Granny and the robots: ethical issues in robot care for the elderly

The growing proportion of elderly people in society, together with recent advances in robotics, makes the use of robots in elder care increasingly likely. We outline developments in the areas of robot applications for assisting the elderly and their carers, for monitoring their health and safety, and for providing them with companionship. Despite the possible benefits, we raise and discuss six main ethical concerns associated with: (1) the potential reduction in the amount of human contact; (2) an increase in the feelings of objectification and loss of control; (3) a loss of privacy; (4) a loss of personal liberty; (5) deception and infantilisation; (6) the circumstances in which elderly people should be allowed to control robots. We conclude by balancing the care benefits against the ethical costs. If introduced with foresight and careful guidelines, robots and robotic technology could improve the lives of the elderly, reducing their dependence, and creating more opportunities for social interaction

[1]  H. Kazerooni.  The New Scientist , 1956, Nature.

[2]  E. Langer,et al.  The effects of choice and enhanced personal responsibility for the aged: a field experiment in an institutional setting. , 1976, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[3]  M. Boden.  Arti cial Intelligence and Natural Man , 1977 .

[4]  O. Schachter.  Human Dignity as a Normative Concept , 1983 .

[5]  Louis Scoma.  Protecting Privacy of Information , 1986 .

[6]  山田 豊.  Biographia Literaria 誕生の歴史 , 1992 .

[7]  A. Clark,et al.  The Extended Mind , 1998, Analysis.

[8]  H. Nissenbaum.  Protecting Privacy in an Information Age: The Problem of Privacy in Public , 1998, The Ethics of Information Technologies.

[9]  L. Flicker.  Dementia Reconsidered: the Person Comes First , 1999, BMJ.

[10]  The Žižek reader , 1999 .

[11]  B. Winblad,et al.  Influence of social network on occurrence of dementia: a community-based longitudinal study , 2000, The Lancet.

[12]  I. Vernersson.  Open University Press , 2000 .

[13]  Herman T. Tavani,et al.  Privacy protection, control of information, and privacy-enhancing technologies , 2001, CSOC.

[14]  P. H. Kahn,et al.  Human values, ethics, and design , 2002 .

[15]  Joelle Pineau,et al.  Pearl: A Mobile Robotic Assistant for the Elderly , 2002 .

[16]  Laura Fratiglioni,et al.  Late-life engagement in social and leisure activities is associated with a decreased risk of dementia: a longitudinal study from the Kungsholmen project. , 2002, American journal of epidemiology.

[17]  M. Kanamori,et al.  [Maintenance and improvement of quality of life among elderly patients using a pet-type robot]. , 2002, Nihon Ronen Igakkai zasshi. Japanese journal of geriatrics.

[18]  雅夫 金森,et al.  ペット型ロボットによる高齢者の Quality of Life 維持・向上の試み , 2002 .

[19]  William A Banks,et al.  The effects of animal-assisted therapy on loneliness in an elderly population in long-term care facilities. , 2002, The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences.

[20]  C. Kirschbaum,et al.  Social support and oxytocin interact to suppress cortisol and subjective responses to psychosocial stress , 2003, Biological Psychiatry.

[21]  Jacqui Smith.  Stress and aging: theoretical and empirical challenges for interdisciplinary research , 2003, Neurobiology of Aging.

[22]  J. Preece,et al.  The Human-Computer Interaction Handbook , 2003 .

[23]  J. Forlizzi,et al.  Assistive robotics and an ecology of elders living independently in their homes , 2004 .

[24]  R. Sparrow.  The March of the robot dogs , 2002, Ethics and Information Technology.

[25]  Batya Friedman,et al.  Robotic pets in the lives of preschool children , 2004, CHI EA '04.

[26]  T. Tamura,et al.  Is an entertainment robot useful in the care of elderly people with severe dementia? , 2004, The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences.

