Ligand-Receptor Affinities Computed by an Adapted Linear Interaction Model for Continuum Electrostatics and by Protein Conformational Averaging

Accurate calculations of free energies involved in small-molecule binding to a receptor are challenging. Interactions between ligand, receptor, and solvent molecules have to be described precisely, and a large number of conformational microstates has to be sampled, particularly for ligand binding to a flexible protein. Linear interaction energy models are computationally efficient methods that have found considerable success in the prediction of binding free energies. Here, we parametrize a linear interaction model for implicit solvation with coefficients adapted by ligand and binding site relative polarities in order to predict ligand binding free energies. Results obtained for a diverse series of ligands suggest that the model has good predictive power and transferability. We also apply implicit ligand theory and propose approximations to average contributions of multiple ligand-receptor poses built from a protein conformational ensemble and find that exponential averages require proper energy discrimination between plausible binding poses and false-positives (i.e., decoys). The linear interaction model and the averaging procedures presented can be applied independently of each other and of the method used to obtain the receptor structural representation.

[1]  Peter Kolb,et al.  Discovery of kinase inhibitors by high-throughput docking and scoring based on a transferable linear interaction energy model. , 2008, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[2]  Daniel M Zuckerman,et al.  Equilibrium sampling in biomolecular simulations. , 2011, Annual review of biophysics.

[3]  B. Shoichet,et al.  Decoys for docking. , 2005, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[4]  T. Straatsma,et al.  THE MISSING TERM IN EFFECTIVE PAIR POTENTIALS , 1987 .

[5]  Emilio Gallicchio,et al.  Advances in all atom sampling methods for modeling protein-ligand binding affinities. , 2011, Current opinion in structural biology.

[6]  J M Blaney,et al.  A geometric approach to macromolecule-ligand interactions. , 1982, Journal of molecular biology.

[7]  Alexander D. MacKerell,et al.  CHARMM general force field: A force field for drug‐like molecules compatible with the CHARMM all‐atom additive biological force fields , 2009, J. Comput. Chem..

[8]  Chris Oostenbrink,et al.  Are Automated Molecular Dynamics Simulations and Binding Free Energy Calculations Realistic Tools in Lead Optimization? An Evaluation of the Linear Interaction Energy (LIE) Method , 2006, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[9]  Harianto Tjong,et al.  GBr(6): a parameterization-free, accurate, analytical generalized born method. , 2007, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[10]  Jens Carlsson,et al.  Continuum solvation models in the linear interaction energy method. , 2006, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[11]  Richard A. Lewis,et al.  Lessons in molecular recognition: the effects of ligand and protein flexibility on molecular docking accuracy. , 2004, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[12]  Amedeo Caflisch,et al.  Efficient evaluation of binding free energy using continuum electrostatics solvation. , 2004, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[13]  Alexander D. MacKerell,et al.  Computational evaluation of protein-small molecule binding. , 2009, Current opinion in structural biology.

[14]  Holger Gohlke,et al.  Target flexibility: an emerging consideration in drug discovery and design. , 2008, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[15]  L. Kay,et al.  Flexibility and ligand exchange in a buried cavity mutant of T4 lysozyme studied by multinuclear NMR. , 2000, Biochemistry.

[16]  R. Levy,et al.  Enthalpy−Entropy and Cavity Decomposition of Alkane Hydration Free Energies: Numerical Results and Implications for Theories of Hydrophobic Solvation , 2000 .

[17]  W. L. Jorgensen,et al.  Binding affinities for sulfonamide inhibitors with human thrombin using Monte Carlo simulations with a linear response method. , 1997, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[18]  Jeffrey Skolnick,et al.  Assessment of programs for ligand binding affinity prediction , 2008, J. Comput. Chem..

[19]  J. Aqvist,et al.  A new method for predicting binding affinity in computer-aided drug design. , 1994, Protein engineering.

[20]  D. Case,et al.  Exploring protein native states and large‐scale conformational changes with a modified generalized born model , 2004, Proteins.

[21]  Chris Morley,et al.  Open Babel: An open chemical toolbox , 2011, J. Cheminformatics.

[22]  Junmei Wang,et al.  How well does a restrained electrostatic potential (RESP) model perform in calculating conformational energies of organic and biological molecules? , 2000, J. Comput. Chem..

[23]  Wei Chen,et al.  Modeling Protein-Ligand Binding by Mining Minima. , 2010, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[24]  W. L. Jorgensen The Many Roles of Computation in Drug Discovery , 2004, Science.

[25]  Xavier Barril,et al.  Ensemble Docking from Homology Models. , 2010, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[26]  W. C. Still,et al.  Semianalytical treatment of solvation for molecular mechanics and dynamics , 1990 .

