Sentiment analysis as a measure of conservation culture in scientific literature

Culturomics is emerging as an important field within science, a way to measure attitudes and beliefs and their dynamics across time and space via quantitative analysis of digitized data from literature, news, film, social media, and more. Sentiment analysis is an emerging tool for culturomics that, within the last decade, has provided a means to quantify the polarity of attitudes expressed within various media. Conservation science is a crisis discipline and one in which accurate and effective communication are paramount to success. We investigated how conservation scientists communicate their findings through one of their primary media: scientific journal articles. We analysed 15,001 abstracts from papers published in conservation-focused journals published in the last 20 years, 1998-2017. Papers were categorized by year, focal taxa, and their conservation status; the mean sentiment scores were then extracted from the abstract using four lexicons (Jockers-Rinker, NRC, Bing et al., and AFINN). We found no annual trend in the sentiment scores of papers across conservation literature but analysis of absolute values suggested increasing polarization of language over time (i.e. less neutral). We also observed a trend towards increasing negativity along the spectrum of IUCN Red List categories (i.e. from Least Concern to Critically Endangered to Extinct), though this relationship was not significant. There were some clear differences in the sentiments with which research on different taxa were reported, however. For example, abstracts mentioning lobe finned fishes tended to have high sentiment scores, which we hypothesize may be related to the rediscovery of the coelacanth driving a positive narrative. Contrastingly, abstracts mentioning elasmobranchs had low scores, reflecting the negative sentiment score associated with the word "sharks". Sentiment analysis is an exciting frontier with applications in science and we suggest a new science-based lexicon be developed for applying this tool to conservation. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

[1]  Lei Zhang,et al.  Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining , 2017, Encyclopedia of Machine Learning and Data Mining.

[2]  S. Magle,et al.  Assessing online opinions of wildlife through social media , 2018 .

[3]  Jules Pretty,et al.  A 2018 Horizon Scan of Emerging Issues for Global Conservation and Biological Diversity. , 2018, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[4]  S. Basu,et al.  Book Review: Species on the Edge of Survival. International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Red List , 2011 .

[5]  S. Chamberlain,et al.  Taxonomic Information from Around the Web , 2015 .

[6]  Steven J. Cooke,et al.  Taxonomic bias and international biodiversity conservation research , 2017 .

[7]  Harry Eugene Stanley,et al.  Languages cool as they expand: Allometric scaling and the decreasing need for new words , 2012, Scientific Reports.

[9]  Albert Costa,et al.  Your Morals Depend on Language , 2014, PloS one.

[10]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[11]  Carol Tenopir,et al.  Measuring Total Reading of Journal Articles , 2006, D Lib Mag..

[12]  J. Lerner,et al.  Emotion and decision making. , 2015, Annual review of psychology.

[13]  Willem M Otte,et al.  Use of positive and negative words in scientific PubMed abstracts between 1974 and 2014: retrospective analysis , 2015, British Medical Journal.

[14]  V. Nguyen,et al.  Considerations for effective science communication , 2017 .

[15]  T. Hothorn,et al.  Simultaneous Inference in General Parametric Models , 2008, Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift.

[16]  James K. Sheppard,et al.  The Culture of Conservation Biologists: Show Me the Hope! , 2010 .

[17]  Rick Dale,et al.  Culturomics as a data playground for tests of selection: Mathematical approaches to detecting selection in word use. , 2016, Journal of theoretical biology.

[18]  M. Turner,et al.  A critical political ecology of human dimensions of climate change: Epistemology, ontology, and ethics , 2018 .

[19]  Hadley Wickham,et al.  ggplot2 - Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis (2nd Edition) , 2017 .

[20]  Christopher D. Manning,et al.  Advances in natural language processing , 2015, Science.

[21]  R. Wilson Balancing Emotion and Cognition: a Case for Decision Aiding in Conservation Efforts , 2008, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[22]  Eduard Szöcs,et al.  taxize: taxonomic search and retrieval in R , 2013, F1000Research.

[23]  David Robinson,et al.  tidytext: Text Mining and Analysis Using Tidy Data Principles in R , 2016, J. Open Source Softw..

[24]  Trond E. Jacobsen,et al.  The Collective Memory , 1980 .

[25]  Erez Lieberman Aiden,et al.  Quantitative Analysis of Culture Using Millions of Digitized Books , 2010, Science.

[26]  J. Clifford,et al.  The Theater of Fact and Its Critics@@@Writing Culture: The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography , 1986 .

[27]  C. Saunders The Emerging Field of Conservation Psychology , 2003 .

[28]  Beth S Robinson,et al.  Popular interest in vertebrates does not reflect extinction risk and is associated with bias in conservation investment , 2018, PloS one.

[29]  D. Fanelli Do Pressures to Publish Increase Scientists' Bias? An Empirical Support from US States Data , 2010, PloS one.

[30]  A. Lawrence,et al.  Emotional conflicts in rational forestry: Towards a research agenda for understanding emotions in environmental conflicts , 2013 .

[31]  M. Soulé What is Conservation Biology?A new synthetic discipline addresses the dynamics and problems of perturbed species, communities, and ecosystems , 1985 .

[32]  Ricardo A Correia,et al.  Conservation culturomics CONCEPTS AND QUESTIONS , 2016 .

