The Philosophy of Critical Realism—An Opportunity for Information Systems Research

It is argued that recent research in the information systems field has tended to either emphasise the structural/collective dimension or the agency/individual dimension, not both. Structuration theory is a more recent attempt to address both agency and structure, however there are a number of issues with the use of structuration theory in information systems research, not the least of which is its lack of recognition of the temporal and longitudinal nature of information systems development. A relatively new philosophy, critical realism, provides the potential for a new approach to social investigations in its provision of an ontology for the analytical separation of structure and agency. The philosophy is introduced and its implications for sociological investigation are discussed.

[1]  C. Whitbeck,et al.  A Realist Theory of Science. , 1977 .

[2]  M. Reed,et al.  In Praise of Duality and Dualism: Rethinking Agency and Structure in Organizational Analysis , 1997 .

[3]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. , 1964 .

[4]  R. Bhaskar.  A realist theory of science , 1976 .

[5]  Elspeth Graham,et al.  Postmodernism and the Social Sciences , 1992 .

[6]  I. Craib.  Modern Social Theory: From Parsons to Habermas , 1985 .

[7]  Haridimos Tsoukasl.  Panoptic Reason and the Search for Totality: A Critical Assessment of the Critical Systems Perspective , 1992 .

[8]  K. Popper,et al.  The Open Society and Its Enemies , 1946 .

[9]  Pauline Marie Rosenau,et al.  Post-Modernism and the Social Sciences: Insights, Inroads, and Intrusions , 1991 .

[10]  E. Jantsch.  The design of inquiring systems,: by C. West Churchman New York, Basic Books, 1972. , 1972 .

[11]  Werner Ulrich,et al.  Can We Secure Future-Responsive Management Through Systems Thinking and Design? , 1994 .

[12]  S. Porter,et al.  Critical Realist Ethnography: The Case of Racism and Professionalism in a Medical Setting , 1993 .

[13]  R. Bhaskar.  Scientific Realism and Human Emancipation , 1986 .

[14]  Derek Layder,et al.  New Strategies in Social Research: An Introduction and Guide , 1993 .

[15]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Interpreting Information Systems in Organizations , 1993 .

[16]  C. West Churchman,et al.  Management Science: Science of Managing and Managing of Science , 1994 .

[17]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Interpretive case studies in IS research: nature and method , 1995 .

[18]  Douglas.  FOUR CONCEPTS OF SOCIAL STRUCTURE , 1989 .

[19]  Roy Bhaskar,et al.  Reclaiming Reality: A Critical Introduction to Contemporary Philosophy , 1989 .

[20]  Margaret S. Archer,et al.  Realist social theory: The morphogenetic cycle , 1997 .

[21]  Gordon Rowland.  Archetypes of systems design , 1995 .

[22]  Robert Chia,et al.  The Problem of Reflexivity in Organizational Research: Towards a Postmodern Science of Organization , 1996 .

[23]  Roy Bhaskar,et al.  Philosophy And The Idea Of Freedom , 1991 .

[24]  Jonathan H. Turner,et al.  Realist Social Theory: The Morphogenetic Approach.By Margaret S. Archer. Cambridge University Press, 354 pp , 1997 .

[25]  Karl R. Popper,et al.  The Open Society and Its Enemies , 1952 .

[26]  F. Quek,et al.  Qualitative research in information systems: time to be subjective? , 1997 .

[27]  Richard Whittington,et al.  Sociological Pluralism, Institutions and Managerial Agency , 1994 .

[28]  J. Searle.  The Construction of Social Reality , 1997 .

[29]  Andrew Sayer,et al.  Method in Social Science: A Realist Approach , 1984 .