Metabolic and Respiratory Costs of Increasing Song Amplitude in Zebra Finches

Bird song is a widely used model in the study of animal communication and sexual selection, and several song features have been shown to reflect the quality of the singer. Recent studies have demonstrated that song amplitude may be an honest signal of current condition in males and that females prefer high amplitude songs. In addition, birds raise the amplitude of their songs to communicate in noisy environments. Although it is generally assumed that louder song should be more costly to produce, there has been little empirical evidence to support this assumption. We tested the assumption by measuring oxygen consumption and respiratory patterns in adult male zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata) singing at different amplitudes in different background noise conditions. As background noise levels increased, birds significantly increased the sound pressure level of their songs. We found that louder songs required significantly greater subsyringeal air sac pressure than quieter songs. Though increased pressure is probably achieved by increasing respiratory muscle activity, these increases did not correlate with measurable increases in oxygen consumption. In addition, we found that oxygen consumption increased in higher background noise, independent of singing behaviour. This observation supports previous research in mammals showing that high levels of environmental noise can induce physiological stress responses. While our study did not find that increasing vocal amplitude increased metabolic costs, further research is needed to determine whether there are other non-metabolic costs of singing louder or costs associated with chronic noise exposure.

[1]  Janice C. Daniel,et al.  The structure, meaning and function of yellow-bellied marmot pup screams , 2008, Animal Behaviour.

[2]  P. K. McGregor,et al.  Animal Communication Networks: Behaviours specific to communication networks , 2005 .

[3]  Marc Naguib,et al.  Chapter 1 Environmental Acoustics and the Evolution of Bird Song , 2009 .

[4]  D. Todt,et al.  Male–male vocal interactions and the adjustment of song amplitude in a territorial bird , 2004, Animal Behaviour.

[5]  H. Brumm,et al.  Acoustic Communication in Noise , 2005 .

[6]  P. Slater,et al.  Animals can vary signal amplitude with receiver distance: evidence from zebra finch song , 2006, Animal Behaviour.

[7]  Franz Goller,et al.  Peripheral Motor Dynamics of Song Production in the Zebra Finch , 2004, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[8]  S. Bensch,et al.  Daily energy expenditure of singing great reed warblers Acrocephalus arundinaceus , 2008 .

[9]  Influence of external stimuli on the quality of the song of the zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttata castanotis Gould) , 2010 .

[10]  J. A. MULLIGAN,et al.  Bird Song , 1964, Nature.

[11]  Clive K. Catchpole,et al.  Bird song: Biological themes and variations, 2nd ed. , 2008 .

[12]  Tobias Riede,et al.  Nonlinear acoustics in the pant hoots of common chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes): vocalizing at the edge. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  Peter Marler,et al.  Behavioral neurobiology of birdsong , 2004 .

[14]  P. Slater,et al.  Singing is not energetically demanding for pied flycatchers, Ficedula hypoleuca , 2004 .

[15]  Franz Goller,et al.  Respiratory patterns and oxygen consumption in singing zebra finches , 2003, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[16]  K. Riebel Chapter 6 Song and Female Mate Choice in Zebra Finches: A Review , 2009 .

[17]  Robert J Dooling,et al.  The effect of altered auditory feedback on control of vocal production in budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus). , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  Edward F Chang,et al.  Environmental Noise Retards Auditory Cortical Development , 2003, Science.

[19]  H. Brumm,et al.  Female zebra finches prefer high-amplitude song , 2010, Animal Behaviour.

[20]  E. Seifert,et al.  An update in thinking about nonorganic voice disorders. , 2006, Archives of otolaryngology--head & neck surgery.

[21]  W. Nachtigall,et al.  Metabolic power of European starlings Sturnus vulgaris during flight in a wind tunnel, estimated from heat transfer modelling, doubly labelled water and mask respirometry , 2004, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[22]  W. E. Wood,et al.  SONG SPARROW (MELOSPIZA MELODIA) SONG VARIES WITH URBAN NOISE , 2006 .

[23]  Stan Boutin,et al.  Impacts of Chronic Anthropogenic Noise from Energy‐Sector Activity on Abundance of Songbirds in the Boreal Forest , 2008, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[24]  Kevin R Crooks,et al.  The costs of chronic noise exposure for terrestrial organisms. , 2010, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[25]  F. Goller,et al.  Bilaterally symmetrical respiratory activity during lateralized birdsong. , 1999, Journal of neurobiology.

[26]  Torben Dabelsteen,et al.  Animal Communication Networks: Public, private or anonymous? Facilitating and countering eavesdropping , 2005 .

[27]  R. Hinde,et al.  Advances in the study of behavior , 1966 .

[28]  Lars Schrader,et al.  Noise-dependent vocal plasticity in domestic fowl , 2009, Animal Behaviour.

[29]  F. Goller,et al.  Functional morphology of the sound‐generating labia in the syrinx of two songbird species , 2010, Journal of anatomy.

