Efficient, Convergent SENSE MRI Reconstruction for Nonperiodic Boundary Conditions via Tridiagonal Solvers

Undersampling is an effective method for reducing scan acquisition time for MRI. Strategies for accelerated MRI, such as parallel MRI and compressed sensing MRI present challenging image reconstruction problems with nondifferentiable cost functions and computationally demanding operations. Variable splitting (VS) can simplify implementation of difficult image reconstruction problems, such as the combination of parallel MRI and compressed sensing, CS-SENSE-MRI. Combined with augmented Lagrangian (AL) and alternating minimization strategies, variable splitting can yield iterative minimization algorithms with simpler auxiliary variable updates. However, arbitrary variable splitting schemes are not guaranteed to converge. Many variable splitting strategies are combined with periodic boundary conditions. The resultant circulant Hessians enable $\mathcal {O} (n \log {} n)$ computation but may compromise image accuracy at the spatial boundaries. We propose two methods for CS-SENSE-MRI that use regularization with nonperiodic boundary conditions to prevent wrap-around artifacts. Each algorithm computes one of the resulting variable updates efficiently in $\mathcal {O}\left(n\right)$ time using a parallelizable tridiagonal solver. AL-tridiag is a VS method designed to enable efficient computation for nonperiodic boundary conditions. Another proposed algorithm, ADMM-tridiag, uses a similar VS scheme but also ensures convergence to a minimizer of the proposed cost function using the alternating direction method of multipliers (ADMM). AL-tridiag and ADMM-tridiag show speeds competitive with previous VS CS-SENSE-MRI reconstruction algorithm AL-P2. We also apply the tridiagonal VS approach to a simple image inpainting problem.

[1]  Jianqin Zhou,et al.  On discrete cosine transform , 2011, ArXiv.

[2]  Mário A. T. Figueiredo,et al.  Deconvolving Images With Unknown Boundaries Using the Alternating Direction Method of Multipliers , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[3]  Jan Modersitzki,et al.  Fast inversion of matrices arising in image processing , 1999, Numerical Algorithms.

[4]  Yunmei Chen,et al.  A novel method and fast algorithm for MR image reconstruction with significantly under-sampled data , 2010 .

[5]  Jeffrey A. Fessler,et al.  Accelerated Edge-Preserving Image Restoration Without Boundary Artifacts , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[6]  D. Donoho,et al.  Sparse MRI: The application of compressed sensing for rapid MR imaging , 2007, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[7]  Junfeng Yang,et al.  A Fast Alternating Direction Method for TVL1-L2 Signal Reconstruction From Partial Fourier Data , 2010, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing.

[8]  Raymond H. Chan,et al.  Alternating Direction Method for Image Inpainting in Wavelet Domains , 2011, SIAM J. Imaging Sci..

[9]  Jeffrey A. Fessler,et al.  Accelerated Regularized Estimation of MR Coil Sensitivities Using Augmented Lagrangian Methods , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[10]  Dimitri P. Bertsekas,et al.  Multiplier methods: A survey , 1975, at - Automatisierungstechnik.

[11]  Jeffrey A. Fessler,et al.  Parallel MR Image Reconstruction Using Augmented Lagrangian Methods , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[12]  Yunmei Chen,et al.  Computational Acceleration for MR Image Reconstruction in Partially Parallel Imaging , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[13]  Dimitri P. Bertsekas,et al.  On the Douglas—Rachford splitting method and the proximal point algorithm for maximal monotone operators , 1992, Math. Program..

[14]  Euhanna Ghadimi,et al.  Optimal Parameter Selection for the Alternating Direction Method of Multipliers (ADMM): Quadratic Problems , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[15]  Jeffrey A. Fessler,et al.  Regularized parallel mri reconstruction using an alternating direction method of multipliers , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro.

[16]  Marc Teboulle,et al.  Fast Gradient-Based Algorithms for Constrained Total Variation Image Denoising and Deblurring Problems , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[17]  Andreas Weinmann,et al.  Fast Partitioning of Vector-Valued Images , 2014, SIAM J. Imaging Sci..

[18]  Søren Holdt Jensen,et al.  Algorithms and software for total variation image reconstruction via first-order methods , 2009, Numerical Algorithms.

[19]  William W. Hager,et al.  Fast Algorithms for Image Reconstruction with Application to Partially Parallel MR Imaging , 2012, SIAM J. Imaging Sci..

[20]  José M. Bioucas-Dias,et al.  Fast Image Recovery Using Variable Splitting and Constrained Optimization , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[21]  Stephen P. Boyd,et al.  Distributed Optimization and Statistical Learning via the Alternating Direction Method of Multipliers , 2011, Found. Trends Mach. Learn..

[22]  Jonathan Eckstein Parallel alternating direction multiplier decomposition of convex programs , 1994 .

[23]  P. Boesiger,et al.  SENSE: Sensitivity encoding for fast MRI , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.