Examining the role of self-regulated learning on introductory programming performance

The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between self-regulated learning (SRL) and introductory programming performance. Participants were undergraduate students enrolled in an introductory computer programming module at a third-level (post-high school) institution. The instrument used in this study was designed to assess the motivations and learning strategies (cognitive, metacognitive and resource management strategies) of college students. The data gathered was analyzed to determine if a relationship existed between self-regulation and programming performance and investigate if SRL could be used to predict performance on the module. The study found that students who perform well in programming use more metacognitive and resource management strategies than lower performing students. In addition, students who have high levels of intrinsic motivation and task value perform better in programming and use more metacognitive and resource management strategies than students with low levels of intrinsic motivation and task value. Finally, a regression model based on cognitive, metacognitive and resource management strategies was able to account for 45% of the variance in programming performance results.

[1]  P. Pintrich.  The dynamic interplay of student motivation and cognition in the college classroom , 1989 .

[2]  Brenda Cantwell Wilson,et al.  Contributing to success in an introductory computer science course: a study of twelve factors , 2001, SIGCSE '01.

[3]  P. Pintrich.  The role of motivation in promoting and sustaining self-regulated learning , 1999 .

[4]  Ronan G. Reilly,et al.  The Influence of Motivation and Comfort-Level on Learning to Program , 2005, PPIG.

[5]  B. Zimmerman.  Becoming a Self-Regulated Learner: Which Are the Key Subprocesses?. , 1986 .

[6]  Janet Rountree,et al.  Predictors of success and failure in a CS1 course , 2002, SGCS.

[7]  B. Zimmerman,et al.  Student Differences in Self-Regulated Learning: Relating Grade, Sex, and Giftedness to Self-Efficacy and Strategy Use. , 1990 .

[8]  Paul R. Pintrich,et al.  The differential impact of extrinsic and mastery goal orientations on males' and females' self-regulated learning. , 1999 .

[9]  Pajares,et al.  Relation between Achievement Goals and Self-Beliefs of Middle School Students in Writing and Science. , 2000, Contemporary educational psychology.

[10]  Phyllis C. Blumenfeld,et al.  Predicting Achievement Early and Late in the Semester: The Role of Motivation and Use of Learning Strategies. , 1990 .

[11]  Ronan G. Reilly,et al.  Programming: factors that influence success , 2005, SIGCSE '05.

[12]  P. Pintrich.  A Manual for the Use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). , 1991 .

[13]  George P. McCabe,et al.  Predicting the success of freshmen in a computer science major , 1984, CACM.

[14]  P. Pintrich,et al.  Students' motivational beliefs and their cognitive engagement in classroom academic tasks. , 1992 .

[15]  P. Pintrich,et al.  Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. , 1990 .