[30]  H. Herzel,et al.  SUBHARMONICS, BIPHONATION, AND DETERMINISTIC CHAOS IN MAMMAL VOCALIZATION , 1998 .

[31]  H. Brumm,et al.  Song amplitude affects territorial aggression of male receivers in chaffinches , 2011 .

[32]  Graham N Askew,et al.  The metabolic power requirements of flight and estimations of flight muscle efficiency in the cockatiel (Nymphicus hollandicus) , 2010, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[33]  F. Goller,et al.  Beak gape dynamics during song in the zebra finch. , 2004, Journal of neurobiology.

[34]  M. McClean,et al.  The effects of excessive vocalization on acoustic and videostroboscopic measures of vocal fold condition. , 1999, Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation.

[35]  H. Herzel,et al.  SPOTTED HYAENA WHOOPS: FREQUENT INCIDENCE OF VOCAL INSTABILITIES IN A MAMMALIAN LOUD CALL , 2004 .

[36]  I R Titze,et al.  Vocal intensity in speakers and singers. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[37]  Torben Dabelsteen,et al.  Directionality of Blackbird vocalization. Implications for vocal communication and its further study , 1990 .

[38]  P. Marler,et al.  Neuroscience of Birdsong , 2012 .

[39]  F. Cerny,et al.  Effects of varied vocal intensity on ventilation and energy expenditure in women and men. , 1998, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[40]  Johan Sundberg,et al.  Phonetogram and averages of sound pressure levels and fundamental frequencies of speech: Comparison between female singers and nonsingers , 1992 .

[41]  Kui-cheng Zheng,et al.  Modulations of Immune Functions and Oxidative Status Induced by Noise Stress , 2007, Journal of occupational health.

[42]  H. Brumm,et al.  Zebra finch song reflects current food availability , 2012, Evolutionary Ecology.

[43]  Martin Cooke,et al.  Spectral and temporal changes to speech produced in the presence of energetic and informational maskers. , 2010, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[44]  P. Withers,et al.  Measurement of VO2, VCO2, and evaporative water loss with a flow-through mask. , 1977, Journal of applied physiology: respiratory, environmental and exercise physiology.

[45]  F. Goller,et al.  Singing with reduced air sac volume causes uniform decrease in airflow and sound amplitude in the zebra finch , 2008, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[46]  P. J. B. Slater,et al.  Bird Song: Contents , 2008 .

[47]  H. Slabbekoorn,et al.  Fluid dynamics: Vortex rings in a constant electric field , 2003, Nature.

[48]  G. Arnold Vocal nodules and polyps: laryngeal tissue reaction to habitual hyperkinetic dysphonia. , 1962, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.

[49]  H. Brumm,et al.  Blackbirds sing higher-pitched songs in cities: adaptation to habitat acoustics or side-effect of urbanization? , 2009, Animal Behaviour.

[50]  M. Jessen,et al.  Influence of vocal effort on average and variability of fundamental frequency , 2005 .

[51]  Erin M. Bayne,et al.  Chronic industrial noise affects pairing success and age structure of ovenbirds Seiurus aurocapilla , 2006 .

[52]  H. Brumm The impact of environmental noise on song amplitude in a territorial bird , 2004 .

[53]  Esteban Fernández-Juricic,et al.  Microhabitat Selection and Singing Behavior Patterns of Male House Finches ( Carpodacus mexicanus ) in Urban Parks in a Heavily Urbanized Landscape in the Western U . S . * , 2006 .

[54]  Dietmar Todt,et al.  Noise-dependent song amplitude regulation in a territorial songbird , 2002, Animal Behaviour.

[55]  J. Sundberg,et al.  Child voice and noise: a pilot study of noise in day cares and the effects on 10 children's voice quality according to perceptual evaluation. , 2009, Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation.

[56]  F. Goller,et al.  Motor Correlates of Vocal Diversity in Songbirds , 1997 .

[57]  P. Slater,et al.  The energy cost of song in the canary, Serinus canaria , 2003, Animal Behaviour.

[58]  F Goller,et al.  The metabolic cost of birdsong production. , 2001, The Journal of experimental biology.

[59]  J. Cynx,et al.  Amplitude regulation of vocalizations in noise by a songbird,Taeniopygia guttata , 1998, Animal Behaviour.

[60]  E. Vannoni,et al.  Fallow bucks get hoarse: vocal fatigue as a possible signal to conspecifics , 2009, Animal Behaviour.

[61]  Clinton D. Francis,et al.  Noise Pollution Changes Avian Communities and Species Interactions , 2009, Current Biology.

[62]  R. Sossinka,et al.  Song Types in the Zebra Finch Poephila guttata castanotis1 , 1980 .

[63]  Manfred Gahr,et al.  The honesty of bird song: multiple constraints for multiple traits , 2002 .