Making up your mind: Enhanced perceptual decision-making induced by stochastic resonance during non-invasive brain stimulation: Stochastic resonance in perceptual decision-making

Perceptual decision-making relies on the gradual accumulation of noisy sensory evidence until a specified boundary is reached and an appropriate response is made. It might be assumed that adding noise to a stimulus, or to the neural systems involved in its processing, would interfere with the decision process. But it has been suggested that adding an optimal amount of noise can, under appropriate conditions, enhance the quality of subthreshold signals in nonlinear systems, a phenomenon known as stochastic resonance. Here we asked whether perceptual decisions obey these stochastic resonance principles by adding noise directly to the visual cortex using transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) while participants judged the direction of motion in foveally presented random-dot motion arrays. Consistent with the stochastic resonance account, we found that adding tRNS bilaterally to visual cortex enhanced decision-making when stimuli were just below, but not well below or above, perceptual threshold. We modelled the data under a drift diffusion framework to isolate the specific components of the multi-stage decision process that were influenced by the addition of neural noise. This modelling showed that tRNS increased drift rate, which indexes the rate of evidence accumulation, but had no effect on bound separation or non-decision time. These results were specific to bilateral stimulation of visual cortex; control experiments involving unilateral stimulation of left and right visual areas showed no influence of random noise stimulation. Our study is the first to provide causal evidence that perceptual decision-making is susceptible to a stochastic resonance effect induced by tRNS, and that this effect arises from selective enhancement of the rate of evidence accumulation for sub-threshold sensory events.

[1]  W. Newsome,et al.  Neural basis of a perceptual decision in the parietal cortex (area LIP) of the rhesus monkey. , 2001, Journal of neurophysiology.

[2]  Peter Hänggi,et al.  Stochastic resonance in biology. How noise can enhance detection of weak signals and help improve biological information processing. , 2002, Chemphyschem : a European journal of chemical physics and physical chemistry.

[3]  L. Tsimring Noise in biology , 2014, Reports on progress in physics. Physical Society.

[4]  Géza Gergely Ambrus,et al.  Cutaneous perception thresholds of electrical stimulation methods: Comparison of tDCS and tRNS , 2010, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[5]  Thomas V. Wiecki,et al.  HDDM: Hierarchical Bayesian estimation of the Drift-Diffusion Model in Python , 2013, Front. Neuroinform..

[6]  L. Pinneo On noise in the nervous system. , 1966, Psychological review.

[7]  Frank Moss,et al.  Noise enhancement of information transfer in crayfish mechanoreceptors by stochastic resonance , 1993, Nature.

[8]  Thomas T. Imhoff,et al.  Noise-enhanced tactile sensation , 1996, Nature.

[9]  Fan-Gang Zeng,et al.  Human hearing enhanced by noise 1 1 Published on the World Wide Web on 23 May 2000. , 2000, Brain Research.

[10]  J. Maunsell,et al.  Responses of neurons in the parietal and temporal visual pathways during a motion task , 1994, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[11]  Geraint Rees,et al.  Motion area V5/MT+ response to global motion in the absence of V1 resembles early visual cortex , 2014, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[12]  Gregoire Nicolis,et al.  Stochastic resonance , 2007, Scholarpedia.

[13]  C. Miniussi,et al.  Random Noise Stimulation Improves Neuroplasticity in Perceptual Learning , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[14]  Geraint Rees,et al.  Stochastic Resonance Effects Reveal the Neural Mechanisms of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[15]  Francesca Grassi,et al.  Noise Enhances Action Potential Generation in Mouse Sensory Neurons via Stochastic Resonance , 2016, PloS one.

[16]  Jochen Braun,et al.  Attractors and noise: Twin drivers of decisions and multistability , 2010, NeuroImage.

[17]  Bingni W. Brunton,et al.  Rats and Humans Can Optimally Accumulate Evidence for Decision-Making , 2013, Science.

[18]  N. Wenderoth,et al.  A technical guide to tDCS, and related non-invasive brain stimulation tools , 2016, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[19]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  A general mechanism for perceptual decision-making in the human brain , 2004, Nature.

