Convince me or commit me? Avoid the cognitive trap induced by Non-Human Actors in early stages of NPD.

Akrich, Callon & Latour's concept of interessement has been broadly used in NPD. A gap in this theoretical stream of research remains in the difference between human actors' commitment and convincement. The first concerns the enrolment of competent allies while the second concerns arousing top managers' approbation. To address this gap, our qualitative research takes place at SAFRAN, a corporate conglomerate of highly specialised companies. We take the focus of non-human actors (NHA) involved in early stages of NPD analysing 28 NHA of 5 different representational media in 4 different contexts. To characterise NHAs we review the literature on artefacts made within NPD and identify two utmost types (A and B). We find that NHAs which match type A artefacts do better at convincing in prospect of an entry gate to development and that NHAs which match type B artefacts do better at committing in the ideation process. The difficulty for managers is that type A or type B artefacts cannot be recognised according to their representational medium. The consequence is a misunderstanding: some NHA which match type B artefacts create no interessement because type A artefacts were expected, introducing the risk of missing an innovation opportunity. However their failure may not be definitive as managers have the ability to switch from convincement logic to commitment logic. This change in interaction is more probable to happen in informal meetings than in distant artefacts review. Some NHA take advantage of their A-B artefact ambiguity, human actors interact with them by alternating logics, inducing richer decisionmaking and ideation. We conclude that if managers were aware of the two types of artefacts they could adapt their attitude accordingly and take better decisions. We suggest that managers favour artefacts presentations in informal meetings to favour switching between convincement and commitment logics and avoid the cognitive trap.

[1]  Karl-Heinz Leitner,et al.  The Dynamics and Functions of Self-Organization in the Fuzzy Front End: Empirical Evidence from the Austrian Semiconductor Industry , 2008 .

[2]  H. Rheinberger Toward a History of Epistemic Things: Synthesizing Proteins in the Test Tube , 1997 .

[3]  Armand Hutchel,et al.  Rational modelling in understanding and aiding human decision-making: About two case studies , 1986 .

[4]  Susan Albers Mohrman,et al.  Handbook of Collaborative Management Research , 2008 .

[5]  Bruno Latour,et al.  THE KEY TO SUCCESS IN INNOVATION PART I: THE ART OF INTERESSEMENT , 2002 .

[6]  M. Hoegl,et al.  When do we really need interpersonal trust in globally dispersed new product development teams , 2012 .

[7]  Charles Hill,et al.  What do Prototypes Prototype , 1997 .

[8]  Marko Kohtamaki,et al.  Trust and Innovation: From Spin-Off Idea to Stock Exchange , 2004 .

[9]  David J. Moorhouse,et al.  Detailed Definitions and Guidance for Application of Technology Readiness Levels , 2002 .

[10]  Andrew H. Van de Ven,et al.  Learning the Innovation Journey: Order out of Chaos? , 1996 .

[11]  Wiebe E. Bijker,et al.  Science in action : how to follow scientists and engineers through society , 1989 .

[12]  S. Swailes Goals, Creativity and Achievement: Commitment in Contemporary Organizations , 2000 .

[13]  Jane Fulton Suri,et al.  Experience prototyping , 2000, DIS '00.

[14]  Susan Leigh Star,et al.  Institutional Ecology, `Translations' and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39 , 1989 .

[15]  Blanche Segrestin,et al.  Sustainable development through innovative design: lessons from the KCP method experimented with an automotive firm , 2009 .

[16]  John K. Christiansen,et al.  Making Decisions on Innovation: Meetings or Networks? , 2007 .

[17]  Petra M. Bosch-Sijtsema,et al.  Cooperative Innovation Projects: Capabilities and Governance Mechanisms* , 2009 .

[18]  B. Latour Science in action : how to follow scientists and engineers through society , 1989 .

[19]  Bart van Looy,et al.  Managing the Co-Operation–Competition Dilemma in R&D Alliances: A Multiple Case Study in the Advanced Materials Industry , 2007 .

[20]  John C. Mankins,et al.  Technology readiness assessments: A retrospective , 2009 .

[21]  A. Graesser,et al.  Anomalous Information Triggers Questions When Adults Solve Quantitative Problems and Comprehend Stories. , 1993 .

[22]  B. Nooteboom,et al.  Effects of trust and governance on relational risk. , 1997 .

