The 3.2 Å resolution structure of a receptor: CheA:CheW signaling complex defines overlapping binding sites and key residue interactions within bacterial chemosensory arrays.

Bacterial chemosensory arrays are composed of extended networks of chemoreceptors (also known as methyl-accepting chemotaxis proteins, MCPs), the histidine kinase CheA, and the adaptor protein CheW. Models of these arrays have been developed from cryoelectron microscopy, crystal structures of binary and ternary complexes, NMR spectroscopy, mutational, data and biochemical studies. A new 3.2 Å resolution crystal structure of a Thermotoga maritima MCP protein interaction region in complex with the CheA kinase-regulatory module (P4-P5) and adaptor protein CheW provides sufficient detail to define residue contacts at the interfaces formed among the three proteins. As in a previous 4.5 Å resolution structure, CheA-P5 and CheW interact through conserved hydrophobic surfaces at the ends of their β-barrels to form pseudo 6-fold symmetric rings in which the two proteins alternate around the circumference. The interface between P5 subdomain 1 and CheW subdomain 2 was anticipated from previous studies, whereas the related interface between CheW subdomain 1 and P5 subdomain 2 has only been observed in these ring assemblies. The receptor forms an unexpected structure in that the helical hairpin tip of each subunit has "unzipped" into a continuous α-helix; four such helices associate into a bundle, and the tetramers bridge adjacent P5-CheW rings in the lattice through interactions with both P5 and CheW. P5 and CheW each bind a receptor helix with a groove of conserved hydrophobic residues between subdomains 1 and 2. P5 binds the receptor helix N-terminal to the tip region (lower site), whereas CheW binds the same helix with inverted polarity near the bundle end (upper site). Sequence comparisons among different evolutionary classes of chemotaxis proteins show that the binding partners undergo correlated changes at key residue positions that involve the lower site. Such evolutionary analyses argue that both CheW and P5 bind to the receptor tip at overlapping positions. Computational genomics further reveal that two distinct CheW proteins in Thermotogae utilize the analogous recognition motifs to couple different receptor classes to the same CheA kinase. Important residues for function previously identified by mutagenesis, chemical modification and biophysical approaches also map to these same interfaces. Thus, although the native CheW-receptor interaction is not observed in the present crystal structure, the bioinformatics and previous data predict key features of this interface. The companion study of the P5-receptor interface in native arrays (accompanying paper Piasta et al. (2013) Biochemistry, DOI: 10.1021/bi400385c) shows that, despite the non-native receptor fold in the present crystal structure, the local helix-in-groove contacts of the crystallographic P5-receptor interaction are present in native arrays and are essential for receptor regulation of kinase activity.

[1]  J. S. Parkinson,et al.  Constitutively signaling fragments of Tsr, the Escherichia coli serine chemoreceptor , 1994, Journal of bacteriology.

[2]  J. Freed,et al.  Structure of the ternary complex formed by a chemotaxis receptor signaling domain, the CheA histidine kinase, and the coupling protein CheW as determined by pulsed dipolar ESR spectroscopy. , 2010, Biochemistry.

[3]  M. Simon,et al.  Structure of CheA, a Signal-Transducing Histidine Kinase , 1999, Cell.

[4]  B E Dunn,et al.  Helicobacter pylori , 1997, Clinical microbiology reviews.

[5]  S. L. Porter,et al.  Rhodobacter sphaeroides: complexity in chemotactic signalling. , 2008, Trends in microbiology.

[6]  Gabriela Gonzalez-Bonet,et al.  Reconstruction of the chemotaxis receptor–kinase assembly , 2006, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[7]  I. Zhulin,et al.  The superfamily of chemotaxis transducers: from physiology to genomics and back. , 2001, Advances in microbial physiology.

