Process Documentation in Sloyd: Pilot Study of the 'Talking Tools' Application

Abstract—Students work in sloyd [slojd] class represents unique areas of learning. The creative, hands-on design work, as well as a mix of both individual and collaborative processes, provide options for developing multiple skills. But these multilevel learning processes are difficult to capture. This study explores how a mobile application, the Talking Tools (TT), are used for documenting students own reflections during sloyd class. The study targets what, why, and when a group of teacher students (N=11) use TT for microblogging about their work. Their subjective reflections from a questionnaire using open-ended questions are used for validating earlier analysis of their blogs created using TT. As TT is still under development, the objective of exploring students’ documentation behaviour with the application, is to understand what the added value of TT could be for capturing various areas of learning. Suggestions for teacher guidelines for implementing TT are discussed based on the findings. The article also describes the development of the application in terms of the inter-disciplinary cooperation and collaboration. The TPACK framework is used for illustrating the know-how transcendence between collaborators in the TT application development.

[1]  E. Deci,et al.  Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: Classic Definitions and New Directions. , 2000, Contemporary educational psychology.

[2]  Caroline Spencer,et al.  ‘Qualitative Data Analysis with NVivo’ Pat Bazeley, Sage Publications Limited, 2007. , 2015 .

[3]  L. S. Vygotskiĭ,et al.  Mind in society : the development of higher psychological processes , 1978 .

[4]  Martin Oliver,et al.  Handbook of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK) for educators , 2011 .

[5]  Roger Säljö,et al.  Literacy, Digital Literacy and Epistemic Practices: The Co-Evolution of Hybrid Minds and External Memory Systems , 2012 .

[6]  Dorian Peters,et al.  Interface Design for Learning: Design Strategies for Learning Experiences , 2013 .

[7]  Roger Säljö,et al.  Digital tools and challenges to institutional traditions of learning: technologies, social memory and the performative nature of learning , 2010, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[8]  Sinikka Pöllänen,et al.  Contextualising Craft: Pedagogical Models for Craft Education. , 2009 .

[9]  P. Pintrich The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. , 2000 .

[10]  Mia Porko-Hudd,et al.  Transmedia Storybuilding in Sloyd. , 2013 .

[11]  S. Naidu Enabling Time, Pace, and Place Independence , 2007 .

[12]  Kristi Jackson,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis with NVivo , 2007 .

[13]  L. Lindström,et al.  Nordic visual arts education in transition : a research review , 2009 .

[14]  Bowling Green State Tweeting for Learning : A Critical Analysis of Research on Microblogging in Education Published in 2008-2011 , 2015 .

[15]  Theo van Leeuwen,et al.  Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design , 1996 .