A Survey of Practice Patterns in Concussion Assessment and Management.

OBJECTIVES: To identify methods used by athletic trainers to assess concussions and the use of that information to assist in return-to-play decisions and to determine athletic trainers' familiarity with new standardized methods of concussion assessment. DESIGN AND SETTING: A 21-item questionnaire was distributed to attendees of a minicourse at the 1999 National Athletic Trainers' Association Annual Meeting and Clinical Symposia entitled "Use of Standardized Assessment of Concussion (SAC) in the Immediate Sideline Evaluation of Injured Athletes." SUBJECTS: A total of 339 valid surveys were returned by the attendees of the minicourse. MEASUREMENTS: We used frequency analysis and descriptive statistics. RESULTS: Clinical examination (33%) and a symptom checklist (15.3%) were the most common evaluative tools used to assess concussions. The Colorado Guidelines (28%) were used more than other concussion management guidelines. Athletic trainers (34%) and team physicians (40%) were primarily responsible for making decisions regarding return to play. A large number of respondents (83.5%) believed that the use of a standardized method of concussion assessment provided more information than routine clinical and physical examination alone. CONCLUSIONS: Athletic trainers are using a variety of clinical tools to evaluate concussions in athletes. Clinical evaluation and collaboration with physicians still appear to be the primary methods used for return-to-play decisions. However, athletic trainers are beginning to use standardized methods of concussion to evaluate these injuries and to assist them in assessing the severity of injury and deciding when it is safe to return to play.

[1]  C. Armstrong,et al.  The effects of closed-head injury on postural sway. , 1992, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[2]  J. Goebel,et al.  Postural stability following mild head or whiplash injuries. , 1995, The American journal of otology.

[3]  Robert C. Cantu,et al.  Cerebral Concussion in Sport , 1992 .

[4]  M. Saling,et al.  Neuropsychological deficits following concussion. , 1996, Brain injury.

[5]  M R Lovell,et al.  Neuropsychological Assessment of the College Football Player , 1998, The Journal of head trauma rehabilitation.

[6]  J. P. Kelly,et al.  Standardized Assessment of Concussion in football players , 1997, Neurology.

[7]  D H Perrin,et al.  Alternative approaches to the assessment of mild head injury in athletes. , 1997, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[8]  J. Bailes,et al.  On the field evaluation of athletic head injuries. , 1998, Clinics in sports medicine.

[9]  D B McKeag,et al.  Relationship between concussion and neuropsychological performance in college football players. , 1999, JAMA.

[10]  Kevin M. Guskiewicz,et al.  Assessment of Mild Head Injury Using Measures of Balance and Cognition: A Case Study , 1997 .

[11]  R. Cantu.  Return to play guidelines after a head injury. , 1998, Clinics in sports medicine.

[12]  J. Kelly,et al.  Standardized Assessment of Concussion (SAC): On-Site Mental Status Evaluation of the Athlete , 1998, The Journal of head trauma rehabilitation.

[13]  W. Alves,et al.  Neuropsychological functioning and recovery after mild head injury in collegiate athletes. , 1996, Neurosurgery.

[14]  G. Geffen,et al.  Mild head injury and speed of information processing: a prospective study of professional rugby league players. , 1997, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.