Expanded analysis of secondary germline findings from matched tumor/normal sequencing identifies additional clinically significant mutations.

Background Next-generation sequencing (NGS) for tumor molecular profiling can reveal secondary germline pathogenic and likely pathogenic variants (LPV/PV). The American College of Medical Genetics (ACMG) recommends return of secondary results for a subset of 59 genes, but other genes with evidence of clinical utility are emerging. We previously reported that 4.3% of patients who underwent NGS of a targeted panel of 201 genes had LPV/PV based on the ACMG list. Here we report the frequency of additional germline cancer-related gene variants and discuss their clinical utility. Patients and Methods Matched tumor and germline DNA NGS of a targeted panel of 201 genes was performed in a research laboratory on samples from 1000 patients with advanced or metastatic solid tumors enrolled in a molecular testing protocol (NCT01772771). The frequency of germline LPV/PV in 54 cancer-related genes, beyond the genes in ACMG list, were analyzed. Results Among 1000 patients who underwent tumor/normal DNA sequencing, 46 (4.6%) were found to have a germline LPV/PV in the following genes: AR-(5), ATM-(4), BAP1-(1), CDH1-(1), CDKN2A-(1), CHEK1-(2), CHEK2-(10), EGFR-(1), ERCC3-(4), ERCC5-(1), HNF1B-(1), HRAS-(1), MITF-(4), MLL3-(1), NF1-(3), PKHD1-(4), PTCH1-(1), and SMARCA4-(1). Thus, a total 8.7% of patients had an LPV/PV with 2 patients having 2 concomitant germline LPV/PV. Five mutations in high-penetrance hereditary cancer predisposition genes were selected to be returned to patients or their representatives: BAP1, CDH1, CDKN2A, EGFR, and SMARCA4. Conclusions Broader genomic testing is likely to identify additional secondary pathogenic germline alterations, some with potential clinical utility for return to patients and their relatives. The recommended genes for which germline results should be returned are continually changing, warranting continued study.

[1]  T. Slavin,et al.  Clinical Application of Multigene Panels: Challenges of Next-Generation Counseling and Cancer Risk Management , 2015, Front. Oncol..

[2]  P. Kantoff,et al.  Mutation Detection in Patients With Advanced Cancer by Universal Sequencing of Cancer-Related Genes in Tumor and Normal DNA vs Guideline-Based Germline Testing , 2017, JAMA.

[3]  Nazneen Rahman,et al.  Realizing the promise of cancer predisposition genes , 2014, Nature.

[4]  Funda Meric-Bernstam,et al.  Feasibility of Large-Scale Genomic Testing to Facilitate Enrollment Onto Genomically Matched Clinical Trials. , 2015, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[5]  Theresa Zhang,et al.  Personalized genomic analyses for cancer mutation discovery and interpretation , 2015, Science Translational Medicine.

[6]  S. Gabriel,et al.  Advances in understanding cancer genomes through second-generation sequencing , 2010, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[7]  Ahmet Zehir,et al.  Inherited DNA-Repair Gene Mutations in Men with Metastatic Prostate Cancer. , 2016, The New England journal of medicine.

[8]  H. Hakonarson,et al.  ANNOVAR: functional annotation of genetic variants from high-throughput sequencing data , 2010, Nucleic acids research.

[9]  M. Robson,et al.  American Society of Clinical Oncology Policy Statement Update: Genetic and Genomic Testing for Cancer Susceptibility. , 2010, Journal of Clinical Oncology.

[10]  W. Chung,et al.  Recommendations for reporting of secondary findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing, 2016 update (ACMG SF v2.0): a policy statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics , 2016, Genetics in Medicine.

[11]  Amber M. Johnson,et al.  A feasibility study of returning clinically actionable somatic genomic alterations identified in a research laboratory , 2017, Oncotarget.

[12]  Ken Chen,et al.  Implementation of biomarker-driven cancer therapy: existing tools and remaining gaps. , 2014, Discovery medicine.

[13]  Tao Wang,et al.  Diagnostic Yield of Clinical Tumor and Germline Whole-Exome Sequencing for Children With Solid Tumors. , 2016, JAMA oncology.

