Privacy concerns, too busy, or just not interested: using doorstep concerns to predict survey nonresponse

Using newly available paradata, this article explores the use of “doorstep concerns” to predict interim and final refusals in the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS). Using ten weeks of automated contact history records, we analyze privacy and burden concerns but also examine other verbal and nonverbal interactions recorded by interviewers during contact with households. We conduct a multi-model multinomial logit analysis starting with a social environmental model (e.g., region, urbanicity), followed by the addition of process variables (e.g., number of noncontacts, mode of contact), and finally include the new household-level doorstep concerns (e.g., privacy concerns, too busy). The study found that the doorstep concerns greatly improved models predicting nonresponse relative to models including only environmental variables and basic contact history measures. Privacy concerns were significant in predicting interim refusals, but not final refusals. The effects of burden differed depending upon the particular doorstep concern used as an indicator of burden.

[1]  M. Couper Survey introductions and data quality , 1997 .

[2]  Robert M. Groves,et al.  Responsive design for household surveys: tools for actively controlling survey errors and costs , 2006 .

[3]  R. Groves,et al.  INTERVIEWER TRAINING TO INCREASE SURVEY PARTICIPATION , 2002 .

[4]  R. Groves,et al.  The Role of Topic Interest in Survey Participation Decisions , 2004 .

[5]  T. Mayer,et al.  INTERVIEWER REFUSAL AVERSION TRAINING TO INCREASE SURVEY PARTICIPATION 1 , 2001 .

[6]  DOUGLAS W. MAYNARD,et al.  Keeping the Gate , 1997 .

[7]  T. Johnson,et al.  Using Community-Level Correlates to Evaluate Nonresponse Effects in a Telephone Survey , 2006 .

[8]  Roger Tourangeau,et al.  Experiments in Producing Nonresponse Bias , 2006 .

[9]  E. Singer,et al.  Leverage-saliency theory of survey participation: description and an illustration. , 2000, Public opinion quarterly.

[10]  E. Ziegel,et al.  Nonresponse In Household Interview Surveys , 1998 .

[11]  Norman M. Bradburn,et al.  DO RESPONDENTS REALLY “MARK ALL THAT APPLY” ON SELF-ADMINISTERED QUESTIONS? , 1994 .

[12]  Stanley Presser,et al.  Privacy, Confidentiality, and Respondent Burden as Factors in Telephone Survey Nonresponse , 2007 .

[13]  R. Groves,et al.  A Theory-Guided Interviewer Training Protocol Regarding Survey Participation , 2001 .

[14]  Barbara J. Stussman,et al.  Partials and Break-offs in the National Health Interview Survey, 2002 1 , 2003 .

[15]  Michael Witt,et al.  SUDAAN language manual, release 9.0: , 2003 .

[16]  Susan Purdon,et al.  Can you hear me knocking? and investigation into the impact of interviewers on survey response rates , 1997 .

[17]  Patrick Sturgis,et al.  The Scope for Reducing Refusals in Household Surveys: An Investigation Based on Transcripts of tape-recorded Doorstep Interactions , 1998 .