Informing assistive robots with models of contact forces from able-bodied face wiping and shaving

Hygiene and feeding are activities of daily living (ADLs) that often involve contact with a person's face. Robots can assist people with motor impairments to perform these tasks by holding a tool that makes contact with the care receiver's face. By sensing the forces applied to the face with the tool, robots could potentially provide assistance that is more comfortable, safe, and effective. In order to inform the design of robotic controllers and assistive robots, we investigated the forces able-bodied people apply to themselves when wiping and shaving their faces. We present our methods for capturing and modeling these forces, results from a study with 9 participants, and recommendations for assistive robots. Our contributions include a trapezoidal force model that assumes participants have a target force they attempt to achieve for each stroke of the tool. We discuss advantages of this 3 parameter model and show that it fits our data well relative to other candidate models. We also provide statistics of the models' rise rates, fall rates, and target forces for the 9 participants in our study. In addition, we illustrate how the target forces varied based on the task, participant, and location on the face.

[1]  John Fox,et al.  What Is Nonparametric Regression , 2000 .

[2]  Walter Herzog,et al.  Model-based estimation of muscle forces exerted during movements. , 2007, Clinical biomechanics.

[3]  Alin Albu-Schäffer,et al.  Soft-tissue injury in robotics , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[4]  M. Timmerman,et al.  Relationship between the plaque removal efficacy of a manual toothbrush and brushing force. , 1998, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[5]  Blake Hannaford,et al.  Haptic characteristics of some activities of daily living , 2010, 2010 IEEE Haptics Symposium.

[6]  Alin Albu-Schäffer,et al.  Safety Analysis for a Human-Friendly Manipulator , 2010, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[7]  Alexander Zelinsky,et al.  Quantitative Safety Guarantees for Physical Human-Robot Interaction , 2003, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[8]  Advait Jain,et al.  Improving robot manipulation with data-driven object-centric models of everyday forces , 2013, Auton. Robots.

[9]  Heather Janiszewski Goodin,et al.  The nursing shortage in the United States of America: an integrative review of the literature. , 2003, Journal of advanced nursing.

[10]  Timo Malm,et al.  Safety of Interactive Robotics—Learning from Accidents , 2010, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[11]  Koji Ikuta,et al.  Safety Evaluation Method of Design and Control for Human-Care Robots , 2003, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[12]  M Greig,et al.  Characterizing human hand prehensile strength by force and moment wrench , 2001, Ergonomics.

[13]  Advait Jain,et al.  The complex structure of simple devices: A survey of trajectories and forces that open doors and drawers , 2010, 2010 3rd IEEE RAS & EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics.

[14]  B. Hannaford,et al.  Surgeon/Endoscopic Tool Force-Torque Signatures In The Evaluation of Surgical Skills During Minimall , 1999 .

[15]  Christopher J. Harper,et al.  Towards the Development of International Safety Standards for Human Robot Interaction , 2010, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[16]  Alois Knoll,et al.  Design Principles for Safety in Human-Robot Interaction , 2010, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[17]  J. Wiener,et al.  Measuring the activities of daily living: comparisons across national surveys. , 1990, Journal of gerontology.

[18]  Yoji Yamada,et al.  Human-robot contact in the safeguarding space , 1997 .