[27]  George W Rebok,et al.  Social network characteristics and cognition in middle-aged and older adults. , 2004, The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences.

[28]  Jodi Forlizzi,et al.  Assistive Robotics and an Ecology of Elders Living Independently in Their Homes , 2004, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[29]  W. Banks,et al.  The effects of group and individual animal-assisted therapy on loneliness in residents of long-term care facilities , 2005 .

[30]  Batya Friedman,et al.  Robots as dogs?: children's interactions with the robotic dog AIBO and a live australian shepherd , 2005, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[31]  Harry Cayton,et al.  From childhood to childhood? Autonomy and dependence through the ages of life , 2005 .

[32]  Lee Humphreys,et al.  Digital Media: Transformations in Human Communication , 2006 .

[33]  Lenore J Launer,et al.  The effect of social engagement on incident dementia: the Honolulu-Asia Aging Study. , 2006, American journal of epidemiology.

[34]  Cory D. Kidd,et al.  Relational artifacts with children and elders: the complexities of cybercompanionship , 2006, Connect. Sci..

[35]  Wendell Wallach,et al.  Why Machine Ethics? , 2006, IEEE Intelligent Systems.

[36]  Takanori Shibata,et al.  Robot Therapy in a Care House , 2006 .

[37]  Robert Sparrow,et al.  In the hands of machines? The future of aged care , 2006, Minds and Machines.

[38]  Michael Anderson,et al.  An Approach to Computing Ethics , 2006, IEEE Intelligent Systems.

[39]  J. Winslow,et al.  Social buffering: relief from stress and anxiety , 2006, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[40]  Takanori Shibata,et al.  Robot therapy in a care house - its sociopsychological and physiological effects on the residents , 2006, Proceedings 2006 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2006. ICRA 2006..

[41]  J. Hughes,et al.  Dementia: Mind, Meaning, and the Person , 2006 .

[43]  J. Schneider,et al.  Loneliness and risk of Alzheimer disease. , 2007, Archives of general psychiatry.

[44]  Noel E. Sharkey,et al.  Artificial intelligence and natural magic , 2006, Artificial Intelligence Review.

[45]  Noel Sharkey,et al.  The Ethical Frontiers of Robotics , 2008, Science.

[46]  W. Banks,et al.  Animal-assisted therapy and loneliness in nursing homes: use of robotic versus living dogs. , 2008, Journal of the American Medical Directors Association.

[47]  Nicholas Roy,et al.  Spoken language interaction with model uncertainty: an adaptive human–robot interaction system , 2008, Connect. Sci..

[48]  Allen R. Hanson,et al.  Mobile manipulators for assisted living in residential settings , 2008, Auton. Robots.

[49]  C. Allen,et al.  Moral Machines: Teaching Robots Right from Wrong , 2008 .

[50]  H. Nguyen.  El-E: An Assistive Robot that Fetches Objects from Flat Surfaces , 2008 .

[51]  Shuk Ying Ho,et al.  Human-computer interaction and management information systems: Foundations , 2008, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[52]  Noel E. Sharkey,et al.  The Robot Arm of the Law Grows Longer , 2009, Computer.

[53]  Sonia Chernova,et al.  Mobile human-robot teaming with environmental tolerance , 2009, 2009 4th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[54]  Markus Heinrichs,et al.  Oxytocin, vasopressin, and human social behavior , 2009, Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology.

[55]  L. Takayama.  On Making Robots Invisible-in-Use , 2010 .

[56]  Noel E. Sharkey,et al.  Living with robots: Ethical tradeoffs in eldercare , 2010 .

[57]  N. Sharkey,et al.  The crying shame of robot nannies: An ethical appraisal , 2010 .

[58]  P. Gray,et al.  Oxytocin, Vasopressin, and Human Social Behavior , 2012, Endocrinology of Social Relationships.

[59]  Colin Allen,et al.  E TH E L : Toward a Principled Ethical Eldercare Robot , 2022 .