Monitoring collaborative activities in computer supported collaborative learning

Monitoring the learning process in computer supported collaborative learning (CSCL) environments is a key element for supporting the efficacy of tutor actions. This article proposes an approach for analysing learning processes in a CSCL environment to support tutors in their monitoring tasks. The approach entails tracking the interactions within the communication platform to identify cues of the participative, social, cognitive, and teaching dimensions of the learning process. Both quantitative and qualitative indicators are employed to achieve a complete and thorough picture of the learning dynamics. A set of methodological and technological tools based on this approach has been tried out in the context of the online component of a blended course in educational technology addressing trainee teachers. The results of the study support the applicability of the proposed approach to content domains where discussion and reflective practice are the most effective learning strategy.

[1]  Luigi Sarti,et al.  A general framework for tracking and analysing learning processes in computer‐supported collaborative learning environments , 2007 .

[2]  Curtis J. Bonk,et al.  Content analysis of online discussion in an applied educational psychology course , 2000 .

[3]  Fatos Xhafa,et al.  An Integrated Approach for Analysing and Assessing the Performance of Virtual Learning Groups , 2004, CRIWG.

[4]  James Dalziel,et al.  Implementing learning design : the Learning Activity Management System (LAMS) , 2003 .

[5]  Lisa Lobry de Bruyn,et al.  Monitoring online communication: can the development of convergence and social presence indicate an interactive learning environment? , 2004 .

[6]  Tina Benevides,et al.  E-Learning in the 21st Century: A Framework for Research and Practice , 2011 .

[7]  Francesca Pozzi.  Using Collaborative Techniques in Virtual Learning Communities , 2009, EC-TEL.

[8]  Derek Rowntree,et al.  Teaching and learning online: a correspondence education for the 21st century? , 1995, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[9]  Pierre Dillenbourg,et al.  Collaborative Learning: Cognitive and Computational Approaches , 1999 .

[10]  Zane L. Berge,et al.  Facilitating Interaction in Computer Mediated Online Courses , 1996 .

[11]  Alejandra Martínez-Monés,et al.  Combining qualitative evaluation and social network analysis for the study of classroom social interactions , 2003, Comput. Educ..

[12]  D. Randy Garrison,et al.  Critical Inquiry in a Text-Based Environment: Computer Conferencing in Higher Education , 1999, Internet High. Educ..

[13]  D. Garrison,et al.  Assessing Social Presence In Asynchronous Text-based Computer Conferencing , 1999 .

[14]  Sarah Schrire,et al.  Knowledge building in asynchronous discussion groups: Going beyond quantitative analysis , 2006, Comput. Educ..

[15]  Morten Søby.  Waiting for Electropolis , 1992 .

[16]  John D. Bransford,et al.  Some thoughts about constructivism and instructional design , 1991 .

[17]  D. Newman,et al.  A Content Analysis Method to Measure Critical Thinking in Face-to-Face and Computer Supported Group Learning , 1995 .

[18]  Vic Lally,et al.  Online teaching in networked learning communities: A multi-method approach to studying the role of the teacher , 2007 .

[19]  Angel A. Juan,et al.  Supporting Effective Monitoring and Knowledge Building in Online Collaborative Learning Systems , 2008, WSKS.

[20]  Daniel V. Eastmond.  E-Moderating: The Key to Teaching and Learning Online , 2003 .

[21]  Marlene Scardamalia,et al.  Computer Support for Knowledge-Building Communities , 1994 .

[22]  D. Garrison,et al.  Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education , 2001 .

[23]  Curtis J. Bonk,et al.  No . 2-98 Content Analysis of Online Discussion in an Applied Educational Psychology , 2000 .

[24]  Donatella Persico,et al.  Online or face-to-face? Experimenting with different techniques in teacher training , 2007, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[25]  D. Garrison,et al.  Methodological Issues in the Content Analysis of Computer Conference Transcripts , 2007 .

[26]  Alejandra Martínez-Monés,et al.  From Mirroring to Guiding: A Review of State of the Art Technology for Supporting Collaborative Learning , 2005, Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ..

[27]  Charalambos Vrasidas,et al.  Listening for Silence in Text‐Based, Online Encounters , 2007 .

[28]  Charles R. Beck.  Strategies for cueing visual information: research findings and instructional design implications , 1991 .

[29]  Tammy Schellens,et al.  Content analysis schemes to analyze transcripts of online asynchronous discussion groups: A review , 2006, Comput. Educ..

[30]  Heather Kanuka,et al.  E-Research: Methods, Strategies, and Issues , 2003 .

[31]  L. Lipponen,et al.  Patterns of participation and discourse in elementary students’ computer-supported collaborative learning , 2003 .

[32]  N. Ding,et al.  Computer Supported Collaborative Learning Practices – CSCL2009 Conference Proceedings , 2009 .

[33]  F. Fischer,et al.  A framework to analyze argumentative knowledge construction in computer-supported collaborative learning , 2006, Comput. Educ..

[34]  Michael Coghlan,et al.  Online Collaborative Learning: Theory and Practice , 2004, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..