Localization in Sensor Networks with Limited Number of Anchors and Clustered Placement

Many localization algorithms have been proposed in recent years. Although different algorithms based on different methodologies, the use of anchors is common to most algorithms. The placement and the density of anchors affect the accuracy of different algorithms to different extent. Location estimates are usually more accurate with a higher density of anchors. When there are only a few anchors, efficient algorithms tend to perform poorly. However, having more anchors will increase the cost of a sensor network. In this paper, we present an algorithm which uses two different localization techniques, multidimensional scaling (MDS) and proximity-distance map (PDM), in a phased approach. MDS has a high complexity but can give good results when there are only very few anchors. PDM, on the other hand, is a distributed algorithm but performs poorly when anchors are scarce. The phased approach has comparable complexity to PDM but less than MDS. With extensive simulations, we demonstrate that the proposed algorithm gives accurate solution with very few anchors or clustered anchors which is intrinsically a difficult challenge to most existing algorithms.

[1]  L. El Ghaoui,et al.  Convex position estimation in wireless sensor networks , 2001, Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM 2001. Conference on Computer Communications. Twentieth Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Society (Cat. No.01CH37213).

[2]  Hyuk Lim,et al.  Localization for anisotropic sensor networks , 2005, Proceedings IEEE 24th Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies..

[3]  Ying Zhang,et al.  Localization from mere connectivity , 2003, MobiHoc '03.

[4]  B. R. Badrinath,et al.  Ad hoc positioning system (APS) , 2001, GLOBECOM'01. IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference (Cat. No.01CH37270).

[5]  Hongchi Shi,et al.  Performance study of localization methods for ad-hoc sensor networks , 2004, 2004 IEEE International Conference on Mobile Ad-hoc and Sensor Systems (IEEE Cat. No.04EX975).

[6]  Mani B. Srivastava,et al.  On the Error Characteristics of Multihop Node Localization in Ad-Hoc Sensor Networks , 2003, IPSN.

[7]  Mani B. Srivastava,et al.  The bits and flops of the n-hop multilateration primitive for node localization problems , 2002, WSNA '02.

[8]  Yinyu Ye,et al.  Semidefinite programming for ad hoc wireless sensor network localization , 2004, Third International Symposium on Information Processing in Sensor Networks, 2004. IPSN 2004.

[9]  Patrick J. F. Groenen,et al.  Modern Multidimensional Scaling: Theory and Applications , 2003 .

[10]  Hongchi Shi,et al.  SHARP: a new approach to relative localization in wireless sensor networks , 2005, 25th IEEE International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems Workshops.

[11]  P. Groenen,et al.  Modern multidimensional scaling , 1996 .

[12]  Jan M. Rabaey,et al.  Robust Positioning Algorithms for Distributed Ad-Hoc Wireless Sensor Networks , 2002, USENIX Annual Technical Conference, General Track.

[13]  Koen Langendoen,et al.  Distributed localization in wireless sensor networks: a quantitative compariso , 2003, Comput. Networks.

[14]  Wheeler Ruml,et al.  Improved MDS-based localization , 2004, IEEE INFOCOM 2004.

[15]  King Lun Yiu Ad-hoc positioning system , 2008 .