[14]  Avni Santani,et al.  Development and Validation of Clinical Whole-Exome and Whole-Genome Sequencing for Detection of Germline Variants in Inherited Disease. , 2017, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[15]  Marc S. Williams,et al.  ACMG recommendations for reporting of incidental findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing , 2013, Genetics in Medicine.

[16]  Marilyn M. Li,et al.  Standards and Guidelines for the Interpretation and Reporting of Sequence Variants in Cancer: A Joint Consensus Recommendation of the Association for Molecular Pathology, American Society of Clinical Oncology, and College of American Pathologists. , 2017, The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD.

[17]  Donavan T. Cheng,et al.  Germline Variants in Targeted Tumor Sequencing Using Matched Normal DNA. , 2016, JAMA oncology.

[18]  L. Pusztai,et al.  Tumor profiling and the incidentalome: patient decisions and risks. , 2015, Future oncology.

[19]  J. Carpten,et al.  Identification of somatic mutations in cancer through Bayesian-based analysis of sequenced genome pairs , 2013 .

[20]  Stephanie A Cohen,et al.  Cancer Genetic Counselors’ Current Practices and Attitudes Related to the Use of Tumor Profiling , 2017, Journal of Genetic Counseling.

[21]  N. Pattabiraman,et al.  Impact of germline and somatic missense variations on drug binding sites , 2016, The Pharmacogenomics Journal.

[22]  Nazneen Rahman,et al.  Breast-cancer risk in families with mutations in PALB2. , 2014, The New England journal of medicine.

[23]  Bale,et al.  Standards and Guidelines for the Interpretation of Sequence Variants: A Joint Consensus Recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology , 2015, Genetics in Medicine.

[24]  John Kidd,et al.  Frequency of Germline Mutations in 25 Cancer Susceptibility Genes in a Sequential Series of Patients With Breast Cancer. , 2016, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[25]  Amber M. Johnson,et al.  Clinical next generation sequencing to identify actionable aberrations in a phase I program , 2014, Oncotarget.

[26]  Yuan Qi,et al.  Clinical actionability enhanced through deep targeted sequencing of solid tumors. , 2015, Clinical chemistry.

[27]  Lackner,et al.  The Role of Next‐Generation Sequencing in Enabling Personalized Oncology Therapy , 2016, Clinical and translational science.

[28]  Quan Li,et al.  InterVar: Clinical Interpretation of Genetic Variants by the 2015 ACMG-AMP Guidelines. , 2017, American journal of human genetics.

[29]  Lisle E. Mose,et al.  Germline Analysis from Tumor–Germline Sequencing Dyads to Identify Clinically Actionable Secondary Findings , 2016, Clinical Cancer Research.

[30]  Christopher A. Miller,et al.  VarScan 2: somatic mutation and copy number alteration discovery in cancer by exome sequencing. , 2012, Genome research.

[31]  J. Amberger,et al.  Searching Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (OMIM): A Knowledgebase of Human Genes and Genetic Phenotypes , 2017, Current protocols in bioinformatics.

[32]  Arie Perry,et al.  Targeted next-generation sequencing of pediatric neuro-oncology patients improves diagnosis, identifies pathogenic germline mutations, and directs targeted therapy , 2016, Neuro-oncology.

[33]  Y. Bombard,et al.  Revealing the incidentalome when targeting the tumor genome. , 2013, JAMA.

[34]  Li Ding,et al.  Germline Mutations in Predisposition Genes in Pediatric Cancer. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.

[35]  Ann M. Bailey,et al.  Incidental germline variants in 1000 advanced cancers on a prospective somatic genomic profiling protocol. , 2016, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[36]  Deanna M. Church,et al.  ClinVar: public archive of relationships among sequence variation and human phenotype , 2013, Nucleic Acids Res..

[37]  E. Plimack,et al.  TumorNext: A comprehensive tumor profiling assay that incorporates high resolution copy number analysis and germline status to improve testing accuracy , 2016, Oncotarget.