Global difficulty modulates the prioritization strategy in multitasking situations.

There has been a considerable amount of research to conceptualize how cognition handle multitasking situations. Despite these efforts, it is still not clear how task parameters shape attentionnal resources allocation. For instance, many research have suggested that difficulty levels could explain these conflicting observations and very few have considered other factors such as task importance. In the present study, twenty participants had to carry out two N-Back tasks simultaneously, each subtask having distinct difficulty (0,1 or 2-Back) and importance (1 or 3 points) levels. Participants's cumulative dwell time were collected to assess their attentional strategies. Results showed that depending on the global level of difficulty (combination of the two levels of difficulty), attentional resources of people were driven either by the subtask difficulty (under low-global-difficulty) or the subtask importance (under high-global-difficulty), in a non-compensatory way. We discussed these results in terms of decision-making heuristics and metacognition.

[1]  Ken Funk,et al.  Cockpit Task Management: Preliminary Definitions, Normative Theory, Error Taxonomy, and Design Recommendations , 1991 .

[2]  J. Findlay,et al.  The Relationship between Eye Movements and Spatial Attention , 1986, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[3]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  Attention to Action , 1986 .

[4]  D Gopher,et al.  Different difficulty manipulations interact differently with task emphasis: evidence for multiple resources. , 1982, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[5]  Daniel Gopher,et al.  Switching tasks and attention policies. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[6]  Rakefet Ackerman,et al.  The diminishing criterion model for metacognitive regulation of time investment. , 2014, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[7]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  Strategic workload management and decision biases in aviation , 1994 .

[8]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  Time Sharing Between Robotics and Process Control , 2016, Hum. Factors.

[9]  Angela L. Duckworth,et al.  An opportunity cost model of subjective effort and task performance. , 2013, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[10]  Richard B. Ivry,et al.  Task switching and multitask performance. , 2000 .

[11]  G. Robert J. Hockey,et al.  Performance in a Complex Multiple-Task Environment during a Laboratory-Based Simulation of Occasional Night Work , 2003, Hum. Factors.

[12]  Daniel G Bobrow,et al.  On data-limited and resource-limited processes , 1975, Cognitive Psychology.

[13]  T. O. Nelson.  Metamemory: A Theoretical Framework and New Findings , 1990 .

[14]  Michael Freed,et al.  Managing Multiple Tasks in Complex, Dynamic Environments , 1998, AAAI/IAAI.

[15]  Catherine M Arrington,et al.  Voluntary task switching: chasing the elusive homunculus. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[16]  J. Hoffman,et al.  The role of visual attention in saccadic eye movements , 1995, Perception & psychophysics.

[17]  S. Huettel,et al.  The functional neuroanatomy of decision making: Prefrontal control of thought and action , 2012, Brain Research.

[18]  Dario D. Salvucci,et al.  Threaded cognition: an integrated theory of concurrent multitasking. , 2008, Psychological review.

[19]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  Factors Affecting Task Management in Aviation , 2007, Hum. Factors.

[20]  Jennifer Rae Wilson,et al.  THE EFFECT OF AUTOMATION ON THE FREQUENCY OF TASK PRIORITIZATION ERRORS ON COMMERCIAL AIRCRAFT FLIGHT DECKS: AN ASRS INCIDENT REPORT STUDY , 1998 .

[21]  Duncan P. Brumby,et al.  Strategic Adaptation to Task Characteristics, Incentives, and Individual Differences in Dual-Tasking , 2015, PloS one.

[22]  T. Shallice,et al.  The cognitive and neuroanatomical correlates of multitasking , 2000, Neuropsychologia.

[23]  Jennifer M. Glass,et al.  Virtually Perfect Time Sharing in Dual-Task Performance: Uncorking the Central Cognitive Bottleneck , 2001, Psychological science.

[24]  H. Pashler.  Dual-task interference in simple tasks: data and theory. , 1994, Psychological bulletin.

[25]  Joseph T. McGuire,et al.  Decision making and the avoidance of cognitive demand. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[26]  L. Chelazzi,et al.  Altering Spatial Priority Maps via Reward-Based Learning , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[27]  P. Calabresi,et al.  Saccade preparation inhibits reorienting to recently attended locations. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[28]  Daniel Gopher,et al.  On the Economy of the Human Processing System: A Model of Multiple Capacity. , 1977 .