[33]  Finn Årup Nielsen,et al.  A New ANEW: Evaluation of a Word List for Sentiment Analysis in Microblogs , 2011, #MSM.

[34]  J. S. Kotiaho,et al.  Alarmist by bad design: Strongly popularized unsubstantiated claims undermine credibility of conservation science , 2019, Rethinking Ecology.

[35]  S. Turvey,et al.  Increased dispositional optimism in conservation professionals , 2018, Biodiversity and Conservation.

[36]  J. Vucetich,et al.  Emotions and the Ethics of Consequence in Conservation Decisions: Lessons from Cecil the Lion , 2016 .

[37]  Robin I. M. Dunbar,et al.  Neocortex Size, Group Size, and the Evolution of Language , 1993, Current Anthropology.

[38]  Robert T. Lackey,et al.  Science, Scientists, and Policy Advocacy , 2007, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[39]  R. Connolly,et al.  Monitoring the environment and human sentiment on the Great Barrier Reef: Assessing the potential of collective sensing. , 2017, Journal of environmental management.

[40]  R. Dirzo,et al.  Biological annihilation via the ongoing sixth mass extinction signaled by vertebrate population losses and declines , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[41]  C. Neff The Jaws Effect: How movie narratives are used to influence policy responses to shark bites in Western Australia , 2015 .

[42]  Andrew E. Honsey,et al.  Reeling Them In: Initial Insight into the Factors Affecting Presentation Attendance at American Fisheries Society Meetings , 2018 .

[43]  Doaa Mohey El Din Mohamed Hussein,et al.  A survey on sentiment analysis challenges , 2016, Journal of King Saud University - Engineering Sciences.

[44]  Justin M. Nolan,et al.  THE LOVABLE, THE LOATHSOME, AND THE LIMINAL: EMOTIONALITY IN ETHNOZOOLOGICAL COGNITION , 2006 .

[45]  L. Ceríaco Human attitudes towards herpetofauna: The influence of folklore and negative values on the conservation of amphibians and reptiles in Portugal , 2012, Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine.

[46]  Ricardo A Correia,et al.  Internet scientific name frequency as an indicator of cultural salience of biodiversity , 2017 .

[47]  Katherine J. LaJeunesse Connette,et al.  Conservation Biology , 2009, The Quarterly review of biology.

[48]  N. Burgess,et al.  Exploring the international trade in African snakes not listed on CITES: highlighting the role of the internet and social media , 2018, Biodiversity and Conservation.

[49]  Carlo Strapparava,et al.  Time corpora: Epochs, opinions and changes , 2014, Knowl. Based Syst..

[50]  M. Barua,et al.  Factors affecting media coverage of species rediscoveries , 2016, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[51]  Saif Mohammad,et al.  CROWDSOURCING A WORD–EMOTION ASSOCIATION LEXICON , 2013, Comput. Intell..

[52]  G. Joo,et al.  Talking about Climate Change and Global Warming , 2015, PloS one.

[53]  Vasileios Lampos,et al.  The Expression of Emotions in 20th Century Books , 2013, PloS one.

[54]  D. Veríssimo,et al.  Black Stork Down: Military Discourses in Bird Conservation in Malta , 2015 .

[55]  J. Ragle,et al.  IUCN Red List of Threatened Species , 2010 .

[56]  P. Schultz,et al.  Conservation Means Behavior , 2011, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[57]  T. Brooks,et al.  Global Biodiversity Conservation Priorities , 2006, Science.

[58]  Ricardo A Correia,et al.  Nomenclature instability in species culturomic assessments: Why synonyms matter , 2018, Ecological Indicators.

[59]  Matthew L. Jockers,et al.  Extracts Sentiment and Sentiment-Derived Plot Arcs from Text , 2015 .

[60]  S. Connell,et al.  Let Scientific Writing Evolve, Not Stagnate. , 2018, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[61]  Douglas M. Bates,et al.  LINEAR AND NONLINEAR MIXED-EFFECTS MODELS , 1998 .

[62]  J. Vansina,et al.  Oral Tradition as History , 1987 .

[63]  Peng Lin,et al.  Public-Opinion Sentiment Analysis for Large Hydro Projects , 2016 .

[64]  P. Ehrlich,et al.  Accelerated modern human–induced species losses: Entering the sixth mass extinction , 2015, Science Advances.

[65]  Felipe Bravo-Marquez,et al.  Meta-level sentiment models for big social data analysis , 2014, Knowl. Based Syst..

[66]  M. Schwartz,et al.  Achieving Conservation Science that Bridges the Knowledge–Action Boundary , 2013, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[67]  B. Larson The war of the roses: demilitarizing invasion biology , 2005 .

[68]  Saif Mohammad,et al.  Examining Gender and Race Bias in Two Hundred Sentiment Analysis Systems , 2018, *SEMEVAL.

[69]  Wolff‐Michael Roth From gesture to scientific language , 2000 .

[70]  Robert J. Whittaker,et al.  Scientists and the media: the struggle for legitimacy in climate change and conservation science , 2005 .

[71]  D. Lindenmayer,et al.  Conservation science must engender hope to succeed. , 2011, Trends in ecology & evolution.