[8]  G. Jensen,et al.  Bacterial chemoreceptor arrays are hexagonally packed trimers of receptor dimers networked by rings of kinase and coupling proteins , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  J. Stock,et al.  Crystal Structure of the CheA Histidine Phosphotransfer Domain that Mediates Response Regulator Phosphorylation in Bacterial Chemotaxis* , 2001, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[10]  Bi-Cheng Wang,et al.  Crystal structure of a novel non-Pfam protein PF2046 solved using low resolution B-factor sharpening and multi-crystal averaging methods , 2010, Protein & Cell.

[11]  Budd Evolutionary Genomics , 2012, Methods in Molecular Biology.

[12]  J. Massagué TGF-beta signal transduction. , 1998, Annual review of biochemistry.

[13]  Davi R. Ortega,et al.  Universal architecture of bacterial chemoreceptor arrays , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[14]  J. Maddock,et al.  Polar Localization of a Soluble Methyl-Accepting Protein of Pseudomonas aeruginosa , 2005, Journal of bacteriology.

[15]  Koichiro Tamura,et al.  MEGA6: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis version 6.0. , 2013, Molecular biology and evolution.

[16]  Dennis Bray,et al.  Signal amplification in a lattice of coupled protein kinases. , 2009, Molecular bioSystems.

[17]  Igor B. Zhulin,et al.  The MiST2 database: a comprehensive genomics resource on microbial signal transduction , 2009, Nucleic Acids Res..

[18]  Hongjun Zhou,et al.  The receptor-CheW binding interface in bacterial chemotaxis. , 2012, Journal of molecular biology.

[19]  C. Russell,et al.  Spring-Loaded Heptad Repeat Residues Regulate the Expression and Activation of Paramyxovirus Fusion Protein , 2007, Journal of Virology.

[20]  M. Nei,et al.  MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. , 2011, Molecular biology and evolution.

[21]  F. Dahlquist,et al.  CheA-receptor interaction sites in bacterial chemotaxis. , 2012, Journal of molecular biology.

[22]  B. Crane,et al.  The structure of a soluble chemoreceptor suggests a mechanism for propagating conformational signals. , 2009, Biochemistry.

[23]  L E Kay,et al.  Structure and dynamics of a CheY-binding domain of the chemotaxis kinase CheA determined by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. , 1996, Biochemistry.

[24]  J. S. Parkinson,et al.  Mutational Analysis of the Chemoreceptor-Coupling Domain of the Escherichia coli Chemotaxis Signaling Kinase CheA , 2006, Journal of bacteriology.

[25]  J. Rizo,et al.  Enlightening molecular mechanisms through study of protein interactions. , 2012, Journal of molecular cell biology.

[26]  Alfonso Valencia,et al.  Protein co-evolution, co-adaptation and interactions , 2008, The EMBO journal.

[27]  J. S. Parkinson,et al.  Different Signaling Roles of Two Conserved Residues in the Cytoplasmic Hairpin Tip of Tsr, the Escherichia coli Serine Chemoreceptor , 2008, Journal of bacteriology.

[28]  J P Armitage,et al.  TlpC, a novel chemotaxis protein in Rhodobacter sphaeroides, localizes to a discrete region in the cytoplasm , 2002, Molecular microbiology.

[29]  T. Hwa,et al.  Identification of direct residue contacts in protein–protein interaction by message passing , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[30]  G L Hazelbauer,et al.  Transmembrane signaling in bacterial chemoreceptors. , 2001, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[31]  Z. Otwinowski,et al.  Processing of X-ray diffraction data collected in oscillation mode. , 1997, Methods in enzymology.

[32]  Igor B. Zhulin,et al.  Evolutionary genomics reveals conserved structural determinants of signaling and adaptation in microbial chemoreceptors , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[33]  C. Clevenger Signal transduction. , 2003, Breast disease.

[34]  J. S. Parkinson,et al.  Cysteine-Scanning Analysis of the Chemoreceptor-Coupling Domain of the Escherichia coli Chemotaxis Signaling Kinase CheA , 2006, Journal of bacteriology.

[35]  Michael P. Cummings,et al.  MEGA (Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis) , 2004 .

