Real-Life Challenges in Using Augmentative and Alternative Communication by Persons With Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis

Given the linguistic and cognitive demands of communication, adult Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC) users with acquired communication disorders may have difficulty using AAC systems consistently and effectively in “real-life” situations. The process of recommending AAC systems and strategies is an area of exploration, where clinicians need to treat each client as a unique individual. Speech-language pathologists are required to analyze speech, language, cognition, sensory, and motor skills of the client when attempting to choose appropriate AAC systems. Various challenges during the AAC implementation process may range from funding sources, time commitment, training, and device acquisition to effective use of the device in day-to-day situations. The AAC management strategies are discussed in light of functional and multimodal communications. Also, the perspectives of AAC user regarding environment, communication partners, social communication status, and quality of life are addressed, along with a brief case report highlighting challenges and successes with AAC systems.

[1]  Janice Light,et al.  The iPad and Mobile Technology Revolution: Benefits and Challenges for Individuals who require Augmentative and Alternative Communication , 2013, Augmentative and alternative communication.

[2]  C. Binger,et al.  Partner Instruction in AAC: Strategies for Building Circles of Support , 2012 .

[3]  D. Beukelman,et al.  Communication Styles of Persons with ALS as Recounted by Surviving Partners , 2012, Augmentative and alternative communication.

[4]  S. Blackstone,et al.  Communication Access to Businesses and Organizations for People with Complex Communication Needs , 2012, Augmentative and alternative communication.

[5]  A. Brownlee,et al.  Methods of Communication at End of Life for the Person With Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis , 2012 .

[6]  J. Duffy Motor Speech Disorders and the Diagnosis of Neurologic Disease , 2008 .

[7]  Laura J. Ball,et al.  Duration of AAC Technology Use by Persons with ALS , 2007 .

[8]  Joanne P. Lasker,et al.  AAC and Severe Aphasia—Enhancing Communication Across the Continuum of Recovery , 2007 .

[9]  Susan Fager,et al.  AAC for adults with acquired neurological conditions: A review , 2007, Augmentative and alternative communication.

[10]  L. Lloyd,et al.  The Effect of Remnant and Pictographic Books on the Communicative Interaction of Individuals with Global Aphasia , 2005 .

[11]  Laura J. Ball,et al.  Acceptance of Augmentative and Alternative Communication Technology by Persons with Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis , 2004 .

[12]  M. Bourgeois,et al.  A comparison of training strategies to enhance use of external aids by persons with dementia. , 2003, Journal of communication disorders.

[13]  Laura J. Ball,et al.  Attitudes Toward Communication Modes and Message Formulation Techniques Used for Storytelling by People with Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis , 2003 .

[14]  A. Lustig,et al.  A written communication strategy for a speaker with aphasia and apraxia of speech: Treatment outcomes and social validity , 2002 .

[15]  Michelle S. Bourgeois,et al.  Memory aids as an augmentative and alternative communication strategy for nursing home residents with dementia , 2001 .

[16]  Joanne P. Lasker,et al.  Promoting acceptance of augmentative and alternative communication by adults with acquired communication disorders , 2001 .

[17]  M. Doyle,et al.  Trends in augmentative and alternative communication use by individuals with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis , 2001 .

[18]  A. Brownlee,et al.  The role of augmentative communication devices in the medical management of ALS. , 2007, NeuroRehabilitation.

[19]  Stephen N. Calculator,et al.  Roles and responsibilities of speech-language pathologists with respect to augmentative and alternative communication: Position Statement , 2005 .