Mandatory Second Opinion in Surgical Pathology Referral Material: Clinical Consequences of Major Disagreements
暂无分享,去创建一个
Jamie Weydert | J. Weydert | Michael B Cohen | Michael B. Cohen | Elizabeth Manion | Elizabeth M. Manion
[1] J. S. Tsung. Institutional Pathology Consultation , 2004, The American journal of surgical pathology.
[2] W. Frable,et al. Surgical pathology--second reviews, institutional reviews, audits, and correlations: what's out there? Error or diagnostic variation? , 2006, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.
[3] Monica Morrow,et al. Changes in breast cancer therapy because of pathology second opinions , 2002, Annals of Surgical Oncology.
[4] W. Frankel,et al. The value of second opinion in gastrointestinal and liver pathology. , 2001, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.
[5] A. Abt,et al. The effect of interinstitution anatomic pathology consultation on patient care. , 1995, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.
[6] J. Epstein,et al. Consensus conference on second opinions in diagnostic anatomic pathology. Who, What, and When. , 2000, American journal of clinical pathology.
[7] D. Miller,et al. Pathology Slide Review in Gynecologic Oncology , 1998, Obstetrics and gynecology.
[8] L. Layfield,et al. Prevalence of inter-institutional anatomic pathology slide review: a survey of current practice. , 2000, The American journal of surgical pathology.
[9] R. Sirota. Defining error in anatomic pathology. , 2006, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.
[10] A. Patchefsky,et al. Histopathologic review of prostate biopsies from patients referred to a comprehensive cancer center , 1998, Cancer.
[11] I. Ackerman,et al. Slide review in gynecologic oncology ensures completeness of reporting and diagnostic accuracy. , 2003, Gynecologic oncology.
[12] A. Munkarah,et al. Interinstitutional Surgical Pathology Review in Gynecologic Oncology I. Cancer in Endometrial Curettings and Biopsies , 1998, International journal of gynecological pathology : official journal of the International Society of Gynecological Pathologists.
[13] R. Pearcey,et al. An analysis of the impact of pathology review in gynecologic cancer. , 2000, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.
[14] A. Cheung,et al. Pathology slide review in gynecologic oncology: routine or selective? , 1999, Gynecologic oncology.
[15] Interinstitutional Surgical Pathology Review in Gynecologic Oncology II. Endometrial Cancer in Hysterectomy Specimens , 1998, International journal of gynecological pathology : official journal of the International Society of Gynecological Pathologists.
[16] J. Silverman,et al. Critical values in surgical pathology. , 2004, American journal of clinical pathology.
[17] R. Sirota,et al. Derivation of a new hematopoietic cell line with endothelial features from a patient with transformed myeloproliferative syndrome , 2000, Cancer.
[18] A. Selman,et al. Quality assurance of second opinion pathology in gynecologic oncology. , 1999, Obstetrics and gynecology.
[19] R. Kempson,et al. Consultations in surgical pathology , 1993 .
[20] P. Walsh,et al. Clinical and cost impact of second-opinion pathology. Review of prostate biopsies prior to radical prostatectomy. , 1996, The American journal of surgical pathology.
[21] W. Westra,et al. The impact of second opinion surgical pathology on the practice of head and neck surgery: A decade experience at a large referral hospital , 2002, Head & neck.
[22] D. Theodorescu,et al. Impact of second opinion pathology in the definitive management of patients with bladder carcinoma , 2001, Cancer.
[23] K. Maclennan,et al. Surgical pathological second opinion in thyroid malignancy: impact on patients' management and prognosis. , 2005, European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology.