Metal-on-metal bearing wear with different swing phase loads.

There is currently much discussion about the most clinically relevant testing methods for evaluating total hip replacements. This study examined the effect of different swing phase loads, including microseparation, on the wear, friction, and wear particles of metal-on-metal (MOM) hip replacements. MOM hip replacements were tested for 5 million cycles with the use of a hip simulator; prostheses were tested with a low (100-N) and ISO (280-N) swing phase load, and under microseparation conditions. Increasing the swing phase load from 100 to 280 N in the same hip simulator increased the wear of the MOM hip replacements by over tenfold. Introducing microseparation into the gait cycle increased wear further, and stripe wear was observed on the femoral heads, accompanied by corresponding rim damage on the acetabular cups. No significant difference in wear particle size was observed between wear particles produced by low load and microseparation hip simulator conditions. Introducing microseparation into the hip simulator gait cycle increased the wear of MOM prostheses. Joint laxity and separation may lead to increased wear rates of MOM prostheses in vivo. Additionally elevated positive swing phase loads may also increase wear. Variable swing phase load conditions in vivo may contribute to variations in clinical wear rates.

[1]  J. Fisher,et al.  The influence of phospholipid concentration in protein-containing lubricants on the wear of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene in artificial hip joints , 2001, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[2]  A. Unsworth,et al.  The wear of metal-on-metal total hip prostheses measured in a hip simulator , 2001, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[3]  C. Rieker,et al.  Analysis of 118 second-generation metal-on-metal retrieved hip implants. , 1999, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[4]  D. Dowson,et al.  Friction and Lubrication in Cushion Form Bearings for Artificial Hip Joints , 1993, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[5]  J Fisher,et al.  A hip joint simulator study using new and physiologically scratched femoral heads with ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene acetabular cups , 2000, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[6]  D. Zukor,et al.  Size, shape, and composition of wear particles from metal-metal hip simulator testing: effects of alloy and number of loading cycles. , 2003, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[7]  R. Villar,et al.  Dislocation after total hip replacement in relation to metal-on-metal bearing surfaces. , 2003, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[8]  J. Fisher,et al.  Influence of simulator kinematics on the wear of metal-on-metal hip prostheses , 2001, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[9]  J Fisher,et al.  Analysis of retrieved alumina ceramic components from Mittelmeier total hip prostheses. , 1999, Biomaterials.

[10]  F. Chan,et al.  Comparison of Alloys and Designs in a Hip Simulator Study of Metal on Metal Implants , 1996, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[11]  J Fisher,et al.  Long-term wear of HIPed alumina on alumina bearings for THR under microseparation conditions , 2001, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.

[12]  J Fisher,et al.  A hip joint simulator study using simplified loading and motion cycles generating physiological wear paths and rates , 1999, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[13]  J. Fisher,et al.  Quantitative analysis of the wear and wear debris from low and high carbon content cobalt chrome alloys used in metal on metal total hip replacements , 1999, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.

[14]  J. Fisher,et al.  Wear of HIPed and non-HIPed alumina-alumina hip joints under standard and severe simulator testing conditions. , 2001, Biomaterials.

[15]  J. Fisher,et al.  Biological reactions to wear debris in total joint replacement , 2000, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[16]  J Fisher,et al.  Microseparation of the centers of alumina-alumina artificial hip joints during simulator testing produces clinically relevant wear rates and patterns. , 2000, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[17]  J Fisher,et al.  Comparison of the cytotoxicity of clinically relevant cobalt-chromium and alumina ceramic wear particles in vitro. , 2003, Biomaterials.

[18]  M Semlitsch,et al.  Metal-On-Metal Articulation for Artificial Hip Joints: Laboratory Study and Clinical Results , 1996, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.