[23]  Pieter E. Vermaas,et al.  Technical Functions: On the Use and Design of Artefacts , 2010 .

[24]  Marine Agogué,et al.  A new methodology for advanced engineering design: Lessons from experimenting C-K Theory driven tools , 2012 .

[25]  T. Fujimoto,et al.  The Effect of “ Front-Loading ” Problem-Solving on Product Development Performance , 2000 .

[26]  Ursula Weisenfeld Engagement in Innovation Management: Perceptions and Interests in the GM Debate1 , 2003 .

[27]  Abideen Tetlay,et al.  Determining the Lines of System Maturity, System Readiness and Capability Readiness in the System Development Lifecycle. , 2009 .

[28]  J. De la Torre,et al.  What Makes Executives Trust Each Other? The Determinants of the Willingness to Rely on Trust in Business Partnerships , 2007 .

[29]  Marine Agogué,et al.  An introduction to innovative design - Elements and applications of C-K theory , 2014 .

[30]  B. Segrestin Partnering to explore: The Renault–Nissan Alliance as a forerunner of new cooperative patterns , 2005 .

[31]  Ludwig Bstieler,et al.  Trust Formation in Collaborative New Product Development , 2006 .

[32]  Stefan H. Thomke,et al.  Experimentation Matters: Unlocking the Potential of New Technologies for Innovation , 2003 .

[33]  Armand Hatchuel,et al.  Collaborating for Management Research: From Action Research to Intervention Research in Management , 2008 .

[34]  Kirsimarja Blomqvist,et al.  Collaboration capability a focal concept in knowledge creation and collaborative innovation in networks , 2006 .

[35]  R. Rothwell Successful industrial innovation: critical factors for the 1990s , 1992 .

[36]  Armand Hatchuel,et al.  Design Theory and Collective Creativity: A Theoretical Framework to Evaluate KCP Process , 2009 .

[37]  M. Magnusson,et al.  Where Do Good Innovation Ideas Come From? Exploring the Influence of Network Connectivity on Innovation Idea Quality , 2009 .

[38]  Marine Agogué,et al.  RETHINKING THE ROLE OF INTERMEDIARIES AS AN ARCHITECT OF COLLECTIVE EXPLORATION AND CREATION OF KNOWLEDGE IN OPEN INNOVATION , 2013 .

[39]  U. Daellenbach,et al.  Commitment to Innovation: The Impact of Top Management Team Characteristics , 1999 .

[40]  Francis Bidault,et al.  Trust and Creativity: Understanding the Role of Trust in Creativity-Oriented Joint Developments , 2009 .

[41]  Ozgur Eris,et al.  ASKING GENERATIVE DESIGN QUESTIONS: A FUNDAMENTAL COGNITIVE MECHANISM IN DESIGN THINKING , 2003 .

[42]  B. Latour,et al.  The Key To Success In Innovation Part Ii: The Art Of Choosing Good Spokespersons , 2002 .

[43]  Benoit Weil,et al.  Waiting games: innovation impasses in situations of high uncertainty , 2012, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[44]  Thomas Gillier,et al.  Exploring Over: The Presumed Identity of Emerging Technology , 2011 .

[45]  Brian Sauser,et al.  A Systems Approach to Expanding the Technology Readiness Level within Defense Acquisition , 2008 .

[46]  Ming-Huei Chen,et al.  Social Networks and a New Venture's Innovative Capability: The Role of Trust within Entrepreneurial Teams , 2008 .

[47]  Marine Agogué,et al.  Stepping out of the zone of territorial protection enables open innovation collaboration , 2013 .

[48]  Wai-sum Siu,et al.  Network Strategies of Small Chinese High-Technology Firms: A Qualitative Study , 2007 .

[49]  Todd C. Kelley,et al.  The Art of Innovation: Lessons in Creativity from IDEO, America's Leading Design Firm , 2001 .

[50]  Thomas Gillier,et al.  Managing Innovation Fields in a Cross‐Industry Exploratory Partnership with C–K Design Theory* , 2010 .

[51]  Akin Kazakçi,et al.  The generation of common purpose in innovation partnerships: a design perspective , 2012 .

[52]  John K. Christiansen,et al.  Actors and structure in is projects: what makes implementation happen? , 1993 .

[53]  Pedro A. Szekely User Interface Prototyping: Tools and Techniques , 1994, ICSE Workshop on SE-HCI.