Look but don't touch: Visual cues to surface structure drive somatosensory cortex

When planning interactions with nearby objects, our brain uses visual information to estimate shape, material composition, and surface structure before we come into contact with them. Here we analyse brain activations elicited by different types of visual appearance, measuring fMRI responses to objects that are glossy, matte, rough, or textured. In addition to activation in visual areas, we found that fMRI responses are evoked in the secondary somatosensory area (S2) when looking at glossy and rough surfaces. This activity could be reliably discriminated on the basis of tactile-related visual properties (gloss, rough, and matte), but importantly, other visual properties (i.e., coloured texture) did not substantially change fMRI activity. The activity could not be solely due to tactile imagination, as asking explicitly to imagine such surface properties did not lead to the same results. These findings suggest that visual cues to an object's surface properties evoke activity in neural circuits associated with tactile stimulation. This activation may reflect the a-priori probability of the physics of the interaction (i.e., the expectation of upcoming friction) that can be used to plan finger placement and grasp force.

[1]  Hiroshi Ando,et al.  Human cortical areas involved in perception of surface glossiness , 2014, NeuroImage.

[2]  S-J Blakemore,et al.  Somatosensory activations during the observation of touch and a case of vision-touch synaesthesia. , 2005, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[3]  G. Pagnoni,et al.  Does Anticipation of Pain Affect Cortical Nociceptive Systems? , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[4]  Rainer Goebel,et al.  Roughness perception of unfamiliar dot pattern textures. , 2013, Acta psychologica.

[5]  Hideki Nakano,et al.  Brain Activity during the Observation, Imagery, and Execution of Tool Use: An fNIRS/EEG Study , 2012 .

[6]  Cristina Simões-Franklin,et al.  Active and passive touch differentially activate somatosensory cortex in texture perception , 2011, Human brain mapping.

[7]  Gouki Okazawa,et al.  Selective responses to specular surfaces in the macaque visual cortex revealed by fMRI , 2012, NeuroImage.

[8]  R. Klatzky,et al.  Haptic exploration in the presence of vision. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[9]  Barton L Anderson,et al.  Image statistics do not explain the perception of gloss and lightness. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[10]  J. Randall Flanagan,et al.  Representation of Object Weight in Human Ventral Visual Cortex , 2014, Current Biology.

[11]  Guy A. Orban,et al.  The Extraction of Depth Structure from Shading and Texture in the Macaque Brain , 2009, PloS one.

[12]  Amir Amedi,et al.  Combined activation and deactivation of visual cortex during tactile sensory processing. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[13]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[14]  Naokazu Goda,et al.  Transformation from image-based to perceptual representation of materials along the human ventral visual pathway , 2011, NeuroImage.

[15]  A. Ghazanfar,et al.  Is neocortex essentially multisensory? , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[16]  Delphine Picard,et al.  Partial perceptual equivalence between vision and touch for texture information. , 2006, Acta psychologica.

[17]  Mark Jenkinson,et al.  Correspondences between retinotopic areas and myelin maps in human visual cortex , 2014, NeuroImage.

[18]  Karsten Mueller,et al.  Judging roughness by sight—A 7‐tesla fMRI study on responsivity of the primary somatosensory cortex during observed touch of self and others , 2013, Human brain mapping.

[19]  M. Landy,et al.  Conjoint Measurement of Gloss and Surface Texture , 2008, Psychological science.

[20]  Rainer Goebel,et al.  The neural substrate for working memory of tactile surface texture , 2013, Human brain mapping.

[21]  Phillip J. Marlow,et al.  The perception of gloss depends on highlight congruence with surface shading. , 2011, Journal of vision.

[22]  H Burton,et al.  Response patterns in second somatosensory cortex (SII) of awake monkeys to passively applied tactile gratings. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[23]  G. Orban,et al.  Attention to 3-D Shape, 3-D Motion, and Texture in 3-D Structure from Motion Displays , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[24]  R Vogels,et al.  Effects of surface cues on macaque inferior temporal cortical responses. , 2003, Cerebral cortex.

[25]  Hiroshi Ban,et al.  fMRI evidence for areas that process surface gloss in the human visual cortex , 2015, Vision Research.

[26]  Riitta Hari,et al.  Activation of the human primary motor cortex during observation of tool use , 2004, NeuroImage.

[27]  Barton L Anderson,et al.  The role of brightness and orientation congruence in the perception of surface gloss. , 2011, Journal of vision.

[28]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  Cortical Regions Involved in Perceiving Object Shape , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[29]  S. Lederman,et al.  Texture perception: studies of intersensory organization using a discrepancy paradigm, and visual versus tactual psychophysics. , 1981, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[30]  Fraser W. Smith,et al.  Decoding Visual Object Categories in Early Somatosensory Cortex , 2013, Cerebral cortex.

[31]  K. Zilles,et al.  Areas 3a, 3b, and 1 of Human Primary Somatosensory Cortex 2. Spatial Normalization to Standard Anatomical Space , 2000, NeuroImage.

[32]  Randall Stilla,et al.  Selective visuo‐haptic processing of shape and texture , 2008, Human brain mapping.

[33]  Robert W. Kentridge,et al.  Separate processing of texture and form in the ventral stream: evidence from FMRI and visual agnosia. , 2010, Cerebral cortex.

[34]  Robert W. Kentridge,et al.  Separate channels for processing form, texture, and color: evidence from FMRI adaptation and visual object agnosia. , 2010, Cerebral cortex.

[35]  Astrid M. L. Kappers,et al.  The Influence of Material Cues on Early Grasping Force , 2014, EuroHaptics.

