Closed-loop optimization of fast-charging protocols for batteries with machine learning

Simultaneously optimizing many design parameters in time-consuming experiments causes bottlenecks in a broad range of scientific and engineering disciplines 1 , 2 . One such example is process and control optimization for lithium-ion batteries during materials selection, cell manufacturing and operation. A typical objective is to maximize battery lifetime; however, conducting even a single experiment to evaluate lifetime can take months to years 3 – 5 . Furthermore, both large parameter spaces and high sampling variability 3 , 6 , 7 necessitate a large number of experiments. Hence, the key challenge is to reduce both the number and the duration of the experiments required. Here we develop and demonstrate a machine learning methodology  to efficiently optimize a parameter space specifying the current and voltage profiles of six-step, ten-minute fast-charging protocols for maximizing battery cycle life, which can alleviate range anxiety for electric-vehicle users 8 , 9 . We combine two key elements to reduce the optimization cost: an early-prediction model 5 , which reduces the time per experiment by predicting the final cycle life using data from the first few cycles, and a Bayesian optimization algorithm 10 , 11 , which reduces the number of experiments by balancing exploration and exploitation to efficiently probe the parameter space of charging protocols. Using this methodology, we rapidly identify high-cycle-life charging protocols among 224 candidates in 16 days (compared with over 500 days using exhaustive search without early prediction), and subsequently validate the accuracy and efficiency of our optimization approach. Our closed-loop methodology automatically incorporates feedback from past experiments to inform future decisions and can be generalized to other applications in battery design and, more broadly, other scientific domains that involve time-intensive experiments and multi-dimensional design spaces. A closed-loop machine learning methodology of optimizing fast-charging protocols for lithium-ion batteries can identify high-lifetime charging protocols accurately and efficiently, considerably reducing the experimental time compared to simpler approaches.

[1]  T. Baumhöfer,et al.  Production caused variation in capacity aging trend and correlation to initial cell performance , 2014 .

[2]  Turab Lookman,et al.  Experimental search for high-temperature ferroelectric perovskites guided by two-step machine learning , 2018, Nature Communications.

[3]  Aaron Klein,et al.  Learning Curve Prediction with Bayesian Neural Networks , 2016, ICLR.

[4]  Long Chen,et al.  Maximum Principle Based Algorithms for Deep Learning , 2017, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[5]  Shengbo Zhang The effect of the charging protocol on the cycle life of a Li-ion battery , 2006 .

[6]  Kevin Leyton-Brown,et al.  Sequential Model-Based Optimization for General Algorithm Configuration , 2011, LION.

[7]  Simon F. Schuster,et al.  Lithium-ion cell-to-cell variation during battery electric vehicle operation , 2015 .

[8]  Simon F. Schuster,et al.  Calendar Aging of Lithium-Ion Batteries I. Impact of the Graphite Anode on Capacity Fade , 2016 .

[9]  Marius Bauer,et al.  Fast charging of lithium-ion cells: Identification of aging-minimal current profiles using a design of experiment approach and a mechanistic degradation analysis , 2018, Journal of Energy Storage.

[10]  Klavs F Jensen,et al.  Reconfigurable system for automated optimization of diverse chemical reactions , 2018, Science.

[11]  Nando de Freitas,et al.  Taking the Human Out of the Loop: A Review of Bayesian Optimization , 2016, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[12]  Yi-Hwa Liu,et al.  Search for an optimal multistage charging pattern for lithium-ion batteries using the Taguchi approach , 2009, TENCON 2009 - 2009 IEEE Region 10 Conference.

[13]  Scott J. Moura,et al.  Optimal Experimental Design for Parameterization of an Electrochemical Lithium-Ion Battery Model , 2018 .

[14]  Alán Aspuru-Guzik,et al.  Accelerating the discovery of materials for clean energy in the era of smart automation , 2018, Nature Reviews Materials.

[15]  Claus Daniel,et al.  Prospects for reducing the processing cost of lithium ion batteries , 2015 .

[16]  Kristen A. Severson,et al.  Data-driven prediction of battery cycle life before capacity degradation , 2019, Nature Energy.

[17]  Leroy Cronin,et al.  Controlling an organic synthesis robot with machine learning to search for new reactivity , 2018, Nature.

[18]  Frank Hutter,et al.  Speeding Up Automatic Hyperparameter Optimization of Deep Neural Networks by Extrapolation of Learning Curves , 2015, IJCAI.

[19]  Ken E. Whelan,et al.  The Automation of Science , 2009, Science.

[20]  Adrian E. Roitberg,et al.  Less is more: sampling chemical space with active learning , 2018, The Journal of chemical physics.

[21]  Daniel W. Davies,et al.  Machine learning for molecular and materials science , 2018, Nature.

[22]  Rahul Rao,et al.  Autonomy in materials research: a case study in carbon nanotube growth , 2016 .

[23]  J.H.G. Op het Veld,et al.  Boostcharging Li-ion batteries: A challenging new charging concept , 2005 .

[24]  Xuemei Zhao,et al.  A High Precision Coulometry Study of the SEI Growth in Li/Graphite Cells , 2011 .

[25]  Gisbert Schneider,et al.  Automating drug discovery , 2017, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[26]  Yi-Hwa Liu,et al.  Search for an Optimal Five-Step Charging Pattern for Li-Ion Batteries Using Consecutive Orthogonal Arrays , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion.

[27]  Ameet Talwalkar,et al.  Hyperband: A Novel Bandit-Based Approach to Hyperparameter Optimization , 2016, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[28]  Andreas Jossen,et al.  Charging protocols for lithium-ion batteries and their impact on cycle life—An experimental study with different 18650 high-power cells , 2016 .

[29]  David A. Wetz,et al.  Measurement of anisotropic thermophysical properties of cylindrical Li-ion cells , 2014 .

[30]  Yi Cui,et al.  Challenges and opportunities towards fast-charging battery materials , 2019, Nature Energy.

[31]  Julia Ling,et al.  High-Dimensional Materials and Process Optimization Using Data-Driven Experimental Design with Well-Calibrated Uncertainty Estimates , 2017, Integrating Materials and Manufacturing Innovation.

[32]  H. Zou,et al.  Regularization and variable selection via the elastic net , 2005 .

[33]  Nando de Freitas,et al.  On correlation and budget constraints in model-based bandit optimization with application to automatic machine learning , 2014, AISTATS.

[34]  Stefano Ermon,et al.  Best arm identification in multi-armed bandits with delayed feedback , 2018, AISTATS.

[35]  Chen Li,et al.  Failure statistics for commercial lithium ion batteries: A study of 24 pouch cells , 2017 .

[36]  Richard Barney Carlson,et al.  Enabling fast charging – A battery technology gap assessment , 2017 .