Global Convergence in the Temperature Sensitivity of Respiration at Ecosystem Level

Carbon Cycle and Climate Change As climate change accelerates, it is important to know the likely impact of climate change on the carbon cycle (see the Perspective by Reich). Gross primary production (GPP) is a measure of the amount of CO2 removed from the atmosphere every year to fuel photosynthesis. Beer et al. (p. 834, published online 5 July) used a combination of observation and calculation to estimate that the total GPP by terrestrial plants is around 122 billion tons per year; in comparison, burning fossil fuels emits about 7 billion tons annually. Thirty-two percent of this uptake occurs in tropical forests, and precipitation controls carbon uptake in more than 40% of vegetated land. The temperature sensitivity (Q10) of ecosystem respiratory processes is a key determinant of the interaction between climate and the carbon cycle. Mahecha et al. (p. 838, published online 5 July) now show that the Q10 of ecosystem respiration is invariant with respect to mean annual temperature, independent of the analyzed ecosystem type, with a global mean value for Q10 of 1.6. This level of temperature sensitivity suggests a less-pronounced climate sensitivity of the carbon cycle than assumed by recent climate models. The long-standing discrepancy between modeled and empirical measures of ecosystem temperature sensitivity is resolved. The respiratory release of carbon dioxide (CO2) from the land surface is a major flux in the global carbon cycle, antipodal to photosynthetic CO2 uptake. Understanding the sensitivity of respiratory processes to temperature is central for quantifying the climate–carbon cycle feedback. We approximated the sensitivity of terrestrial ecosystem respiration to air temperature (Q10) across 60 FLUXNET sites with the use of a methodology that circumvents confounding effects. Contrary to previous findings, our results suggest that Q10 is independent of mean annual temperature, does not differ among biomes, and is confined to values around 1.4 ± 0.1. The strong relation between photosynthesis and respiration, by contrast, is highly variable among sites. The results may partly explain a less pronounced climate–carbon cycle feedback than suggested by current carbon cycle climate models.

[1]  D. Hillel.  Introduction to environmental soil physics , 1982 .

[2]  J. Lloyd,et al.  On the temperature dependence of soil respiration , 1994 .

[3]  Wolfgang Knorr,et al.  Impact of drought stress and other factors on seasonal land biosphere CO2 exchange studied through an atmospheric tracer transport model , 1995 .

[4]  M. Kirschbaum,et al.  The temperature dependence of soil organic matter decomposition, and the effect of global warming on soil organic C storage , 1995 .

[5]  M. Reichstein,et al.  Temperature dependence of organic matter decomposition: a critical review using literature data analyzed with different models , 1998, Biology and Fertility of Soils.

[6]  J. Amthor.  The McCree-de Wit-Penning de Vries-Thornley Respiration Paradigms: 30 Years Later , 2000 .

[7]  Harold A. Mooney,et al.  Terrestrial Global Productivity , 2001 .

[8]  Yiqi Luo,et al.  Acclimatization of soil respiration to warming in a tall grass prairie , 2001, Nature.

[9]  Peter E. Thornton,et al.  Modeling and measuring the effects of disturbance history and climate on carbon and water budgets in evergreen needleleaf forests , 2002 .

[10]  M. Noguer,et al.  Climate change 2001: The scientific basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change , 2002 .

[11]  Timothy M. Lenton,et al.  Global terrestrial carbon storage and uncertainties in its temperature sensitivity examined with a simple model , 2003 .

[12]  P. Cox,et al.  Uncertainty in climate’carbon-cycle projections associated with the sensitivity of soil respiration to temperature , 2003 .

[13]  I. C. Prentice,et al.  Evaluation of ecosystem dynamics, plant geography and terrestrial carbon cycling in the LPJ dynamic global vegetation model , 2003 .

[14]  Ecmwf Newsletter,et al.  EUROPEAN CENTRE FOR MEDIUM-RANGE WEATHER FORECASTS , 2004 .

