Patient Factors That Influence Decision Making: Randomization Versus Observational Nonoperative Versus Observational Operative Treatment for Adult Symptomatic Lumbar Scoliosis

Study Design. A prospective study with randomized and observational cohorts. Objective. The aim of this study was to determine baseline variables affecting adult symptomatic lumbar scoliosis (ASLS) decision making to participate in randomization (RAND), observational nonsurgical (OBS-NS), or observational surgical (OBS-S) cohorts. Summary of Background Data. Multiple factors play a key role in a patient's decision to be randomized or to choose an OBS-NS or OBS-S course for ASLS. Studies evaluating these factors are limited. Methods. Eligible candidates (patients with ASLS and no prior spinal fusion deformity surgery) from 9 centers participated in a RAND, OBS-NS, or OBS-S cohort study. Baseline variables (demographics, socioeconomics, patient-reported outcomes [PROs], Functional Treadmill Test, radiographs) were analyzed. Results. Two hundred ninety-five patients were enrolled: 67 RAND, 115 OBS-NS, 113 OBS-S. Subanalysis of older patients (60–80 years) found 54% of OBS-NS had college degrees compared with 82% of RAND and 71% of OBS-S (P = 0.010). Patients deciding to be part of a RAND cohort have similar clinical characteristics to the OBS-S cohort. OBS-S had more symptomatic spinal stenosis (57% vs. 39%, P = 0.029) and worse scores than OBS-NS on the basis of PROs (Back Pain Numerical Rating Scale [NRS 6.3 vs. 5.5, P = 0.007]; Scoliosis Research Society [SRS] Pain [2.8 vs. 3.0, P = 0.018], Function [3.1 vs. 3.4, P = 0.019] and Self-Image [2.7 vs. 3.1, P = 0.002]; Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) [36.9 vs. 31.8, P = 0.029]; post-Treadmill back [5.8 vs. 4.4, P = 0.002] and leg [4.3 vs. 3.1, P = 0.037] pain NRS and larger lumbar coronal Cobb angles (56.5 degrees vs. 48.8 degrees, P < 0.001). RAND had more baseline motor deficits (10.4% vs. 1.7%, P = 0.036) and worse scores than OBS-NS on the basis of ODI (38.8 vs. 31.8, P = 0.006), SRS Function [3.1 vs. 3.4, P = 0.034], and Self-Image [2.7 vs. 3.1, P = 0.007]. Conclusion. Patients with worse PROs, more back pain, more back and leg pain with ambulation, and larger lumbar Cobb angles are more inclined to select surgical over nonsurgical management. Level of Evidence: 1

[1]  K. Bridwell,et al.  The Minimum Clinically Important Difference in SRS-22R Total Score, Appearance, Activity and Pain Domains After Surgical Treatment of Adult Spinal Deformity , 2015, Spine.

[2]  Kai-Ming G. Fu,et al.  Clinical and radiographic parameters that distinguish between the best and worst outcomes of scoliosis surgery for adults , 2013, European Spine Journal.

[3]  J. Korzenik,et al.  Barriers to enrollment in inflammatory bowel disease randomized controlled trials: An investigation of patient perspectives , 2012, Inflammatory bowel diseases.

[4]  P. Huddleston.  Surgical Compared with Nonoperative Treatment for Lumbar Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: Four-year Results in the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT) Randomized and Observational Cohorts , 2010 .

[5]  O. Boachie-Adjei,et al.  Pain and Disability Determine Treatment Modality for Older Patients With Adult Scoliosis, While Deformity Guides Treatment for Younger Patients , 2009, Spine.

[6]  V. Deviren,et al.  The Factors That Play a Role in the Decision-Making Process of Adult Deformity Patients , 2009, Spine.

[7]  L. Lenke,et al.  Is the SRS-22 Instrument Responsive to Change in Adult Scoliosis Patients Having Primary Spinal Deformity Surgery? , 2007, Spine.

[8]  K. Bridwell,et al.  The Problems and Limitations of Applying Evidence-Based Medicine to Primary Surgical Treatment of Adult Spinal Deformity , 2007, Spine.

[9]  L. Lenke,et al.  The Selection of Operative Versus Nonoperative Treatment in Patients With Adult Scoliosis , 2007, Spine.

[10]  K. Bridwell,et al.  A Clinical Impact Classification of Scoliosis in the Adult , 2006, Spine.

[11]  K. Bridwell,et al.  Nonsurgical Resource Utilization in Adult Spinal Deformity , 2006, Spine.

[12]  William Horton,et al.  Correlation of Radiographic Parameters and Clinical Symptoms in Adult Scoliosis , 2005, Spine.

[13]  L. Lenke,et al.  Long Adult Deformity Fusions to L5 and the Sacrum A Matched Cohort Analysis , 2004, Spine.

[14]  John R. Johnson,et al.  Perioperative complications of posterior lumbar decompression and arthrodesis in older adults. , 2003, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[15]  F. Nieman,et al.  Determinants of patient participation in clinical studies requiring informed consent: why patients enter a clinical trial. , 1998, Patient education and counseling.