Probing for Intentions: Why Clocks Do Not Provide the Only Measurement of Time

Having an intention to act is commonly operationalized as the moment at which awareness of an urge or decision to act arises. Measuring this moment has been challenging due to the dependence on first-person reports of subjective experience rather than objective behavioral or neural measurements. Commonly, this challenge is met using (variants of) Libet's clock method. In 2008, Matsuhashi and Hallett published a novel probing strategy as an alternative to the clock method. We believe their probe method could provide a valuable addition to the clock method because: it measures the timing of an intention in real-time, it can be combined with additional (tactile, visual or auditory) stimuli to create a more ecologically valid experimental context, and it allows the measurement of the point of no return. Yet to this date, the probe method has not been applied widely - possibly due to concerns about the effects that the probes might have on the intention and/or action preparation processes. To address these concerns, a 2 × 2 within-subject design is tested. In this design, two variables are manipulated: (1) the requirement of an introspection report and (2) the presence of an auditory probe. Three observables are measured that provide information about the timing of an intention to act: (1) awareness reports of the subjective experience of having an intention, (2) neural preparatory activity for action, and (3) behavioral data of the performed actions. The presence of probes was found to speed up mean action times by roughly 300 ms, but did not alter the neural preparation for action. The requirement of an introspection report did influence brain signals: reducing the amplitude of the readiness potential and increasing the desynchronization in the alpha and beta bands over the motor cortex prior to action onset. By discussing the strengths and weaknesses of the probe method compared to the clock method, we hope to demonstrate its added value and promote its use in future research.

[1]  Patrick Haggard,et al.  The Neurocognitive Bases of Human Volition. , 2018, Annual review of psychology.

[2]  J. Šmahaj,et al.  Libet’s experiment: A complex replication , 2018, Consciousness and Cognition.

[3]  Veljko Dubljević,et al.  The Impact of a Landmark Neuroscience Study on Free Will: A Qualitative Analysis of Articles Using Libet and Colleagues' Methods , 2018 .

[4]  Patrick Haggard,et al.  Precursor processes of human self-initiated action , 2017, NeuroImage.

[5]  R. Verleger,et al.  Time to Move Again: Does the Bereitschaftspotential Covary with Demands on Internal Timing? , 2016, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[6]  John-Dylan Haynes,et al.  Similar coding of freely chosen and externally cued intentions in a fronto-parietal network , 2016, NeuroImage.

[7]  J. Farquhar,et al.  Detecting traces of consciousness in the process of intending to act , 2016, Experimental Brain Research.

[8]  Thalia Wheatley,et al.  Readiness potentials driven by non-motoric processes , 2016, Consciousness and Cognition.

[9]  Benjamin Blankertz,et al.  The point of no return in vetoing self-initiated movements , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[10]  Pim Haselager,et al.  A Reason To Be Free , 2015 .

[11]  T. Mima,et al.  Parkinson's disease patients showed delayed awareness of motor intention , 2015, Neuroscience Research.

[12]  Mark Hallett,et al.  Modulating Conscious Movement Intention by Noninvasive Brain Stimulation and the Underlying Neural Mechanisms , 2015, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[13]  P. Nachev,et al.  The neural antecedents to voluntary action: A conceptual analysis , 2014, Cognitive neuroscience.

[14]  J. Rowe,et al.  Beyond the “urge to move”: objective measures for the study of agency in the post-Libet era , 2014, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[15]  T. Hinterberger,et al.  First-person approaches in neuroscience of consciousness: Brain dynamics correlate with the intention to act , 2014, Consciousness and Cognition.

[16]  Pim Haselager,et al.  Why we may not find intentions in the brain , 2014, Neuropsychologia.

[17]  D. Navon How plausible is it that conscious control is illusory? , 2014, The American journal of psychology.

[18]  Mark Hallett,et al.  What We Think before a Voluntary Movement , 2013, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[19]  Alexander A. Schlegel,et al.  Barking up the wrong free: readiness potentials reflect processes independent of conscious will , 2013, Experimental Brain Research.

[20]  J. Haynes,et al.  Predicting free choices for abstract intentions , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[21]  P. Tse Barking Up the Wrong Free: Readiness Potentials and the Role of Conscious Willing , 2013 .

[22]  Stanislas Dehaene,et al.  An accumulator model for spontaneous neural activity prior to self-initiated movement , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[23]  R. Turner,et al.  Tracking the Unconscious Generation of Free Decisions Using UItra-High Field fMRI , 2011, PloS one.

[24]  M. Brass,et al.  Inducing Disbelief in Free Will Alters Brain Correlates of Preconscious Motor Preparation , 2011, Psychological science.

[25]  G. Kreiman,et al.  Internally Generated Preactivation of Single Neurons in Human Medial Frontal Cortex Predicts Volition , 2011, Neuron.

[26]  M. Hallett,et al.  Prediction of human voluntary movement before it occurs , 2011, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[27]  Jeff Miller,et al.  Effects of Clock Monitoring on Electroencephalographic Activity , 2011, Psychological science.

[28]  A. Mele Testing Free Will , 2010 .

[29]  W. Banks,et al.  We Infer Rather Than Perceive the Moment We Decided to Act , 2009, Psychological science.

[30]  M. Hallett,et al.  The timing of the conscious intention to move , 2008, The European journal of neuroscience.

[31]  P. Haggard Human volition: towards a neuroscience of will , 2008, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[32]  M. Brass,et al.  Unconscious determinants of free decisions in the human brain , 2008, Nature Neuroscience.

[33]  R. Oostenveld,et al.  Nonparametric statistical testing of EEG- and MEG-data , 2007, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[34]  Hakwan C. Lau,et al.  Manipulating the Experienced Onset of Intention after Action Execution , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[35]  M. Hallett,et al.  What is the Bereitschaftspotential? , 2006, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[36]  P. Brown,et al.  Lateralization of event-related beta desynchronization in the EEG during pre-cued reaction time tasks , 2005, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[37]  H. Kornhuber,et al.  Hirnpotentialänderungen bei Willkürbewegungen und passiven Bewegungen des Menschen: Bereitschaftspotential und reafferente Potentiale , 1965, Pflüger's Archiv für die gesamte Physiologie des Menschen und der Tiere.

[38]  P. Haggard,et al.  Altered awareness of voluntary action after damage to the parietal cortex , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[39]  W. Prinz,et al.  The Perceived Onset Time of Self- and Other-Generated Actions , 2003, Psychological science.

[40]  P. Haggard,et al.  Voluntary action and conscious awareness , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[41]  P. Haggard,et al.  On the relation between brain potentials and the awareness of voluntary movements , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[42]  G. Gratton Dealing with artifacts: The EOG contamination of the event-related brain potential , 1998 .

[43]  H. Heckhausen,et al.  Readiness potentials preceding spontaneous motor acts: voluntary vs. involuntary control. , 1990, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[44]  F. Perrin,et al.  Spherical splines for scalp potential and current density mapping. , 1989, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[45]  B. Libet,et al.  Time of conscious intention to act in relation to onset of cerebral activity (readiness-potential). The unconscious initiation of a freely voluntary act. , 1983, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[46]  G. Pfurtscheller,et al.  Evaluation of event-related desynchronization (ERD) preceding and following voluntary self-paced movement. , 1979, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[47]  F. Wilcoxon Individual Comparisons by Ranking Methods , 1945 .