[15]  David J. Smith,et al.  Is photoinhibition of zooxanthellae photosynthesis the primary cause of thermal bleaching in corals? , 2005 .

[16]  I. C. Prentice,et al.  A dynamic global vegetation model for studies of the coupled atmosphere‐biosphere system , 2005 .

[17]  Pete Smith,et al.  Similar response of labile and resistant soil organic matter pools to changes in temperature , 2005, Nature.

[18]  Michael J. Rogers,et al.  Long-term sensitivity of soil carbon turnover to warming , 2005, Nature.

[19]  R. Schnur,et al.  Climate-carbon cycle feedback analysis: Results from the C , 2006 .

[20]  J. Tenhunen,et al.  Does the temperature sensitivity of decomposition of soil organic matter depend upon water content, soil horizon, or incubation time? , 2005 .

[21]  T. Vesala,et al.  On the separation of net ecosystem exchange into assimilation and ecosystem respiration: review and improved algorithm , 2005 .

[22]  A. Heinemeyer,et al.  Respiration of the external mycelium in the arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis shows strong dependence on recent photosynthates and acclimation to temperature. , 2006, The New phytologist.

[23]  E. Davidson,et al.  On the variability of respiration in terrestrial ecosystems: moving beyond Q10 , 2006 .

[24]  E. Davidson,et al.  Temperature sensitivity of soil carbon decomposition and feedbacks to climate change , 2006, Nature.

[25]  G. Ågren,et al.  What determines the temperature response of soil organic matter decomposition , 2007 .

[26]  S. Solomon.  The Physical Science Basis : Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change , 2007 .

[27]  D. A. Sampson,et al.  Basal rates of soil respiration are correlated with photosynthesis in a mixed temperate forest , 2007 .

[28]  Markus Reichstein,et al.  Soil respiration across scales: The importance of a model–data integration framework for data interpretation† , 2008 .

[29]  M. Heimann,et al.  Terrestrial ecosystem carbon dynamics and climate feedbacks , 2008, Nature.

[30]  W. Kutsch,et al.  Soil respiration fluxes in relation to photosynthetic activity in broad-leaf and needle-leaf forest stands , 2008 .

[31]  D. Baldocchi.  ‘Breathing’ of the terrestrial biosphere: lessons learned from a global network of carbon dioxide flux measurement systems , 2008 .

[32]  L. Gu,et al.  A novel approach for identifying the true temperature sensitivity from soil respiration measurements , 2008 .

[33]  Peter E. Thornton,et al.  Systematic assessment of terrestrial biogeochemistry in coupled climate–carbon models , 2009 .

[34]  Shilong Piao,et al.  Temperature sensitivity of soil respiration in different ecosystems in China , 2009 .

[35]  Yakov Kuzyakov,et al.  REVIEW: Time lag between photosynthesis and carbon dioxide efflux from soil: a review of mechanisms and controls , 2010 .

[36]  Ben Bond-Lamberty,et al.  Temperature-associated increases in the global soil respiration record , 2010, Nature.

[37]  Pete Smith,et al.  Soil respiration across scales: towards an integration of patterns and processes. , 2010, The New phytologist.

[38]  Valerie Trouet,et al.  Ensemble reconstruction constraints on the global carbon cycle sensitivity to climate , 2010, Nature.

[39]  M. Kirschbaum.  The temperature dependence of organic matter decomposition: seasonal temperature variations turn a sharp short‐term temperature response into a more moderate annually averaged response , 2010 .

[40]  A. Arneth,et al.  Separation of net ecosystem exchange into assimilation and respiration using a light response curve approach: critical issues and global evaluation , 2010 .

[41]  S. Seneviratne,et al.  Response to Comment on “Global Convergence in the Temperature Sensitivity of Respiration at Ecosystem Level” , 2011, Science.

[42]  Nuno Carvalhais,et al.  Semiempirical modeling of abiotic and biotic factors controlling ecosystem respiration across eddy covariance sites , 2011 .