Corporate Social Responsibility: Views from the Frontline

This paper offers an evaluation of corporate policy and practice in respect of corporate social responsibility (CSR) deriving from an analysis of qualitative data, obtained during semi-structured interviews with the representatives of 16 companies from a variety of UK sectors including retail, mining, financial services and mobile telephony. The findings of the empirical survey are presented in five sections that trace chronologically the process of CSR policy development. The first identifies the meaning attributed to CSR by the respondent companies followed in the second section by the factors that are driving them to implement the CSR agenda. The third examines the use of the language of CSR and the concept’s role as either a substantive concept or simple label. The fourth identifies the criteria used for determining CSR policies and the objectives underlying them. The fifth and final section offers an analysis of the respondents’ predictions as to the future development of CSR. On the basis of the findings of the survey, this paper argues that, despite genuine attempts on the part of those responsible for CSR policy development to address stakeholder concerns, the context within which CSR has been implemented hinders its potential to offer stakeholders sufficient information by which to evaluate corporate performance in respect of CSR and the ability of CSR to operate as a meaningful and systematic constraint on corporate behaviour.

[1]  C. Cowton,et al.  The Maturing of Socially Responsible Investment: A Review of the Developing Link with Corporate Social Responsibility , 2004 .

[2]  T. Das.  How Strong are the Ethical Preferences of Senior Business Executives? , 2005 .

[3]  M. Drumwright.  Socially Responsible Organizational Buying: Environmental Concern as a Noneconomic Buying Criterion , 1994 .

[4]  D. Melé,et al.  Corporate Social Responsibility Theories: Mapping the Territory , 2004 .

[5]  The Ethics of Corporate Social Responsibility and Philanthropic Venturesl , 2001 .

[6]  J. Parkinson.  Corporate power and responsibility , 1993 .

[7]  Jacqueline Cramer,et al.  Making Sense of Corporate Social Responsibility , 2004 .

[8]  Catherine C. Marshall,et al.  Designing Qualitative Research , 1996 .

[9]  A. Carroll.  The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders , 1991 .

[10]  Joshua Krausz,et al.  Criteria for Evaluating the Legitimacy of Corporate Social Responsibility , 1997 .

[11]  M. Friedman,et al.  Capitalism and Freedom , 1963 .

[12]  P. Ireland.  Corporate Governance, Stakeholding and the Company: Towards a Less Degenerate Capitalism , 1996 .

[13]  Lois A. Mohr,et al.  Do Consumers Expect Companies to Be Socially Responsible? the Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on Buying Behavior , 2001 .

[14]  D. Swanson.  Addressing a Theoretical Problem by Reorienting the Corporate Social Performance Model , 1995 .

[15]  N. Minow.  Corporate Charity: An Oxymoron? , 1999 .

[16]  S. Sethi,et al.  Investing in Socially Responsible Companies is a must for Public Pension Funds – Because there is no Better Alternative , 2005 .

[17]  M. Clarkson.  A Stakeholder Framework for Analyzing and Evaluating Corporate Social Performance , 1995 .

[18]  T. Guay,et al.  Non-Governmental Organizations, Shareholder Activism, and Socially Responsible Investments: Ethical, Strategic, and Governance Implications , 2004 .

[19]  Kai Hockerts,et al.  Communicating Corporate Responsibility to Investors: The Changing Role of the Investor Relations Function , 2004 .

[20]  Keith Davis,et al.  Can Business Afford to Ignore Social Responsibilities? , 1960 .

[21]  C. Hemingway,et al.  Managers' Personal Values as Drivers of Corporate Social Responsibility , 2004 .

[22]  I. Maignan.  Corporate citizenship as a marketing instrument: concepts, evidence and research directions , 2001 .

[23]  G. Moore,et al.  Corporate Philanthropy in the U.K. 1985–2000 Some Empirical Findings , 2002 .

[24]  R. Sarre,et al.  Reducing the Risk of Corporate Irresponsibility: The Trend to Corporate Social Responsibility , 2001 .

[25]  Gardiner C. Means,et al.  The Modern Corporation and Private Property. , 1934 .

[26]  Stuart L. Esrock,et al.  Social responsibility and corporate web pages: Self-presentation or agenda-setting? , 1998 .

[27]  Geoff Moore,et al.  Corporate Social and Financial Performance: An Investigation in the U.K. Supermarket Industry , 2001 .

[28]  J. Holmes,et al.  Cause-Related Marketing , 1993 .

[29]  Sandra Waddock.  Integrity and Mindfulness : Foundations of corporate citizenship* , 2001 .

[30]  Diana C. Robertson,et al.  Expressions of corporate social responsibility in U.K. firms , 1996 .

[31]  H. Vos.  Trade and Industry , 1946 .

[32]  William T. Ross,et al.  The impact of corporate behavior on perceived product value , 1996 .

[33]  E. Jansson,et al.  The Stakeholder Model: The Influence of the Ownership and Governance Structures , 2005 .

[34]  J. Barnard.  Corporate Philanthropy, Executives' Pet Charities and the Agency Problem , 1997 .

[35]  Peter A. Dacin,et al.  The Company and the Product: Corporate Associations and Consumer Product Responses , 1997 .

[36]  T. May.  Social Research: Issues, Methods and Process , 2001 .

[37]  D. Wood.  Corporate Social Performance Revisited , 1991 .

[38]  Jörg Andriof,et al.  Unfolding Stakeholder Thinking: Theory, Responsibility and Engagement , 2002 .