Artificial neural network-aided image analysis system for cell counting.

BACKGROUND In histological preparations containing debris and synthetic materials, it is difficult to automate cell counting using standard image analysis tools, i.e., systems that rely on boundary contours, histogram thresholding, etc. In an attempt to mimic manual cell recognition, an automated cell counter was constructed using a combination of artificial intelligence and standard image analysis methods. METHODS Artificial neural network (ANN) methods were applied on digitized microscopy fields without pre-ANN feature extraction. A three-layer feed-forward network with extensive weight sharing in the first hidden layer was employed and trained on 1,830 examples using the error back-propagation algorithm on a Power Macintosh 7300/180 desktop computer. The optimal number of hidden neurons was determined and the trained system was validated by comparison with blinded human counts. System performance at 50x and lO0x magnification was evaluated. RESULTS The correlation index at 100x magnification neared person-to-person variability, while 50x magnification was not useful. The system was approximately six times faster than an experienced human. CONCLUSIONS ANN-based automated cell counting in noisy histological preparations is feasible. Consistent histology and computer power are crucial for system performance. The system provides several benefits, such as speed of analysis and consistency, and frees up personnel for other tasks.

[1]  John C. Russ,et al.  The Image Processing Handbook , 2016, Microscopy and Microanalysis.

[2]  P N Furness,et al.  Semiautomatic quantitation of macrophages in human renal biopsy specimens in proteinuric states. , 1997, Journal of clinical pathology.

[3]  T. Flanagan,et al.  24 – Tests for Validating the Safety of Encapsulated Xenografts , 1994 .

[4]  H Kolles,et al.  Data-driven approaches to decision making in automated tumor grading. An example of astrocytoma grading. , 1996, Analytical and quantitative cytology and histology.

[5]  W. Baxt Use of an artificial neural network for the diagnosis of myocardial infarction. , 1991, Annals of internal medicine.

[6]  J V Tu,et al.  Advantages and disadvantages of using artificial neural networks versus logistic regression for predicting medical outcomes. , 1996, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[7]  B L Kuyatt,et al.  Point counting on the Macintosh. A semiautomated image analysis technique. , 1993, Analytical and quantitative cytology and histology.

[8]  R K Brouwer,et al.  Classifying cervical cells using a recurrent neural network by building basins of attraction. , 1995, Analytical and quantitative cytology and histology.

[9]  Kevin Swingler,et al.  Applying neural networks - a practical guide , 1996 .

[10]  Boriana L. Milenova,et al.  Fuzzy and neural approaches in engineering , 1997 .

[11]  P Aebischer,et al.  Macroencapsulation of dopamine-secreting cells by coextrusion with an organic polymer solution. , 1991, Biomaterials.

[12]  G Harauz,et al.  A hierarchical neural network assembly for classification of cervical cells in automated screening. , 1994, Analytical cellular pathology : the journal of the European Society for Analytical Cellular Pathology.

[13]  M Jimbo,et al.  Tumor cell counting using an image analysis program for MIB-1 immunohistochemistry. , 1997, Neurologia medico-chirurgica.

[14]  J R Beck,et al.  Artificial neural networks for medical classification decisions. , 1995, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[15]  Simon Haykin,et al.  Neural Networks: A Comprehensive Foundation , 1998 .

[16]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Learning internal representations by error propagation , 1986 .

[17]  Rafael C. González,et al.  Local Determination of a Moving Contrast Edge , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[18]  P. Tresco,et al.  Hydrogel Applications for Encapsulated Cellular Transplants , 1994 .