[27]  R Abagyan,et al.  Discovery of antiandrogen activity of nonsteroidal scaffolds of marketed drugs , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[28]  B. L. de Groot,et al.  Predicting free energy changes using structural ensembles. , 2009, Nature methods.

[29]  Emilio Gallicchio,et al.  The Binding Energy Distribution Analysis Method (BEDAM) for the Estimation of Protein-Ligand Binding Affinities. , 2010, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[30]  Somesh D. Sharma,et al.  Managing protein flexibility in docking and its applications. , 2009, Drug discovery today.

[31]  Wilfred F. van Gunsteren,et al.  Basic ingredients of free energy calculations: A review , 2009, J. Comput. Chem..

[32]  P. Selzer,et al.  Fast calculation of molecular polar surface area as a sum of fragment-based contributions and its application to the prediction of drug transport properties. , 2000, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[33]  Wei Yang,et al.  The Effects of Computational Modeling Errors on the Estimation of Statistical Mechanical Variables. , 2012, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[34]  B. Roux,et al.  Computations of standard binding free energies with molecular dynamics simulations. , 2009, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[35]  G. M. Arantes,et al.  Specific parametrisation of a hybrid potential to simulate reactions in phosphatases. , 2006, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[36]  B. Matthews,et al.  A model binding site for testing scoring functions in molecular docking. , 2002, Journal of molecular biology.

[37]  Arthur J. Olson,et al.  AutoDock Vina: Improving the speed and accuracy of docking with a new scoring function, efficient optimization, and multithreading , 2009, J. Comput. Chem..

[38]  Ruhong Zhou,et al.  New Linear Interaction Method for Binding Affinity Calculations Using a Continuum Solvent Model , 2001 .

[39]  Pedro Alexandrino Fernandes,et al.  Protein–ligand docking: Current status and future challenges , 2006, Proteins.

[40]  B. Matthews,et al.  A cavity-containing mutant of T4 lysozyme is stabilized by buried benzene , 1993, Nature.

[41]  Berk Hess,et al.  LINCS: A linear constraint solver for molecular simulations , 1997, J. Comput. Chem..

[42]  Rational inhibitor design and iterative screening in the identification of selective plasmodial cyclin dependent kinase inhibitors. , 2005, Combinatorial chemistry & high throughput screening.

[43]  M. Parrinello,et al.  Canonical sampling through velocity rescaling. , 2007, The Journal of chemical physics.

[44]  David L Mobley,et al.  Predicting ligand binding affinity with alchemical free energy methods in a polar model binding site. , 2009, Journal of molecular biology.

[45]  David S. Goodsell,et al.  A semiempirical free energy force field with charge‐based desolvation , 2007, J. Comput. Chem..

[46]  T. J. Breen,et al.  Biostatistical Analysis (2nd ed.). , 1986 .

[47]  David Baker,et al.  Role of the Biomolecular Energy Gap in Protein Design, Structure, and Evolution , 2012, Cell.

[48]  Guilherme Menegon Arantes,et al.  Flexibility and inhibitor binding in cdc25 phosphatases , 2010, Proteins.

[49]  J. Åqvist,et al.  Ligand binding affinities from MD simulations. , 2002, Accounts of chemical research.

[50]  M. Karplus,et al.  Solution conformations and thermodynamics of structured peptides: molecular dynamics simulation with an implicit solvation model. , 1998, Journal of molecular biology.

[51]  J Tirado-Rives,et al.  Estimation of binding affinities for HEPT and nevirapine analogues with HIV-1 reverse transcriptase via Monte Carlo simulations. , 2001, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[52]  Emilio Gallicchio,et al.  Linear Interaction Energy (LIE) Models for Ligand Binding in Implicit Solvent:  Theory and Application to the Binding of NNRTIs to HIV-1 Reverse Transcriptase. , 2007, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[53]  C. Tanford,et al.  Empirical correlation between hydrophobic free energy and aqueous cavity surface area. , 1974, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[54]  Johan Åqvist,et al.  Binding affinity prediction with different force fields: Examination of the linear interaction energy method , 2004, J. Comput. Chem..

[55]  Michael R Shirts,et al.  Parallelized-over-parts computation of absolute binding free energy with docking and molecular dynamics. , 2006, The Journal of chemical physics.

[56]  Paulo Augusto Netz,et al.  Linear interaction energy (LIE) method in lead discovery and optimization. , 2008, Current drug targets.

