An evidential reasoning based approach for quality function deployment under uncertainty

Quality function deployment (QFD) is a methodology for translating customer wants (WHATs) into relevant engineering design requirements (HOWs) and often involves a group of cross-functional team members from marketing, design, quality, finance and production and a group of customers. The QFD team is responsible for assessing the relationships between WHATs and HOWs and the interrelationships between HOWs, and the customers are chosen for assessing the relative importance of each customer want. Each member and customer from different backgrounds often demonstrates significantly different behavior from the others and generates different assessment results, complete and incomplete, precise and imprecise, known and unknown, leading to the QFD with great uncertainty. In this paper, we present an evidential reasoning (ER) based methodology for synthesizing various types of assessment information provided by a group of customers and multiple QFD team members. The proposed ER-based QFD methodology can be used to help the QFD team prioritize design requirements with both customer wants and customers' preferences taken into account. It is verified and illustrated with a numerical example.

[1]  E. Ertugrul Karsak,et al.  Fuzzy multiple objective programming framework to prioritize design requirements in quality function deployment , 2004, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[2]  Kwang-Jae Kim,et al.  Determination of an Optimal Set of Design Requirements Using House of Quality , 1998 .

[3]  Jian-Bo Yang,et al.  Interval weight generation approaches based on consistency test and interval comparison matrices , 2005, Appl. Math. Comput..

[4]  M. Singh,et al.  An Evidential Reasoning Approach for Multiple-Attribute Decision Making with Uncertainty , 1994, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Syst..

[5]  Yoji Akao,et al.  Quality Function Deployment : Integrating Customer Requirements into Product Design , 1990 .

[6]  Gary S. Wasserman,et al.  ON HOW TO PRIORITIZE DESIGN REQUIREMENTS DURING THE QFD PLANNING PROCESS , 1993 .

[7]  Jiafu Tang,et al.  Rating technical attributes in fuzzy QFD by integrating fuzzy weighted average method and fuzzy expected value operator , 2006, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[8]  Da Ruan,et al.  Quality function deployment implementation based on analytic network process with linguistic data: An application in automotive industry , 2005, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst..

[9]  Jian-Bo Yang,et al.  The evidential reasoning approach for multi-attribute decision analysis under interval uncertainty , 2006, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[10]  Fariborz Y. Partovi,et al.  An analytical model of process choice in the chemical industry , 2007 .

[11]  Li Lin,et al.  Methods for processing and prioritizing customer demands in variant product design , 2004 .

[12]  Min Xie,et al.  The implementation of quality function deployment based on linguistic data , 2001, J. Intell. Manuf..

[13]  Eleonora Bottani,et al.  Strategic management of logistics service: A fuzzy QFD approach , 2006 .

[14]  Jian-Bo Yang,et al.  Environmental impact assessment using the evidential reasoning approach , 2006, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[15]  Jian-Bo Yang,et al.  On the evidential reasoning algorithm for multiple attribute decision analysis under uncertainty , 2002, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A.

[16]  Yong-pil Kim,et al.  Determining customer‐oriented technical importance ratings: an evaluative study , 2005 .

[17]  V. Selladurai,et al.  Fuzzy logic approach to prioritise engineering characteristics in quality function deployment (FL‐QFD) , 2004 .

[18]  Michael A. Mullens,et al.  AN AHP FRAMEWORK FOR PRIORITIZING CUSTOMER REQUIREMENTS IN QFD: AN INDUSTRIALIZED HOUSING APPLICATION , 1994 .

[19]  C K Kwong,et al.  Determining the Importance Weights for the Customer Requirements in QFD Using a Fuzzy AHP with an Extent Analysis Approach , 2003 .

[20]  Da Ruan,et al.  Determining the importance weights for the design requirements in the house of quality using the fuzzy analytic network approach , 2004 .