[36]  Julio Collado-Vides,et al.  A powerful non-homology method for the prediction of operons in prokaryotes , 2002, ISMB.

[37]  Thomas L. Madden,et al.  Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. , 1997, Nucleic acids research.

[38]  G. Wadhams,et al.  Making sense of it all: bacterial chemotaxis , 2004, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[39]  Christine Josenhans,et al.  Bacterial energy taxis: a global strategy? , 2010, Archives of Microbiology.

[40]  M. Welch,et al.  Structure of the CheY-binding domain of histidine kinase CheA in complex with CheY , 1998, Nature Structural Biology.

[41]  G. Caetano-Anollés,et al.  Role of Motility and Chemotaxis in Efficiency of Nodulation by Rhizobium meliloti. , 1988, Plant physiology.

[42]  J. Falke,et al.  Mapping out regions on the surface of the aspartate receptor that are essential for kinase activation. , 2003, Biochemistry.

[43]  J. Stock,et al.  Organization of the Receptor-Kinase Signaling Array That Regulates Escherichia coli Chemotaxis* , 2002, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[44]  Sara Linse,et al.  Methods for the detection and analysis of protein–protein interactions , 2007, Proteomics.

[45]  M. Simon,et al.  Helical shifts generate two distinct conformers in the atomic resolution structure of the CheA phosphotransferase domain from Thermotoga maritima. , 2004, Journal of molecular biology.

[46]  Sung-Hou Kim,et al.  Four-helical-bundle structure of the cytoplasmic domain of a serine chemotaxis receptor , 1999, Nature.

[47]  M. Simon,et al.  The solution structure and interactions of CheW from Thermotoga maritima , 2002, Nature Structural Biology.

[48]  P. Rodríguez-Palenzuela,et al.  Role of motility and chemotaxis in the pathogenesis of Dickeya dadantii 3937 (ex Erwinia chrysanthemi 3937). , 2009, Microbiology.

[49]  J. Falke,et al.  Attractant regulation of the aspartate receptor-kinase complex: limited cooperative interactions between receptors and effects of the receptor modification state. , 2000, Biochemistry.

[50]  Kazutaka Katoh,et al.  Parallelization of the MAFFT multiple sequence alignment program , 2010, Bioinform..

[51]  Wagner Meira,et al.  Protein cutoff scanning: A comparative analysis of cutoff dependent and cutoff free methods for prospecting contacts in proteins , 2009, Proteins.

[52]  G. Jensen,et al.  Activated chemoreceptor arrays remain intact and hexagonally packed , 2011, Molecular microbiology.

[53]  J. Zimmerberg,et al.  5.14 The Biophysics of Membrane Fusion , 2012, Comprehensive Biophysics.

[54]  J. S. Parkinson,et al.  Constitutively Signaling Fragments of Tsr, the E. coli Serine Chemoreceptor , 1994 .

[55]  Jun Liu,et al.  Molecular architecture of chemoreceptor arrays revealed by cryoelectron tomography of Escherichia coli minicells , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[56]  Bigger is better: megadalton protein NMR in solution , 2002, Nature Structural Biology.

[57]  Igor B Zhulin,et al.  Comparative genomic and protein sequence analyses of a complex system controlling bacterial chemotaxis. , 2007, Methods in enzymology.

[58]  R. Weis,et al.  Competitive and Cooperative Interactions in Receptor Signaling Complexes* , 2006, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[59]  S. Khan,et al.  Determinants of chemotactic signal amplification in Escherichia coli. , 2001, Journal of molecular biology.

[60]  H R Matthews,et al.  Protein histidine kinase. , 2001, Methods in molecular biology.

[61]  L. Shapiro,et al.  Polar location of the chemoreceptor complex in the Escherichia coli cell. , 1993, Science.

