Article with Peer Commentaries and Response Infant Perseveration and Implications for Object Permanence Theories: a Pdp Model of the Ab B Task

From the earliest ages at which infants search for hidden objects, they make the AB error, searching perseveratively at previous rather than current hiding locations (Piaget, 1954). This paper presents a parallel distributed processing (PDP) model that instantiates an explicit set of processing mechanisms to account for a large and diverse set of data on infants’ AB errors. The model demonstrates how basic processes–the formation of latent memory traces and their interaction with developing active memory traces–can provide a unifying framework for understanding why and when infants perseverate. Novel predictions from the model are discussed, together with its challenges for theories that posit a concept of object permanence in the first year of life.

[1]  J. Haldane The interaction of nature and nurture. , 1946, Annals of eugenics.

[2]  Richard Stone,et al.  A Simple Model , 1951 .

[3]  J. Piaget The construction of reality in the child , 1954 .

[4]  G. Gratch,et al.  Piaget's stage IV object concept error: evidence of forgetting or object conception? , 1974, Child development.

[5]  P. Harris Perseverative search at a visibly empty place by young infants. , 1974 .

[6]  G. Butterworth Object disappearance and error in Piaget's Stage IV task. , 1977 .

[7]  R. Schranner Dynamic systems , 1977, Nature.

[8]  R. E. Schuberth,et al.  The Stage IV Error in Piaget's Theory of Object Concept Development: A Reconsideration of the Spatial Localization Hypothesis. , 1978 .

[9]  J. Gavin Bremner,et al.  Egocentric Versus Allocentric Spatial Coding in Nine-Month-Old Infants: Factors Influencing the Choice of Code , 1978 .

[10]  J. G. Bremner,et al.  Spatial errors made by infants: inadequate spatial cues or evidence of egocentrism? , 1978, British journal of psychology.

[11]  J. Fuster Prefrontal Cortex , 2018 .

[12]  Elizabeth Ligon Bjork,et al.  Perseveration and Search on a Five-Choice Visible Displacement Hiding Task , 1983 .

[13]  Elizabeth Ligon Bjork,et al.  Search Behavior on Multi-Choice Hiding Tasks: Evidence for an Objective Conception of Space in Infancy , 1983 .

[14]  E. Bjork,et al.  Infant search errors: Stage of concept development or stage of memory development , 1984, Memory & Cognition.

[15]  J J Hopfield,et al.  Neurons with graded response have collective computational properties like those of two-state neurons. , 1984, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  J. Bremner,et al.  Piagetian Stage IV Search Errors with an Object That is Directly Accessible Both Visually and Manually , 1984, Perception.

[17]  J. Hopfield Neurons withgraded response havecollective computational properties likethoseoftwo-state neurons , 1984 .

[18]  C. Sophian,et al.  Infants' search for visible objects: implications for the interpretation of early search errors. , 1985, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[19]  A. Diamond,et al.  Development of the ability to use recall to guide action, as indicated by infants' performance on AB. , 1985, Child development.

[20]  C. Brainerd,et al.  On the independence of short-term memory and working memory in cognitive development , 1985, Cognitive Psychology.

[21]  L. Acredolo,et al.  The role of attentiveness, mobility history, and separation of hiding sites on stage IV search behavior , 1986 .

[22]  H. Wellman,et al.  Infant search and object permanence: a meta-analysis of the A-not-B error. , 1987, Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development.

[23]  Renee L Baillargeon,et al.  Evidence of Location Memory in 8-Month-Old Infants in a Nonsearch AB Task. , 1988 .

[24]  J. Changeux,et al.  A Simple Model of Prefrontal Cortex Function in Delayed-Response Tasks , 1989, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[25]  Renee L Baillargeon,et al.  Location memory in 8-month-old infants in a non-search AB task: Further evidence , 1989 .

[26]  V. Reyna,et al.  Gist is the grist: Fuzzy-trace theory and the new intuitionism☆ , 1990 .

[27]  Renée Baillargeon,et al.  Why do young infants fail to search for hidden objects? , 1990, Cognition.

[28]  James L. McClelland,et al.  On the control of automatic processes: a parallel distributed processing account of the Stroop effect. , 1990, Psychological review.

[29]  A. Diamond Neuropsychological insights into the meaning of object concept development. , 1991 .

[30]  Mark H. Johnson,et al.  Biology and Cognitive Development: The Case of Face Recognition , 1993 .

[31]  J. Cohen,et al.  Context, cortex, and dopamine: a connectionist approach to behavior and biology in schizophrenia. , 1992, Psychological review.

[32]  P. Green Biology and Cognitive Development: the Case of Face Recognition, Mark H. Johnson, John Morton. Blackwell, Oxford (1991), x, +180. Price £35.00 hardback, £10.95 paperback , 1992 .

[33]  V. Reyna,et al.  Memory independence and memory interference in cognitive development. , 1993, Psychological review.

[34]  R. Roberts,et al.  Prefrontal cognitive processes: Working memory and inhibition in the antisaccade task. , 1994 .

[35]  Martha J. Farah,et al.  Mechanisms of Spatial Attention: The Relation of Macrostructure to Microstructure in Parietal Neglect , 1994, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[36]  L. Schauble,et al.  Beyond Modularity: A Developmental Perspective on Cognitive Science. , 1994 .

[37]  Gyöorgy Benedek,et al.  A Dynamic Systems Approach to Development: Applications , 1994, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[38]  R. Desimone,et al.  Parallel neuronal mechanisms for short-term memory. , 1994, Science.

[39]  A. Karmiloff-Smith Précis of Beyond modularity: A developmental perspective on cognitive science , 1994, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[40]  C. Connor,et al.  Covert attention suppresses neuronal responses in area 7a of the posterior parietal cortex. , 1994, Journal of neurophysiology.

[41]  Adele Diamond,et al.  AB with multiple wells. I: Why are multiple wells sometimes easier than two wells?. II: memory or memory + inhibition? , 1994 .

[42]  D. Lewkowicz,et al.  A dynamic systems approach to the development of cognition and action. , 2007, Journal of cognitive neuroscience.

[43]  J. Elman,et al.  Rethinking Innateness: A Connectionist Perspective on Development , 1996 .

[44]  J. Reznick,et al.  Response modality affects human infant delayed-response performance. , 1996, Child development.

[45]  R. Siegler Emerging Minds: The Process of Change in Children's Thinking , 1996 .

[46]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  A preliminary theory of the interactions between prefrontal cortex and hippocampus that contribute to planning and prospective memory. , 1996 .

[47]  R. O’Reilly,et al.  A computational approach to prefrontal cortex, cognitive control and schizophrenia: recent developments and current challenges. , 1996, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[48]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Rethinking infant knowledge: toward an adaptive process account of successes and failures in object permanence tasks. , 1997, Psychological review.

[49]  Edward E. Smith,et al.  Temporal dynamics of brain activation during a working memory task , 1997, Nature.

[50]  Yuko Munakata,et al.  Perseverative reaching in infancy: The roles of hidden toys and motor history in the AB task , 1997 .

[51]  T. Ruffman,et al.  Why do infants make A not B errors in a search task, yet show memory for the location of hidden objects in a nonsearch task? , 1998, Developmental psychology.

[52]  Alfonso Caramazza,et al.  Mechanisms of Spatial Attention Revealed by Hemispatial Neglect , 1999, Cortex.

[53]  John J. Hopfield,et al.  Neural networks and physical systems with emergent collective computational abilities , 1999 .

[54]  N. Chater,et al.  Computational models and Rethinking innateness , 1999, Journal of Child Language.