Intra-individual gait patterns across different time-scales as revealed by means of a supervised learning model using kernel-based discriminant regression

Objective Traditionally, gait analysis has been centered on the idea of average behavior and normality. On one hand, clinical diagnoses and therapeutic interventions typically assume that average gait patterns remain constant over time. On the other hand, it is well known that all our movements are accompanied by a certain amount of variability, which does not allow us to make two identical steps. The purpose of this study was to examine changes in the intra-individual gait patterns across different time-scales (i.e., tens-of-mins, tens-of-hours). Methods Nine healthy subjects performed 15 gait trials at a self-selected speed on 6 sessions within one day (duration between two subsequent sessions from 10 to 90 mins). For each trial, time-continuous ground reaction forces and lower body joint angles were measured. A supervised learning model using a kernel-based discriminant regression was applied for classifying sessions within individual gait patterns. Results and discussion Discernable characteristics of intra-individual gait patterns could be distinguished between repeated sessions by classification rates of 67.8 ± 8.8% and 86.3 ± 7.9% for the six-session-classification of ground reaction forces and lower body joint angles, respectively. Furthermore, the one-on-one-classification showed that increasing classification rates go along with increasing time durations between two sessions and indicate that changes of gait patterns appear at different time-scales. Conclusion Discernable characteristics between repeated sessions indicate continuous intrinsic changes in intra-individual gait patterns and suggest a predominant role of deterministic processes in human motor control and learning. Natural changes of gait patterns without any externally induced injury or intervention may reflect continuous adaptations of the motor system over several time-scales. Accordingly, the modelling of walking by means of average gait patterns that are assumed to be near constant over time needs to be reconsidered in the context of these findings, especially towards more individualized and situational diagnoses and therapy.

[1]  U. Lindenberger,et al.  Older Adults Show Preserved Equilibrium but Impaired Step Length Control in Motor-Equivalent Stabilization of Gait , 2012, PloS one.

[2]  K M Newell,et al.  Time scales of adaptive behavior and motor learning in the presence of stochastic perturbations. , 2009, Human movement science.

[3]  J. Dingwell,et al.  Separating the effects of age and walking speed on gait variability. , 2008, Gait & posture.

[4]  K. Newell,et al.  Changing complexity in human behavior and physiology through aging and disease , 2002, Neurobiology of Aging.

[5]  T. M. Owings,et al.  Variability of step kinematics in young and older adults. , 2004, Gait & posture.

[6]  L. Liebovitch,et al.  "Fractal dynamics of human gait: stability of long-range correlations in stride interval fluctuations". , 1996, Journal of applied physiology.

[7]  Bernhard E. Boser,et al.  A training algorithm for optimal margin classifiers , 1992, COLT '92.

[8]  S C Wearing,et al.  The effect of visual targeting on ground reaction force and temporospatial parameters of gait. , 2000, Clinical biomechanics.

[9]  M. Turvey,et al.  Variability and Determinism in Motor Behavior , 2002, Journal of motor behavior.

[10]  Maria Cristina Bisi,et al.  Gait variability and stability measures: Minimum number of strides and within-session reliability , 2014, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[11]  H Hatze,et al.  Motion variability--its definition, quantification, and origin. , 1986, Journal of motor behavior.

[12]  Jeffrey M. Hausdorff,et al.  Gait variability and fall risk in community-living older adults: a 1-year prospective study. , 2001, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[13]  Jonathan B Dingwell,et al.  Differences between local and orbital dynamic stability during human walking. , 2007, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[14]  Karl M Newell,et al.  Diagnosing fatigue in gait patterns by support vector machines and self-organizing maps. , 2011, Human movement science.

[15]  N. Stergiou,et al.  Human movement variability, nonlinear dynamics, and pathology: is there a connection? , 2011, Human movement science.

[16]  D. Elliott,et al.  The effects of targeting on the ground reaction forces during level walking , 1993 .

[17]  Joyce P Trost,et al.  Measurement and management of errors in quantitative gait data. , 2004, Gait & posture.

[18]  Chih-Jen Lin,et al.  A Practical Guide to Support Vector Classication , 2008 .

[19]  Nicholas Stergiou,et al.  Movement Variability and the Use of Nonlinear Tools: Principles to Guide Physical Therapist Practice , 2009, Physical Therapy.