[21]  Fiorenzo Franceschini,et al.  QFD: an interactive algorithm for the prioritization of product’s technical design characteristics , 2002 .

[22]  Glenn Shafer,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Evidence , 2020, A Mathematical Theory of Evidence.

[23]  Ashraf Labib,et al.  A Fuzzy Quality Function Deployment (FQFD) model for deriving optimum targets , 2001 .

[24]  Jian-Bo Yang,et al.  A General Multi-Level Evaluation Process for Hybrid MADM With Uncertainty , 1994, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Syst..

[25]  Ming-Lu Wu,et al.  A systematic approach to quality function deployment with a full illustrative example , 2005 .

[26]  Gülçin Büyüközkan,et al.  Group decision making to better respond customer needs in software development , 2005, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[27]  Jian-Bo Yang,et al.  Nonlinear information aggregation via evidential reasoning in multiattribute decision analysis under uncertainty , 2002, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A.

[28]  Gülçin Büyüközkan,et al.  A fuzzy optimization model for QFD planning process using analytic network approach , 2006, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[29]  M. Lu,et al.  Integrating QFD, AHP and Benchmarking in Strategic Marketing , 1994 .

[30]  Hsing-Pei Kao,et al.  Rating the importance of customer needs in quality function deployment by fuzzy and entropy methods , 1999 .

[31]  Jian-Bo Yang,et al.  The evidential reasoning approach for multiple attribute decision analysis using interval belief degrees , 2006, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[32]  Jinxing Xie,et al.  An intelligent hybrid system for customer requirements analysis and product attribute targets determination , 1998 .

[33]  E. Ertugrul Karsak,et al.  Fuzzy multiple objective decision making approach to prioritize design requirements in quality function deployment , 2004 .

[34]  Ming-Lu Wu,et al.  Quality function deployment: A literature review , 2002, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[35]  Shing I. Chang,et al.  An integrated group decision-making approach to quality function deployment , 1999 .

[36]  Hsin-Hung Wu,et al.  Applying grey model to prioritise technical measures in quality function deployment , 2006 .

[37]  N. P. Mukherjee,et al.  Rapid hard tooling process selection using QFD‐AHP methodology , 2006 .

[38]  Thong Ngee Goh,et al.  A comparative study of the prioritization matrix method and the analytic hierarchy process technique in quality function deployment , 1998 .

[39]  Jian-Bo Yang,et al.  Rule and utility based evidential reasoning approach for multiattribute decision analysis under uncertainties , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[40]  Liang-Hsuan Chen,et al.  A fuzzy model for exploiting quality function deployment , 2003 .

[41]  House of quality: A fuzzy logic-based requirements analysis , 1999, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[42]  R. Y. K. Fung,et al.  Fuzzy expected value modelling approach for determining target values of engineering characteristics in QFD , 2005 .

[43]  Jian-Bo Yang,et al.  The evidential reasoning approach for MADA under both probabilistic and fuzzy uncertainties , 2006, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[44]  Chang Hee Han,et al.  Prioritizing engineering characteristics in quality function deployment with incomplete information: A linear partial ordering approach , 2004 .

[45]  Shiang-Tai Liu Rating design requirements in fuzzy quality function deployment via a mathematical programming approach , 2005 .

[46]  Juite Wang,et al.  Fuzzy outranking approach to prioritize design requirements in quality function deployment , 1999 .

[47]  C. K. Kwong,et al.  A fuzzy AHP approach to the determination of importance weights of customer requirements in quality function deployment , 2002, J. Intell. Manuf..

[48]  Li Pheng Khoo,et al.  Framework of a fuzzy quality function deployment system , 1996 .

[49]  Sevin Sozer,et al.  Product planning in quality function deployment using a combined analytic network process and goal programming approach , 2003 .

[50]  Liang-Hsuan Chen,et al.  An evaluation approach to engineering design in QFD processes using fuzzy goal programming models , 2006, Eur. J. Oper. Res..