Lack of research-based standards for accessible housing: problematization and exemplification of consequences

ObjectiveTo increase the understanding of how definitions of standards for housing design influence the proportion of dwellings not meeting the standards and the proportion of individuals defined as having accessibility problems.MethodsThe sample included old people and their dwellings in three European countries (N = 1,150). Frequencies and percentages were reported and empirical distribution functions were used.ResultsDepending on the functional profile and standards in question, the magnitude of influence of the standards differs in extent, e.g., the existing standard for door openings at the entrance (defined ≥75 cm) implied that the proportion of dwellings not meeting it was 11.3% compared to 64.4%, if the standard was set to ≥83 cm. The proportion of individuals defined as having accessibility problems for profiles not using mobility devices was 4–5, 57% for profiles using them and 1–3% for the total sample if the standard was set to 90 cm.ConclusionResearch-based standard definitions for housing design are necessary to ensure that they actually lead to enhanced accessibility, which is a prerequisite for the independence and health of persons with functional limitations.

[1]  Susanne Iwarsson,et al.  Relationships between objective and perceived housing in very old age. , 2007, The Gerontologist.

[2]  Vision, out-of-home activities, and emotional well-being in old age: Do macro-contexts make a difference? , 2005 .

[3]  S. Iwarsson,et al.  The multiple meaning of home as experienced by very old Swedish people , 2007, Scandinavian journal of occupational therapy.

[4]  M. Laplante,et al.  MOBILITY DEVICE USE IN THE UNITED STATES: DISABILITY STATISTICS REPORT , 2000 .

[5]  Marcus Ormerod,et al.  Accessible housing: quality, disability and design , 2008 .

[6]  Göran Ejlertsson,et al.  Folkhälsa som tvärvetenskap : möten mellan ämnen , 2009 .

[7]  David Feathers,et al.  Anthropometry and Standards for Wheeled Mobility: An International Comparison , 2010, Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA.

[8]  Pj Clarkson,et al.  Combining utility, usability and accessibility methods foruniversal access , 2001 .

[9]  Negotiating difference: disabled people's experiences of housebuilders , 2004 .

[10]  David Feathers,et al.  An anthropometric study of manual and powered wheelchair users , 2004 .

[11]  Ann A. Wilcock,et al.  An Occupational Perspective of Health , 2000 .

[12]  S. Iwarsson,et al.  Home as the Locus and Origin for Participation: Experiences among Very Old Swedish People , 2007 .

[13]  David Feathers,et al.  Space Requirements for Wheeled Mobility Devices , 2004 .

[14]  Susanne Iwarsson,et al.  Defining Profiles of Functional Limitations in Groups of Older Persons: How and Why? , 2011, Journal of aging and health.

[15]  S. Iwarsson,et al.  Accessibility, usability and universal design—positioning and definition of concepts describing person-environment relationships , 2003, Disability and rehabilitation.

[16]  Tina Helle,et al.  The Nordic Housing Enabler: Inter-rater reliability in cross-Nordic occupational therapy practice , 2010, Scandinavian journal of occupational therapy.

[17]  D. Crews,et al.  Aging, disability, and frailty: implications for universal design. , 2006, Journal of physiological anthropology.

[18]  S. Iwarsson,et al.  The ENABLE-AGE Project: Multi-dimensional methodology for European housing research , 2005 .

[19]  Susanne Iwarsson,et al.  Challenges of cross-national housing research with older persons: lessons from the ENABLE-AGE project , 2004, European journal of ageing.

[20]  Susanne Iwarsson,et al.  Cross-national and multi-professional inter-rater reliability of the Housing Enabler , 2005, Scandinavian journal of occupational therapy.

[21]  Susanne Iwarsson,et al.  Relationships between housing and healthy aging in very old age. , 2007, The Gerontologist.

[22]  M. Powell Lawton,et al.  Ecology and the aging process. , 1973 .

[23]  Glenys French.  Using environments to enable occupational performance , 2005 .

[24]  M. Powell Lawton,et al.  The psychology of adult development and aging , 1973 .

[25]  G. Whiteford.  Occupational Deprivation: Global Challenge in the New Millennium , 2000 .

[26]  B Das,et al.  Structural anthropometric measurements for wheelchair mobile adults. , 1999, Applied ergonomics.

[27]  John W. Kozey,et al.  Determination of the normal and maximum reach measures of adult wheelchair users , 2004 .

[28]  C. Christiansen,et al.  Introduction to Occupation: The Art and Science of Living: New Multidisciplinary Perspectives for Understanding Human Occupation as a Central Feature of Individual Experience and Social Organization , 2003 .

[29]  Susanne Iwarsson,et al.  The Housing Enabler. An Instrument for Assessing and Analysing Accessibility Problems in Housing. , 2001 .