CondiDiag1.0: a flexible online diagnostic tool for conditional sampling and budget analysis in the E3SM atmosphere model (EAM)

Abstract. Numerical models used in weather and climate prediction take into account a comprehensive set of atmospheric processes (i.e., phenomena) such as the resolved and unresolved fluid dynamics, radiative transfer, cloud and aerosol life cycles, and mass or energy exchanges with the Earth's surface. In order to identify model deficiencies and improve predictive skills, it is important to obtain process-level understanding of the interactions between different processes. Conditional sampling and budget analysis are powerful tools for process-oriented model evaluation, but they often require tedious ad hoc coding and large amounts of instantaneous model output, resulting in inefficient use of human and computing resources. This paper presents an online diagnostic tool that addresses this challenge by monitoring model variables in a generic manner as they evolve within the time integration cycle. The tool is convenient to use. It allows users to select sampling conditions and specify monitored variables at run time. Both the evolving values of the model variables and their increments caused by different atmospheric processes can be monitored and archived. Online calculation of vertical integrals is also supported. Multiple sampling conditions can be monitored in a single simulation in combination with unconditional sampling. The paper explains in detail the design and implementation of the tool in the Energy Exascale Earth System Model (E3SM) version 1. The usage is demonstrated through three examples: a global budget analysis of dust aerosol mass concentration, a composite analysis of sea salt emission and its dependency on surface wind speed, and a conditionally sampled relative humidity budget. The tool is expected to be easily portable to closely related atmospheric models that use the same or similar data structures and time integration methods.

[1]  Quantifying and attributing time step sensitivities in present-day climate simulations conducted with EAMv1 , 2021 .

[2]  P. Rasch,et al.  Influence of sea-ice anomalies on Antarctic precipitation using source attribution in the Community Earth System Model , 2020, The Cryosphere.

[3]  J. Mülmenstädt,et al.  Surprising similarities in model and observational aerosol radiative forcing estimates , 2019, Atmospheric chemistry and physics.

[4]  C. S. Zender,et al.  An Overview of the Atmospheric Component of the Energy Exascale Earth System Model , 2019, Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems.

[5]  A. Bailey,et al.  Evaluating a Moist Isentropic Framework for Poleward Moisture Transport: Implications for Water Isotopes Over Antarctica , 2019, Geophysical Research Letters.

[6]  Philip W. Jones,et al.  The DOE E3SM Coupled Model Version 1: Overview and Evaluation at Standard Resolution , 2019, Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems.

[7]  N. McFarlane,et al.  Sensitivity of Climate Simulations to the Parameterization of Cumulus Convection in the Canadian Climate Centre General Circulation Model , 1995, Data, Models and Analysis.

[8]  R. Neale,et al.  Understanding Cloud and Convective Characteristics in Version 1 of the E3SM Atmosphere Model , 2018, Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems.

[9]  R. Leung,et al.  Impact of numerical choices on water conservation in the E3SM Atmosphere Model version 1 (EAMv1) , 2017 .

[10]  Vincent E. Larson,et al.  CLUBB-SILHS: A parameterization of subgrid variability in the atmosphere , 2017, 1711.03675.

[11]  C. Bitz,et al.  A mathematical framework for analysis of water tracers: Part 1: Development of theory and application to the preindustrial mean state , 2016 .

[12]  S. Ghan,et al.  Challenges in constraining anthropogenic aerosol effects on cloud radiative forcing using present-day spatiotemporal variability , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[13]  P. Rasch,et al.  Quantifying sources of black carbon in western North America using observationally based analysis and an emission tagging technique in the Community Atmosphere Model , 2015 .

[14]  S. Ghan,et al.  Quantifying the impact of sub-grid surface wind variability on sea salt and dust emissions in CAM5 , 2015 .

[15]  Andrew Gettelman,et al.  Advanced two-moment bulk microphysics for global models. Part I: off-line tests and comparison with other schemes. , 2015 .

[16]  S. Ghan,et al.  Using an explicit emission tagging method in global modeling of source‐receptor relationships for black carbon in the Arctic: Variations, sources, and transport pathways , 2014 .

[17]  S. Bony,et al.  On the Correspondence between Mean Forecast Errors and Climate Errors in CMIP5 Models , 2013 .

[18]  Shaocheng Xie,et al.  Metrics and Diagnostics for Precipitation-Related Processes in Climate Model Short-Range Hindcasts , 2013 .

[19]  Shaocheng Xie,et al.  On the Correspondence between Short- and Long-Time-Scale Systematic Errors in CAM4/CAM5 for the Year of Tropical Convection , 2012 .

[20]  U. Lohmann,et al.  The global aerosol-climate model ECHAM-HAM, version 2: sensitivity to improvements in process representations , 2012 .

[21]  Masahiro Watanabe,et al.  The Transpose-AMIP II Experiment and Its Application to the Understanding of Southern Ocean Cloud Biases in Climate Models , 2012 .

[22]  Richard Neale,et al.  Toward a Minimal Representation of Aerosols in Climate Models: Description and Evaluation in the Community Atmosphere Model CAM5 , 2012 .

[23]  Mariana Vertenstein,et al.  A new flexible coupler for earth system modeling developed for CCSM4 and CESM1 , 2012, Int. J. High Perform. Comput. Appl..

[24]  Thomas Reichler,et al.  Analysis and Reduction of Systematic Errors through a Seamless Approach to Modeling Weather and Climate , 2010 .

[25]  Philip J. Rasch,et al.  Effects of Convective Momentum Transport on the Atmospheric Circulation in the Community Atmosphere Model, Version 3 , 2008 .

[26]  David L. Williamson,et al.  Moisture and temperature balances at the Atmospheric Radiation Measurement Southern Great Plains Site in forecasts with the Community Atmosphere Model (CAM2) , 2005 .

[27]  V. Larson,et al.  Using Probability Density Functions to Derive Consistent Closure Relationships among Higher-Order Moments , 2005 .

[28]  David L. Williamson,et al.  Evaluating Parameterizations in General Circulation Models: Climate Simulation Meets Weather Prediction , 2004 .

[29]  E. Nilsson,et al.  Laboratory simulations and parameterization of the primary marine aerosol production , 2003 .

[30]  Vincent E. Larson,et al.  A PDF-Based Model for Boundary Layer Clouds. Part I: Method and Model Description , 2002 .