

[21]  H. Dowlatabadi,et al.  Models of Decision Making and Residential Energy Use , 2007, Renewable Energy.