SUMMARYDesign parameters selection in the multimodel adaptive control based on switching and tuning will beinvestigated. Some design parameters like number of " xed and adaptive models, forgetting factor andminimum time delay between switchings will be considered. A recently developed parameter adaptationalgorithm based on closed-loop output error will be compared with the classical least-squares predictionerror algorithm in the multimodel adaptive control. The e! ects of these parameters on the performance intracking and in regulation of a # exible transmission system will be studied via several simulation examples.Copyright ! 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. KEY WORDS: adaptive control; multimodel; switching; closed-loop identi " cation 1. INTRODUCTIONThe plants subjected to abrupt and large parameter variations are generally very di$ cult tocontrol. A classical adaptive controller or a " xed robust controller encounter the di$ culties tosolve this problem. An adaptive controller is not fast enough to follow the parameter variationsand unacceptable transients occur. Whereas a " xed robust controller normally leads to poorperformances because of large uncertainties.A solution based on switching between di! erent controllers for this type of plants has beenprobably proposed for the " rst time in Reference [1]. The main problem of switching is to decidewhen a controller should be switched to the plant. Some authors proposed a predeterminedswitching sequence [2 }4] but the multimodel approach seems m ore interesting. This approachbased on multiple models and switching will allow the transient responses to be improved in thepresence of large and fast parametric variations [5 }7]. In this approach, we suppose that a set ofmodels for di! erent operating points is a priori known. Then at every instant a controllercorresponding to the model yielding the minimum of a performance index is used to compute the
[1]
Kumpati S. Narendra,et al.
Adaptive control of discrete-time systems using multiple models
,
1998,
Proceedings of the 37th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (Cat. No.98CH36171).
[2]
A. Stephen Morse,et al.
Control Using Logic-Based Switching
,
1997
.
[3]
Ioan Doré Landau,et al.
An output error recursive algorithm for unbiased identification in closed loop
,
1996,
Autom..
[4]
Ioan Doré Landau,et al.
A Flexible Transmission System as a Benchmark for Robust Digital Control
,
1995,
Eur. J. Control.
[5]
Alireza Karimi.
Conception des régulateurs numériques robustes et adaptatifs
,
1997
.
[6]
Ioan Doré Landau,et al.
Robust adaptive control of a flexible transmission system using multiple models
,
2000,
IEEE Trans. Control. Syst. Technol..
[7]
Kumpati S. Narendra,et al.
Adaptive control using multiple models
,
1997,
IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..
[8]
Kumpati S. Narendra,et al.
Improving transient response of adaptive control systems using multiple models and switching
,
1994
.
[9]
Daniel E. Miller.
Adaptive stabilization using a nonlinear time-varying controller
,
1994,
IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..
[10]
A. Morse,et al.
Applications of hysteresis switching in parameter adaptive control
,
1992
.
[11]
B. Barmish,et al.
Adaptive stabilization of linear systems via switching control
,
1986,
1986 25th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.
[12]
E. Davison,et al.
An adaptive controller which provides Lyapunov stability
,
1989
.
[13]
Ioan Doré Landau,et al.
Comparison of the closed-loop identfication methods in terms of the bias distribution
,
1998
.