[20]  Justin A. Harris,et al.  Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews Modelling Non-invasive Brain Stimulation in Cognitive Neuroscience , 2022 .

[21]  D. Burr,et al.  Spatiotopic selectivity of BOLD responses to visual motion in human area MT , 2007, Nature Neuroscience.

[22]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  The Diffusion Decision Model: Theory and Data for Two-Choice Decision Tasks , 2008, Neural Computation.

[23]  Wiesenfeld,et al.  Stochastic resonance on a circle. , 1994, Physical review letters.

[24]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  A Theory of Memory Retrieval. , 1978 .

[25]  W. Newsome,et al.  A selective impairment of motion perception following lesions of the middle temporal visual area (MT) , 1988, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[26]  J. Movshon,et al.  The analysis of visual motion: a comparison of neuronal and psychophysical performance , 1992, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[27]  T. Nef,et al.  Cathodal HD-tDCS on the right V5 improves motion perception in humans , 2015, Front. Behav. Neurosci..

[28]  Nicole Wenderoth,et al.  Transcranial Random Noise Stimulation of Visual Cortex: Stochastic Resonance Enhances Central Mechanisms of Perception , 2016, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[29]  Frank Huethe,et al.  Improved Sensorimotor Performance via Stochastic Resonance , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[30]  B. Bromm,et al.  Die Natrium-Gleichrichtung der unterschwellig erregten Membran in der quantitativen Formulierung der Ionentheorie , 1968, Pflügers Archiv.

[31]  Derek Abbott,et al.  What Is Stochastic Resonance? Definitions, Misconceptions, Debates, and Its Relevance to Biology , 2009, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[32]  Preston P. Thakral,et al.  Disruption of MT impairs motion processing , 2011, Neuroscience Letters.

[33]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  Sequential Sampling Models in Cognitive Neuroscience: Advantages, Applications, and Extensions. , 2016, Annual review of psychology.

[34]  J. Gold,et al.  The neural basis of decision making. , 2007, Annual review of neuroscience.

[35]  K. H. Britten,et al.  Neuronal correlates of a perceptual decision , 1989, Nature.

[36]  P. Fromherz,et al.  Extracellular stimulation of mammalian neurons through repetitive activation of Na+ channels by weak capacitive currents on a silicon chip. , 2008, Journal of neurophysiology.

[37]  J Overbaugh,et al.  Lymphokines modulate the growth and survival of thymic tumor cells containing a novel feline leukemia virus/Notch2 variant. , 1999, Veterinary immunology and immunopathology.

[38]  W. Newsome,et al.  Microstimulation in visual area MT: effects on direction discrimination performance , 1992, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[39]  Nicolas J. Kerscher,et al.  Noise‐improved signal detection in cat primary visual cortex via a well‐balanced stochastic resonance‐like procedure , 2007, The European journal of neuroscience.

[40]  G. Davis,et al.  Low endogenous neural noise in autism , 2015, Autism : the international journal of research and practice.

[41]  Gyula Kovács,et al.  Direct current stimulation over MT+/V5 modulates motion aftereffect in humans , 2004, Neuroreport.

[42]  Matthew T. Kaufman,et al.  Cognitive neuroscience: Sensory noise drives bad decisions , 2013, Nature.

[43]  Axel Thielscher,et al.  Field modeling for transcranial magnetic stimulation: A useful tool to understand the physiological effects of TMS? , 2015, 2015 37th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).

[44]  Rafael Doti,et al.  Ubiquitous Crossmodal Stochastic Resonance in Humans: Auditory Noise Facilitates Tactile, Visual and Proprioceptive Sensations , 2008, PloS one.

[45]  B. Krekelberg,et al.  Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation Attenuates Visual Motion Adaptation , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[46]  E. Manjarrez,et al.  Noise Improves Visual Motion Discrimination via a Stochastic Resonance-Like Phenomenon , 2016, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[47]  L. M. Ward,et al.  Stochastic resonance and sensory information processing: a tutorial and review of application , 2004, Clinical Neurophysiology.