Implicit Ambient Surface Information: From Personal to Interpersonal

We have proposed a novel concept: “Implicit Ambient Surface Information” (IASI), which is based on the notion that information on the surface of an agent (e.g., bodies and machines) is implicitly processed and affects collaborations between agents. To utilize IASI, it is necessary to develop technologies and analysis methods that can recode and decode implicit signals that appear on the surface of the body without disrupting the intended actions of users. We sought to gain insight into IASI and to utilize it to establish intelligent information processing systems by measuring implicit body movements, physiological responses, and mental states and thereby accumulate scientific knowledge for theoretical advances. We have applied this concept to measuring physiological states and body movement of a single athlete, and here describe a few studies, and then propose future directions, with greater focus on the mental and interpersonal aspects of IASI. Author

[1]  J. Stainer,et al.  The Emotions , 1922, Nature.

[2]  M. Polanyi Chapter 7 – The Tacit Dimension , 1997 .

[3]  M. Csíkszentmihályi Flow and the Foundations of Positive Psychology , 2014 .

[4]  Marco Liuni,et al.  DAVID: An open-source platform for real-time transformation of infra-segmental emotional cues in running speech , 2017, Behavior Research Methods.

[5]  Mukesh Dhamala,et al.  Hyperscanning : Simultaneous fMRI during Linked Social Interactions , 2001 .

[6]  U. Alon,et al.  The mirror game as a paradigm for studying the dynamics of two people improvising motion together , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[7]  Günther Knoblich,et al.  The Social Nature of Perception and Action , 2006 .

[8]  Katsumi Watanabe,et al.  Covert digital manipulation of vocal emotion alter speakers’ emotional states in a congruent direction , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  H. Bekkering,et al.  Joint action: bodies and minds moving together , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[10]  Katsumi Watanabe Teaching as a Dynamic Phenomenon with Interpersonal Interactions , 2013 .

[11]  Judee K. Burgoon,et al.  Effects of preinteraction expectancies and target communication on perceiver reciprocity and compensation in dyadic interaction , 1995 .

[12]  S. Shimojo,et al.  Interpersonal body and neural synchronization as a marker of implicit social interaction , 2012, Scientific Reports.

[13]  Jessica A. Sommerville,et al.  Shared representations between self and other: a social cognitive neuroscience view , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[14]  J. Kelso,et al.  From the Cover : The phi complex as a neuromarker of human social coordination , 2007 .

[15]  A. Roepstorff,et al.  The two-brain approach: how can mutually interacting brains teach us something about social interaction? , 2012, Front. Hum. Neurosci..