[57]  Johan Åqvist,et al.  Ligand binding affinity prediction by linear interaction energy methods , 1998, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[58]  Eamonn F. Healy,et al.  Development and use of quantum mechanical molecular models. 76. AM1: a new general purpose quantum mechanical molecular model , 1985 .

[59]  K. Dill,et al.  Predicting absolute ligand binding free energies to a simple model site. , 2007, Journal of molecular biology.

[60]  M. Parrinello,et al.  Polymorphic transitions in single crystals: A new molecular dynamics method , 1981 .

[61]  W. L. Jorgensen,et al.  AN EXTENDED LINEAR RESPONSE METHOD FOR DETERMINING FREE ENERGIES OF HYDRATION , 1995 .

[62]  Arieh Warshel,et al.  Investigation of the free energy functions for electron transfer reactions , 1990 .

[63]  N. P. Todorov,et al.  Assessment of multiple binding modes in ligand-protein docking. , 2004, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[64]  Ying Ding,et al.  General library-based Monte Carlo technique enables equilibrium sampling of semi-atomistic protein models. , 2009, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[65]  Donald G. Truhlar,et al.  Accurate dipole moments from Hartree-Fock calculations by means of class IV charges , 1999 .

[66]  David D. L. Minh Implicit ligand theory: rigorous binding free energies and thermodynamic expectations from molecular docking. , 2012, The Journal of chemical physics.

[67]  M Gerstein,et al.  The geometry of the ribosomal polypeptide exit tunnel. , 2006, Journal of molecular biology.

[68]  M G Ford,et al.  Binding constants of neuraminidase inhibitors: An investigation of the linear interaction energy method. , 1999, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[69]  R. Abagyan,et al.  Flexible ligand docking to multiple receptor conformations: a practical alternative. , 2008, Current opinion in structural biology.

[70]  Thomas M Frimurer,et al.  Ligand-induced conformational changes: improved predictions of ligand binding conformations and affinities. , 2003, Biophysical journal.

[71]  Claudio N. Cavasotto,et al.  Protein flexibility in ligand docking and virtual screening to protein kinases. , 2004, Journal of molecular biology.

[72]  T. Darden,et al.  Particle mesh Ewald: An N⋅log(N) method for Ewald sums in large systems , 1993 .

[73]  Dariusz Plewczynski,et al.  Can we trust docking results? Evaluation of seven commonly used programs on PDBbind database , 2011, J. Comput. Chem..

[74]  Heather A Carlson,et al.  Small molecule inhibitors of the MDM2-p53 interaction discovered by ensemble-based receptor models. , 2007, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[75]  T. Brinck,et al.  "Adapted Linear Interaction Energy": A Structure-Based LIE Parametrization for Fast Prediction of Protein-Ligand Affinities. , 2013, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[76]  Christopher R. Corbeil,et al.  Towards the development of universal, fast and highly accurate docking/scoring methods: a long way to go , 2008, British journal of pharmacology.

[77]  Tom L. Blundell,et al.  Does a More Precise Chemical Description of Protein–Ligand Complexes Lead to More Accurate Prediction of Binding Affinity? , 2014, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[78]  K. Dill,et al.  On the use of orientational restraints and symmetry corrections in alchemical free energy calculations. , 2006, The Journal of chemical physics.

[79]  J. Bajorath,et al.  Docking and scoring in virtual screening for drug discovery: methods and applications , 2004, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[80]  Gerhard Klebe,et al.  Relibase: design and development of a database for comprehensive analysis of protein-ligand interactions. , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.

[81]  W. L. Jorgensen,et al.  Development and Testing of the OPLS All-Atom Force Field on Conformational Energetics and Properties of Organic Liquids , 1996 .

[82]  Bert L. de Groot,et al.  Conformational Transitions upon Ligand Binding: Holo-Structure Prediction from Apo Conformations , 2010, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[83]  M. Gilson,et al.  Calculation of protein-ligand binding affinities. , 2007, Annual review of biophysics and biomolecular structure.

[84]  Peter M. Kasson,et al.  GROMACS 4.5: a high-throughput and highly parallel open source molecular simulation toolkit , 2013, Bioinform..

[85]  P. Kollman,et al.  A Second Generation Force Field for the Simulation of Proteins, Nucleic Acids, and Organic Molecules , 1995 .

[86]  David L Mobley,et al.  Alchemical free energy methods for drug discovery: progress and challenges. , 2011, Current opinion in structural biology.

[87]  C Sander,et al.  The use of position‐specific rotamers in model building by homology , 1995, Proteins.

[88]  J Andrew McCammon,et al.  Molecular docking of balanol to dynamics snapshots of protein kinase A , 2005, Proteins.