Tailoring Interface for Spanish Language: A Case Study with CHICA System

We developed a clinical decision support system (CDSS) --- Child Health Improvement through Computer Automation (CHICA) - to deliver patient specific guidance at the point of clinical care. CHICA captures structured data from families, physicians, and nursing, staff using a scannable paper user interface - Adaptive Turnaround Documents (ATD) while remaining sensitive to the workflow constraints of a busy outpatient pediatric practice. The system was deployed in November 2004 with an English language only user interface. In July 2005, we enhanced the user interface with a Spanish version of the pre-screening questionnaire to capture information from Spanish speaking families in our clinic. Subsequently, our results show an increase in rate of family responses to the pre-screening questionnaire by 36% (51% vs. 87%) in a four month time period before and after the Spanish interface deployment and up to 32% (51% vs. 83%) since November 2004. Furthermore, our results show that Spanish speaking families, on average, respond to the questionnaire more than English speaking families (85% vs. 49%). This paper describes the design, implementation challenges and our measure of success when trying to adapt a computer scannable paper interface to another language.

[1]  C. McDonald,et al.  A computerized reminder system to increase the use of preventive care for hospitalized patients. , 2001, The New England journal of medicine.

[2]  T A Pryor,et al.  Rationale for the Arden Syntax. , 1994, Computers and biomedical research, an international journal.

[3]  S. Fletcher,et al.  Prompting physicians for preventive procedures: a five-year study of manual and computer reminders. , 1990, American journal of preventive medicine.

[4]  R. Haynes,et al.  Effects of computer-based clinical decision support systems on physician performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review. , 1998, JAMA.

[5]  Bonnie Kaplan,et al.  Evaluating informatics applications - clinical decision support systems literature review , 2001, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[6]  C. McDonald,et al.  The Regenstrief Medical Record System: 20 years of experience in hospitals, clinics, and neighborhood health centers. , 1992, M.D. computing : computers in medical practice.

[7]  Stephen M. Downs,et al.  Mining association rules from a pediatric primary care decision support system , 2000, AMIA.

[8]  C. McDonald Protocol-based computer reminders, the quality of care and the non-perfectability of man. , 1976, The New England journal of medicine.

[9]  Vibha Anand,et al.  Child Health Improvement through Computer Automation: The CHICA System , 2004, MedInfo.

[10]  Frank Sullivan,et al.  Has general practitioner computing made a difference to patient care? A systematic review of published reports , 1995, BMJ.

[11]  Vibha Anand,et al.  Automating the Recognition and Prioritization of Needed Preventive Services: Early Results from the CHICA System , 2005, AMIA.

[12]  R. Haynes,et al.  Effects of Computer-based Clinical Decision Support Systems on Clinician Performance and Patient Outcome: A Critical Appraisal of Research , 1994, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[13]  Stephen M. Downs,et al.  Computer-Supported Preventive Services for Children: The C.H.I.P. Project. , 1995 .

[14]  Stephen M. Downs,et al.  Expected value prioritization of prompts and reminders , 2002, AMIA.

[15]  Vibha Anand,et al.  Human and System Errors, Using Adaptive Turnaround Documents to Capture Data in a Busy Practice , 2005, AMIA.