Application of direct displacement based design to long span bridges

The paper investigates the applicability of current direct displacement based seismic design (DDBD) procedure, developed by Priestley and his coworkers, for straight long span bridges under transverse seismic excitation synchronous to all supports. This category of bridges often possess some additional features such as massive tall piers, highly irregular distribution of mass and stiffness due to unequal superstructure spans and pier heights, large deformation capacity etc. that are absent in short-to-moderate span bridges for which DDBD has extensively been verified. It is shown that DDBD in its current form is unable to capture both displacement and base shear demand when compared with nonlinear dynamic analysis results. Accordingly, a simple mechanics based extension of the current procedure that takes into account the effect of pier mass while computing base shear demand as well as a modal combination rule for estimating displacement demand is proposed and validated using a series of parametric studies. The new procedure also allows engineer to allocate strength at the potential plastic hinge location in more general terms.

[1]  JoAnn Browning,et al.  Proportioning of Earthquake-Resistant RC Building Structures , 2001 .

[2]  Mark Aschheim,et al.  Yield Point Spectra for Seismic Design and Rehabilitation , 2000 .

[3]  J. P. Moehle,et al.  Displacement-Based Design of RC Structures Subjected to Earthquakes , 1992 .

[4]  Michael N. Fardis,et al.  DEFORMATION-CONTROLLED EARTHQUAKE-RESISTANT DESIGN OF RC BUILDINGS , 1999 .

[5]  Gian Michele Calvi,et al.  Displacement-based seismic design of multi-degree-of-freedom bridge structures , 1995 .

[6]  Joseph P. Nicoletti,et al.  Seismic Design and Retrofit of Bridges , 1996 .

[7]  Mervyn J. Kowalsky,et al.  Implementation of Inelastic Displacement Patterns in Direct Displacement-Based Design of Continuous Bridge Structures , 2006 .

[8]  Chia-Ming Uang,et al.  Establishing R (or Rw) and Cd Factors for Building Seismic Provisions , 1991 .

[9]  Mervyn J. Kowalsky,et al.  A displacement‐based approach for the seismic design of continuous concrete bridges , 2002 .

[10]  Mjn Priestley,et al.  Seismic Design and Retrofit of Bridges , 1996 .

[11]  Cyclic Soil Plasticity.  EUROPEAN SCHOOL FOR ADVANCED STUDIES IN REDUCTION OF SEISMIC RISK ROSE SCHOOL , 2002 .

[12]  Gian Michele Calvi,et al.  DIRECT DISPLACEMENT BASED SEISMIC DESIGN , 2009 .

[13]  Mervyn J. Kowalsky,et al.  THE LIMITATIONS AND PERFORMANCES OF DIFFERENT DISPLACEMENT BASED DESIGN METHODS , 2003 .

[14]  M. J. Nigel Priestley,et al.  Myths and fallacies in earthquake engineering , 1993 .