Horizontal Mechanisms Under Differing IS Organization Contexts

Horizontal mechanisms are structural overlays (such as roles and groups) and non-structural devices (such as physical co-location) that are designed to facilitate cross-unit collaboration. The objective of this study is to increase our cumulative knowledge about what top-down mechanisms are being used to promote the coordination of IS activities across corporate/division boundaries. Propositions about how mechanism usage differs under Centralized versus Federal IS organization contexts are developed based on a synthesis of prior organization science and empirical IS literature. Multiple methods are used to collect data from IS and non-IS senior managers from two case sites with theoretically different IS coordination needs. As predicted, multiple types of structural and non-structural mechanisms were implemented for business-IS coordination in the company with a Centralized IS context, and for corporate IS-decentralized IS coordination in the company with a Federal IS context. An unexpected finding was that mechanisms for both of these kinds of IS coordination were valued at each case site. The prediction that a formal group mechanism would be perceived as more effective for achieving cross-unit coordination than an integrator role mechanism was not supported. The article concludes with a discussion of implications for research and practice.

[1]  Tor Guimaraes,et al.  Selecting MIS projects by steering committee , 1985, CACM.

[2]  Carol V. Brown,et al.  Reconceptualizing the Context-Design Issue for the Information Systems Function , 1998 .

[3]  R. E. Miles,et al.  Organizations: New Concepts for New Forms , 1986 .

[4]  Weidong Xia,et al.  Managing Telecommunications by Steering Committee , 1992, MIS Q..

[5]  R. Yin.  Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[6]  Lynda M. Applegate,et al.  Managing in an Information Age: Transforming the Organization for the 1990s , 1994, Transforming Organizations with Information Technology.

[7]  Susan Albers Mohrman,et al.  Designing Team-Based Organizations: New Forms for Knowledge Work , 1995 .

[8]  Y. Gupta,et al.  Impact of Information Systems (IS) Steering Committees on IS Planning , 1989 .

[9]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  The Case Research Strategy in Studies of Information Systems , 1987, MIS Q..

[10]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Coordination of Information Technology Management: Team-Based Structures and Computer-based Communication Systems , 1994, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[11]  Thomas D. Clark,et al.  Corporate systems management: an overview and research perspective , 1992, CACM.

[12]  D. Ulrich.  From The Ground Up: Six Principles for Building the New Logic Corporation , 1996 .

[13]  T. S. Raghunathan,et al.  Impact of the CEO's participation on information systems steering committees , 1992 .

[14]  Robert E. Hoskisson,et al.  Cooperative Versus Competitive Structures in Related and Unrelated Diversified Firms , 1992 .

[15]  C. Prahalad,et al.  Competing for the Future , 1994 .

[16]  Donald H. Drury,et al.  An Evaluation of Data Processing Steering Committees , 1984, MIS Q..

[17]  Tor Guimaraes,et al.  A comparative analysis of MIS project selection mechanisms , 1994, DATB.

[18]  P. Lawrence,et al.  Organization and environment , 1967 .

[19]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  The information economy: A new perspective for effective information systems management , 1986, DATB.

[20]  Joyce J. Elam,et al.  New Information Systems Leaders: A Changing Role in a Changing World , 1992, MIS Q..

[21]  Paul J. Dixon,et al.  Technology Issues Facing Corporate Management in the 1990s , 1989, MIS Q..

[22]  William J. Doll,et al.  The relationship of MIS steering committees to size of firm and formalization of MIS planning , 1987, CACM.

[23]  Ian M. Mitchell,et al.  Strategic Organization Design: Concepts, Tools & Processes , 1990 .

[24]  Carol V. Brown,et al.  Alignment of the IS Functions With the Enterprise: Toward a Model of Antecedents , 1994, MIS Q..

[25]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  Organization Theory and Design , 1983 .

[26]  Carol V. Brown,et al.  Managing Information Technology: What Managers Need to Know , 1994 .

[27]  R. E. Miles,et al.  Trust in organizations: A conceptual framework linking organizational forms, managerial philosophies, and the opportunity costs of controls. , 1996 .

[28]  C. Hill.  International Business: Competing in the Global Marketplace , 1996 .

[29]  Henry Mintzberg,et al.  The Structuring of Organizations , 1979 .

[30]  M. Porter.  Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance , 1985 .

[31]  Markku Sääksjärvi,et al.  The roles and success of IS steering committees: An empirical evaluation , 1994, ECIS.

[32]  J. Rockart,et al.  EIGHT IMPERATIVES FOR THE NEW IT ORGANIZATION , 1996 .

[33]  Michael J. Earl,et al.  Information Management: The Organizational Dimension , 1996 .

[34]  Jay R. Galbraith.  Competing with flexible lateral organizations , 1993 .

[35]  Janette Moody,et al.  Toward a Better Understanding of Information Technology Organization: A Comparative Case Study , 1992, MIS Q..

[36]  John C. Henderson,et al.  Entrepreneur or Intermediary: The Nature of the Relationship Manager's Job , 1995, ICIS.

[37]  Jay R. Galbraith.  Designing Complex Organizations , 1973 .

[38]  E. Larson,et al.  Matrix Management: Contradictions and Insights , 1987 .

[39]  DeSanctisGerardine,et al.  Coordination of information technology management , 1994 .

[40]  Michael J. Earl,et al.  Management Strategies for Information Technology , 1989 .