Digital originals: reproduction as a space for design

This paper reports findings from a qualitative study of a group of artists in the North of England. It focuses on the impact of digital technology on their printmaking and wider art practice. Four major themes emerge: apprenticeship, networks, authenticity and commodification. Each of the artists describes a long process of educational and professional apprenticeship. They reflect in detail on the value of networks of support not only in generating contacts for potential professional development but also in affirming their identity as an artist. Current practices around the production of Giclée prints are considered in detail and related to more general problems of what constitutes authentic work and the problems of commodification. After reporting findings from the qualitative study the paper presents initial concept design work around the notion of a "slow print". It also discusses an experience prototype that reveals rather than conceals digital practice. It considers the notion of an original as a social practice and positions reproduction as a space for design.

[1]  Kate Oakley,et al.  The art of innovation: How fine arts graduates contribute to innovation , 2008 .

[2]  Mark Blythe,et al.  Funology:From Usability to Enjoyment , 2003 .

[3]  Griffin Mead Woodworth PhD Candidate.  Hackers, Users, and Suits: Napster and Representations of Identity , 2004 .

[4]  Martin Gayford,et al.  A Bigger Message: Conversations with David Hockney , 2011 .

[5]  Rand W. Ressler,et al.  The ``Death-Effect'' in Art Prices: A Demand-Side Exploration , 2000 .

[6]  Mark Blythe,et al.  No Oil Painting: digital originals and slow prints , 2012 .

[7]  James Hunt.  Talk to Me: Design and the Communication between People and Objects , 2011 .

[8]  Kristina Höök,et al.  Sense and sensibility: evaluation and interactive art , 2003, CHI '03.

[9]  Margot Brereton,et al.  The lens of ludic engagement: evaluating participation in interactive art installations , 2007, ACM Multimedia.

[10]  Ann Morrison,et al.  Ethnography considered useful: situating criticality , 2010, OZCHI '10.

[11]  Francis Spufford,et al.  Cultural Babbage: Technology, Time and Invention , 1996 .

[12]  C. Robson,et al.  Real World Research: A Resource for Social Scientists and Practitioner-Researchers , 1993 .

[13]  Gustav Taxén,et al.  Introducing participatory design in museums , 2004, PDC 04.

[14]  Francis Spufford,et al.  Making the Match: Human Traces, Forensic Experts and the Public Imagination , 1996 .

[15]  Jeffrey Bardzell,et al.  Interaction criticism and aesthetics , 2009, CHI.

[16]  Paola Antonelli,et al.  Talk to me : design and the communication between people and objects , 2011 .

[17]  Peter C. Wright,et al.  The prayer companion: openness and specificity, materiality and spirituality , 2010, CHI.

[18]  K. Charmaz,et al.  Constructing Grounded Theory , 2014 .

[19]  R. Hughes.  The Shock of the New : Art and the Century of Change , 1980 .

[20]  James O Prochaska,et al.  A discussion with James O. Prochaska, PhD. Interview by Paul E. Terry. , 2012, American journal of health promotion : AJHP.

[21]  William Lidwell,et al.  Universal Principles of Design , 2003 .

[22]  Margaret A. Boden.  Aesthetics and interactive art , 2005, C&C '05.

[23]  Zadie Smith,et al.  The Autograph Man , 2002 .

[24]  Albrecht Schmidt,et al.  The drift table: designing for ludic engagement , 2004, CHI EA '04.

[25]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .

[26]  William W. Gaver.  The video window: my life with a ludic system , 2006, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[27]  Carl Honoré,et al.  In Praise of Slow : How a Worldwide Movement Is Challenging the Cult of Speed , 2004 .

[28]  Carlo Pedretti,et al.  Leonardo;: A study in chronology and style , 1973 .

[29]  Serge Bouchardon.  The rhetoric of interactive art works , 2008, DIMEA.