[36]  E. Adelson,et al.  Image statistics and the perception of surface qualities , 2007, Nature.

[37]  Xiaoping Hu,et al.  Dual pathways for haptic and visual perception of spatial and texture information , 2011, NeuroImage.

[38]  G. Orban,et al.  The kinetic occipital region in human visual cortex. , 1997, Cerebral cortex.

[39]  Simon B. Eickhoff,et al.  Testing anatomically specified hypotheses in functional imaging using cytoarchitectonic maps , 2006, NeuroImage.

[40]  Jonathan S. Cant,et al.  fMR-adaptation reveals separate processing regions for the perception of form and texture in the human ventral stream , 2008, Experimental Brain Research.

[41]  Alex R. Wade,et al.  Extended Concepts of Occipital Retinotopy , 2005 .

[42]  P. Roland,et al.  Shape and roughness activate different somatosensory areas in the human brain. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[43]  Christiane B Wiebel,et al.  Visual and haptic representations of material properties. , 2013, Multisensory research.

[44]  Jonathan S. Cant,et al.  Living in a material world: how visual cues to material properties affect the way that we lift objects and perceive their weight. , 2009, Journal of neurophysiology.

[45]  R. Fleming Visual perception of materials and their properties , 2014, Vision Research.

[46]  Ruey-Song Huang,et al.  Dodecapus: An MR-compatible system for somatosensory stimulation , 2007, NeuroImage.

[47]  B. Jones,et al.  Combining vision and touch in texture perception , 1985, Perception & psychophysics.

[48]  Gouki Okazawa,et al.  Representation of the Material Properties of Objects in the Visual Cortex of Nonhuman Primates , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[49]  Susan J. Lederman,et al.  Tactile estimation of the roughness of gratings yields a graded response in the human brain: an fMRI study , 2005, NeuroImage.

[50]  A. Kappers,et al.  Haptic and visual perception of roughness. , 2007, Acta psychologica.

[51]  Simon B. Eickhoff,et al.  Assignment of functional activations to probabilistic cytoarchitectonic areas revisited , 2007, NeuroImage.

[52]  A. Schleicher,et al.  Areas 3a, 3b, and 1 of Human Primary Somatosensory Cortex 1. Microstructural Organization and Interindividual Variability , 1999, NeuroImage.

[53]  Jonathan S. Cant,et al.  Cerebral Cortex Advance Access published April 28, 2006 Attention to Form or Surface Properties Modulates Different Regions of Human , 2022 .

[54]  Justine Cléry,et al.  Whole brain mapping of visual and tactile convergence in the macaque monkey , 2015, NeuroImage.

[55]  S. Zeki,et al.  The processing of kinetic contours in the brain. , 2003, Cerebral cortex.

[56]  Atsushi Iriki,et al.  Visual Responsiveness of Neurons in the Secondary Somatosensory Area and its Surrounding Parietal Operculum Regions in Awake Macaque Monkeys , 2015, Cerebral cortex.

[57]  E. DeYoe,et al.  Mapping striate and extrastriate visual areas in human cerebral cortex. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[58]  Marc O. Ernst,et al.  A Bayesian view on multimodal cue integration , 2006 .

[59]  T. Hendler,et al.  Visuo-haptic object-related activation in the ventral visual pathway , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[60]  Rainer Goebel,et al.  Crossmodal interactions of haptic and visual texture information in early sensory cortex , 2013, NeuroImage.

[61]  Fiona N. Newell,et al.  Vision and touch: Independent or integrated systems for the perception of texture? , 2008, Brain Research.

[62]  Guy A. Orban,et al.  The Extraction of 3D Shape from Texture and Shading in the Human Brain , 2008, Cerebral cortex.

[63]  Michael S Landy,et al.  Orientation selectivity of motion-boundary responses in human visual cortex. , 2010, Journal of neurophysiology.

[64]  C. Spence,et al.  Tactile dominance in speeded discrimination of textures , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[65]  K. Carlsson,et al.  Tickling Expectations: Neural Processing in Anticipation of a Sensory Stimulus , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[66]  Chris I Baker,et al.  Seeing Is Not Feeling: Posterior Parietal But Not Somatosensory Cortex Engagement During Touch Observation , 2015, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[67]  Gereon R Fink,et al.  The somatotopic organization of cytoarchitectonic areas on the human parietal operculum. , 2007, Cerebral cortex.

[68]  Guy A Orban,et al.  Coding of images of materials by macaque inferior temporal cortical neurons , 2008, The European journal of neuroscience.

[69]  Marc O. Ernst,et al.  Computational Aspects of Softness Perception , 2014, Multisensory Softness.

[70]  K. Grill-Spector,et al.  The dynamics of object-selective activation correlate with recognition performance in humans , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[71]  Simon B. Eickhoff,et al.  A new SPM toolbox for combining probabilistic cytoarchitectonic maps and functional imaging data , 2005, NeuroImage.

[72]  J W Belliveau,et al.  Borders of multiple visual areas in humans revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging. , 1995, Science.

[73]  C. Porro,et al.  Percept-related activity in the human somatosensory system: functional magnetic resonance imaging studies. , 2004, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[74]  Patrizia Baraldi,et al.  Functional activity mapping of the mesial hemispheric wall during anticipation of pain , 2003, NeuroImage.

[75]  John J. Foxe,et al.  Multisensory contributions to low-level, ‘unisensory’ processing , 2005, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[76]  L. Fogassi,et al.  A Touching Sight SII/PV Activation during the Observation and Experience of Touch , 2004, Neuron.