[62]  F. Rey,et al.  X-ray structure of the arenavirus glycoprotein GP2 in its postfusion hairpin conformation , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[63]  Melvin I Simon,et al.  In different organisms, the mode of interaction between two signaling proteins is not necessarily conserved. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[64]  F. Cabello,et al.  Asymmetrical flagellar rotation in Borrelia burgdorferi nonchemotactic mutants , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[65]  M. Simon,et al.  Attenuation of sensory receptor signaling by covalent modification. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[66]  K. Ottemann,et al.  Helicobacter pylori perceives the quorum-sensing molecule AI-2 as a chemorepellent via the chemoreceptor TlpB. , 2011, Microbiology.

[67]  J. Lepault,et al.  Conformational change and protein–protein interactions of the fusion protein of Semliki Forest virus , 2004, Nature.

[68]  Protein footprinting in a complex milieu: identifying the interaction surfaces of the chemotaxis adaptor protein CheW. , 2011, Journal of molecular biology.

[69]  J. Plavec,et al.  The Solution Structure of d(G3T4G4)2 , 2004 .

[70]  N. Charon,et al.  Isolation and characterization of chemotaxis mutants of the Lyme disease Spirochete Borrelia burgdorferi using allelic exchange mutagenesis, flow cytometry, and cell tracking. , 2007, Methods in enzymology.

[71]  D. Koshland,et al.  Role of the CheW protein in bacterial chemotaxis: overexpression is equivalent to absence , 1989, Journal of bacteriology.

[72]  Andrei N. Lupas,et al.  The HAMP Domain Structure Implies Helix Rotation in Transmembrane Signaling , 2006, Cell.

[73]  Robert B. Bourret,et al.  Histidine phosphorylation and phosphoryl group transfer in bacterial chemotaxis , 1988, Nature.

[74]  J. Maddock,et al.  Clustering requires modified methyl‐accepting sites in low‐abundance but not high‐abundance chemoreceptors of Escherichia coli , 2005, Molecular microbiology.

[75]  Z. Otwinowski,et al.  [20] Processing of X-ray diffraction data collected in oscillation mode. , 1997, Methods in enzymology.

[76]  Ned S Wingreen,et al.  Responding to chemical gradients: bacterial chemotaxis. , 2012, Current opinion in cell biology.

[77]  F. Dahlquist,et al.  The contact interface of a 120 kD CheA-CheW complex by methyl TROSY interaction spectroscopy. , 2005, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[78]  Ned S. Wingreen,et al.  Self-Organization of the Escherichia coli Chemotaxis Network Imaged with Super-Resolution Light Microscopy , 2009, PLoS biology.

[79]  Xiongwu Wu,et al.  Lateral density of receptor arrays in the membrane plane influences sensitivity of the E. coli chemotaxis response , 2011, The EMBO journal.

[80]  N. Park,et al.  Motility and Chemotaxis in Tissue Penetration of Oral Epithelial Cell Layers by Treponema denticola , 2001, Infection and Immunity.

[81]  J. S. Parkinson,et al.  Genetic evidence for interaction between the CheW and Tsr proteins during chemoreceptor signaling by Escherichia coli , 1991, Journal of bacteriology.

[82]  J. Falke,et al.  CheA Kinase of bacterial chemotaxis: chemical mapping of four essential docking sites. , 2006, Biochemistry.

[83]  요시히사 기시야마,et al.  Transmitter and receiver , 2007 .

[84]  R. Lamb,et al.  Structural basis of viral invasion: lessons from paramyxovirus F. , 2007, Current opinion in structural biology.

[85]  K. Ottemann,et al.  Bacterial chemotaxis modulates host cell apoptosis to establish a T-helper cell, type 17 (Th17)-dominant immune response in Helicobacter pylori infection , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[86]  K. Ottemann,et al.  ChePep Controls Helicobacter pylori Infection of the Gastric Glands and Chemotaxis in the Epsilonproteobacteria , 2011, mBio.

[87]  J. S. Parkinson,et al.  Transmitter and receiver modules in bacterial signaling proteins. , 1988, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[88]  J. S. Parkinson,et al.  Mutational Analysis of N381, a Key Trimer Contact Residue in Tsr, the Escherichia coli Serine Chemoreceptor , 2011, Journal of bacteriology.