[20]  D. Sternad,et al.  Decomposition of variability in the execution of goal-oriented tasks: three components of skill improvement. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[21]  J. Dingwell,et al.  Nonlinear time series analysis of normal and pathological human walking. , 2000, Chaos.

[22]  Corinna Cortes,et al.  Support-Vector Networks , 1995, Machine Learning.

[23]  R Begg,et al.  A machine learning approach for automated recognition of movement patterns using basic, kinetic and kinematic gait data. , 2005, Journal of biomechanics.

[24]  Wolfgang I,et al.  Applications of Systems Dynamic Principles to Technique and Strength Training , 2003 .

[25]  N. Stergiou,et al.  Nonlinear dynamics indicates aging affects variability during gait. , 2003, Clinical biomechanics.

[26]  Joseph Hamill,et al.  Reliability of selected ground reaction force parameters during walking , 1990 .

[27]  W. Schöllhorn,et al.  Exploiting system fluctuations. Differential training in physical prevention and rehabilitation programs for health and exercise. , 2010, Medicina.

[28]  Jeffrey M. Hausdorff,et al.  Gait variability and basal ganglia disorders: Stride‐to‐stride variations of gait cycle timing in parkinson's disease and Huntington's disease , 1998, Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society.

[29]  Peter Federolf,et al.  A holistic approach to study the temporal variability in gait. , 2012, Journal of biomechanics.

[30]  Jeffrey M. Hausdorff Gait dynamics, fractals and falls: finding meaning in the stride-to-stride fluctuations of human walking. , 2007, Human movement science.

[31]  M. Pandy,et al.  Variability of walking in able-bodied adults across different time intervals , 2014 .

[32]  Chih-Jen Lin,et al.  LIBLINEAR: A Library for Large Linear Classification , 2008, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[33]  K. An,et al.  Repeated measures of adult normal walking using a video tracking system 1 Presented in part at the 1 , 1997 .

[34]  Adam Shortland,et al.  Extrinsic and intrinsic variation in kinematic data from the gait of healthy adult subjects , 2006 .

[35]  N. Stergiou,et al.  Optimal Movement Variability: A New Theoretical Perspective for Neurologic Physical Therapy , 2006, Journal of neurologic physical therapy : JNPT.

[36]  Chong Peng,et al.  A Supervised Learning Model for High-Dimensional and Large-Scale Data , 2016, ACM Trans. Intell. Syst. Technol..

[37]  D. Janssen,et al.  Recognition of Emotions in Gait Patterns by Means of Artificial Neural Nets , 2008 .

[38]  Jeffrey M. Hausdorff,et al.  Is walking a random walk? Evidence for long-range correlations in stride interval of human gait. , 1995, Journal of applied physiology.

[39]  Renato Rodano,et al.  Movement variability and skills monitoring in sports , 2013, Sports biomechanics.

[40]  W I Schöllhorn,et al.  Applications of artificial neural nets in clinical biomechanics. , 2004, Clinical biomechanics.

[41]  W. Eric L. Grimson,et al.  Gait analysis for recognition and classification , 2002, Proceedings of Fifth IEEE International Conference on Automatic Face Gesture Recognition.

[42]  Joseph Hamill,et al.  Variability of Stride Characteristics and Joint Coordination among Individuals with Unilateral Patellofemoral Pain , 2002 .

[43]  K. Torre,et al.  Fractal dynamics of human gait: a reassessment of the 1996 data of Hausdorff et al. , 2009, Journal of applied physiology.

[44]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  Statistical Pattern Recognition: A Review , 2000, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[45]  B T Bates,et al.  Single-subject methodology: an alternative approach. , 1996, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[46]  B M Nigg,et al.  Identification of individual walking patterns using time discrete and time continuous data sets. , 2002, Gait & posture.

[47]  George E Gorton,et al.  Assessment of the kinematic variability among 12 motion analysis laboratories. , 2009, Gait & posture.

[48]  Jacob Cohen Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[49]  M. Carpenter The Co-ordination and Regulation of Movements , 1968 .

[50]  Benno M. Nigg,et al.  Daily changes of individual gait patterns identified by means of support vector machines. , 2016, Gait & posture.

[51]  Karl M. Newell,et al.  Variability in Motor Output As Noise: A Default and Erroneous Proposition? , 2006 .

[52]  M. Morris,et al.  The reliability of three-dimensional kinematic gait measurements: a systematic review. , 2009, Gait & posture.

[53]  K. Newell,et al.  Time scales in motor learning and development. , 2001, Psychological review.