[29]  Andrew Howes,et al.  Focus on driving: how cognitive constraints shape the adaptation of strategy when dialing while driving , 2009, CHI.

[30]  Robert W Proctor,et al.  Allocation of effort as a function of payoffs for individual tasks in a multitasking environment , 2009, Behavior research methods.

[31]  Rakefet Ackerman,et al.  The effects of goal-driven and data-driven regulation on metacognitive monitoring during learning: a developmental perspective. , 2014, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[32]  Daniel G. Morrow,et al.  Expertise, Cognitive Ability, and Age Effects on Pilot Communication , 2003 .

[33]  Nadine B. Sarter,et al.  Not Now! Supporting Interruption Management by Indicating the Modality and Urgency of Pending Tasks , 2004, Hum. Factors.

[34]  Thibault Gateau,et al.  In silico vs. Over the Clouds: On-the-Fly Mental State Estimation of Aircraft Pilots, Using a Functional Near Infrared Spectroscopy Based Passive-BCI , 2018, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[35]  A. Baddeley.  Working memory: theories, models, and controversies. , 2012, Annual review of psychology.

[36]  Harold Pashler,et al.  Task prioritisation in multitasking during driving: opportunity to abort a concurrent task does not insulate braking responses from dual‐task slowing , 2008 .

[37]  Wendell R. Ricks,et al.  Cognitive models of pilot categorization and prioritization of flight-deck information , 1995 .

[38]  Gerd Gigerenzer,et al.  Heuristic decision making. , 2011, Annual review of psychology.

[39]  Ruth O'Hara,et al.  Cognitive ability, expertise, and age differences in following air-traffic control instructions. , 2005, Psychology and aging.

[40]  S. Zeki,et al.  The neurology of saccades and covert shifts in spatial attention: an event-related fMRI study. , 2000, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[41]  D. Gitelman,et al.  Covert Visual Spatial Orienting and Saccades: Overlapping Neural Systems , 2000, NeuroImage.

[42]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Attention and Effort , 1973 .

[43]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  The origin of bursts and heavy tails in human dynamics , 2005, Nature.

[44]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  Discrete task switching in overload: A meta-analyses and a model , 2015, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[45]  Shayne Loft,et al.  Modeling and Predicting Mental Workload in En Route Air Traffic Control: Critical Review and Broader Implications , 2007, Hum. Factors.

[46]  Stephanie M. Doane,et al.  Memory Processes of Flight Situation Awareness: Interactive Roles of Working Memory Capacity, Long-Term Working Memory, and Expertise , 2004, Hum. Factors.

[47]  D E Kieras,et al.  A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: Part 1. Basic mechanisms. , 1997, Psychological review.

[48]  Niels Taatgen,et al.  Integrated Models of Cognitive Systems , 2008 .

[49]  C. Eriksen,et al.  The flankers task and response competition: A useful tool for investigating a variety of cognitive problems , 1995 .

[50]  Kurt Colvin,et al.  Task Prioritization Factors: Two Part-Task Simulator Studies , 2005 .

[51]  Eric Raufaste,et al.  Differences in Multitask Resource Reallocation After Change in Task Values , 2016, Hum. Factors.

[52]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Effects of spatial attention on directional manual and ocular responses , 1997, Experimental Brain Research.

[53]  J. C. Sperandio,et al.  Variation of Operator's Strategies and Regulating Effects on Workload , 1971 .

[54]  Jennifer M. Glass,et al.  Concurrent response-selection processes in dual-task performance: Evidence for adaptive executive control of task scheduling. , 1999 .

[55]  L. Enochsson,et al.  Visual working memory influences the performance in virtual image–guided surgical intervention , 2007, Surgical Endoscopy.

[56]  R. Hertwig,et al.  The priority heuristic: making choices without trade-offs. , 2006, Psychological review.

[57]  D. E. Irwin,et al.  Covert shifts of attention precede involuntary eye movements , 2004 .

[58]  Daniel Gopher,et al.  How is performance limited: Testing the notion of central capacity , 1980 .

[59]  B. Anderson.  A value-driven mechanism of attentional selection. , 2013, Journal of vision.

[60]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  Multiple resources and performance prediction , 2002 .

[61]  Eric J. Johnson,et al.  The adaptive decision maker , 1993 .

[62]  Jonathan Westley Peirce,et al.  Neuroinformatics Original Research Article Generating Stimuli for Neuroscience Using Psychopy , 2022 .