[89]  Joan-Emma Shea,et al.  Computational and experimental analyses reveal the essential roles of interdomain linkers in the biological function of chemotaxis histidine kinase CheA. , 2012, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[90]  R. Weis,et al.  Covalent Modification Regulates Ligand Binding to Receptor Complexes in the Chemosensory System of Escherichia coli , 2000, Cell.

[91]  J. Adler Chemotaxis in bacteria. , 1976, Journal of supramolecular structure.

[92]  Xiongwu Wu,et al.  Chemoreceptors in Caulobacter crescentus: Trimers of Receptor Dimers in a Partially Ordered Hexagonally Packed Array , 2008, Journal of bacteriology.

[93]  W. Wooster,et al.  Crystal structure of , 2005 .

[94]  Sheng Zhang,et al.  A Receptor-Modifying Deamidase in Complex with a Signaling Phosphatase Reveals Reciprocal Regulation , 2006, Cell.

[95]  R. B. Jensen,et al.  Location and architecture of the Caulobacter crescentus chemoreceptor array , 2008, Molecular microbiology.

[96]  F. Dahlquist,et al.  CheW Binding Interactions with CheA and Tar , 2002, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[97]  D E McRee,et al.  XtalView/Xfit--A versatile program for manipulating atomic coordinates and electron density. , 1999, Journal of structural biology.

[98]  M. Simon,et al.  Protein histidine kinases and signal transduction in prokaryotes and eukaryotes. , 1994, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[99]  B. Crane,et al.  Subunit exchange by CheA histidine kinases from the mesophile Escherichia coli and the thermophile Thermotoga maritima. , 2004, Biochemistry.

[100]  I. Zhulin,et al.  Origins and Diversification of a Complex Signal Transduction System in Prokaryotes , 2010, Science Signaling.

[101]  Sung-Hou Kim,et al.  Dynamic and clustering model of bacterial chemotaxis receptors: Structural basis for signaling and high sensitivity , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[102]  D. Kirschner,et al.  A model for Vibrio cholerae colonization of the human intestine. , 2011, Journal of theoretical biology.

[103]  J. S. Parkinson,et al.  Bacterial chemoreceptors: high-performance signaling in networked arrays. , 2008, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[104]  Nathaniel Echols,et al.  The Phenix software for automated determination of macromolecular structures. , 2011, Methods.

[105]  M. Simon,et al.  Transmembrane signal transduction in bacterial chemotaxis involves ligand-dependent activation of phosphate group transfer. , 1989, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[106]  S. Subramaniam,et al.  Direct visualization of Escherichia coli chemotaxis receptor arrays using cryo-electron microscopy , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[107]  R. Stewart,et al.  CheA Kinase and Chemoreceptor Interaction Surfaces on CheW* , 2002, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[108]  Geoffrey J. Barton,et al.  Jalview Version 2—a multiple sequence alignment editor and analysis workbench , 2009, Bioinform..

[109]  F. Dahlquist,et al.  Signal transduction in bacteria: CheW forms a reversible complex with the protein kinase CheA. , 1991, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[110]  Kene N. Piasta,et al.  Defining a key receptor-CheA kinase contact and elucidating its function in the membrane-bound bacterial chemosensory array: a disulfide mapping and TAM-IDS Study. , 2013, Biochemistry.

[111]  Mark S. Johnson,et al.  PAS/poly‐HAMP signalling in Aer‐2, a soluble haem‐based sensor , 2011, Molecular microbiology.

[112]  Randy J. Read,et al.  Phaser crystallographic software , 2007, Journal of applied crystallography.

[113]  J. S. Parkinson,et al.  Loss- and Gain-of-Function Mutations in the F1-HAMP Region of the Escherichia coli Aerotaxis Transducer Aer , 2006, Journal of bacteriology.

[114]  John S Parkinson,et al.  Disruption of chemoreceptor signalling arrays by high levels of CheW, the receptor–kinase coupling protein , 2010, Molecular microbiology.