Prosodic transfer: A comparison study of F0 patterns in L2 English by Chinese speakers

A comparison was made among the fundamental frequency (F0) patterns of continuous speech in English, Mandarin Chinese and L2 English produced by Chinese speakers. Ten adult native Chinese speakers were asked to read narrative text written in both English and Chinese. The comparative analysis of 300 sentences was performed in the following aspects: F0 mean, pitch range, pitch change rate and pitch change amount. It is found that in terms of both pitch range on the phoneme level and pitch change amount on the utterance level, L2 English speech by Chinese subjects displayed a significantly larger value than the English speech by native speakers. Moreover, the same Chinese subjects demonstrated still a larger value in these two pitch-related variables in their Chinese speech. The dynamic characteristic of L2 English can be attributed to the negative transfer of L1 Chinese. The findings can shed some light on the understanding of the difference in F0 patterns between a tone language and a non-tone language, and can also provide some implications for L2 speech learning.

[1]  Hongwei Ding,et al.  Using melody metrics to compare English speech read by native speakers and by L2 Chinese speakers from shanghai , 2015, INTERSPEECH.

[2]  Ulrike Gut,et al.  Bridging research on phonetic descriptions with knowledge from teaching practice The case of prosody in non-native speech , 2008 .

[3]  Daniel Hirst,et al.  Building OMProDat: an open multilingual prosodic database , 2013 .

[4]  C. Looze,et al.  The OMe (Octave-Median) scale: a natural scale for speech melody. , 2014 .

[5]  Daniel Hirst,et al.  SPeech Phonetization Alignment and Syllabification (SPPAS): a tool for the automatic analysis of speech prosody , 2012 .

[6]  Yi Xu,et al.  ProsodyPro — A Tool for Large-scale Systematic Prosody Analysis , 2013 .

[7]  S. Eady,et al.  Differences in the F0 Patterns of Speech: Tone Language Versus Stress Language , 1981 .

[8]  Yi Xu,et al.  Maximum speed of pitch change and how it may relate to speech. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  Julio González,et al.  Formant frequencies and body size of speaker: a weak relationship in adult humans , 2004, J. Phonetics.

[10]  Paul Boersma,et al.  Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer , 2002 .

[11]  Hongwei Ding,et al.  Glottalization in inventory construction: a cross-language study , 2004, 2004 International Symposium on Chinese Spoken Language Processing.

[12]  J. Trouvain,et al.  TEMPO VARIATION IN SPEECH PRODUCTION , 2003 .

[13]  Caroline G. Henton,et al.  Fact and fiction in the description of female and male pitch , 1987 .

[14]  Johan Liljencrants,et al.  A New Approach to Intonation Analysis and Synthesis of Swedish , 2002 .

[15]  D. Hirst ProZed : A speech prosody analysis-by-synthesis tool for linguists , 2012 .

[16]  P. Keating,et al.  Comparison of speaking fundamental frequency in English and Mandarin. , 2010, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  A Phonetic Investigation of Intonational Foreign Accent in Mandarin Chinese Learners of German , 2012 .

[18]  Hongwei Ding,et al.  A preliminary investigation of the third tone sandhi in standard Chinese with a prosodic corpus , 2012, 2012 8th International Symposium on Chinese Spoken Language Processing.

[19]  James Emil Flege,et al.  Transfer and developmental processes in adult foreign language speech production , 1984, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[20]  Chiu-yu Tseng,et al.  Interaction of Lexical and Sentence Prosody in Taiwan L2 English , 2010 .

[21]  趙 元任,et al.  A grammar of spoken Chinese = 中國話的文法 , 1968 .

[22]  Julia Hirschberg,et al.  Perception of English Prominence by Native Mandarin Chinese Speakers , 2010 .